Laser Versus Physiotherapy in Management of Bruxism in Children: RCS (RCS)

November 12, 2023 updated by: Mohamed Farouk Rashed, National Research Centre, Egypt

Evaluation of Laser Acupuncture Versus Modified Physical Therapy Intervention in Management of Bruxism in Children, Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Study

The goal of this randomized controlled study is to compare laser acupuncture versus modified physical therapy in controlling bruxism in children. The main questions aim to answer are:

  • Laser will decrease tempro-mandibular joint pain from bruxism more than modified physical therapy?
  • Laser will decrease muscles activity from bruxism more than modified physical therapy? Children took 6 sessions of either laser acupuncture or modified physical therapy Researchers compared laser acupuncture versus modified physical therapy to see if any decrease in tempro-mandibular joint pain and muscles activity from bruxism

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The children participated in the study as bruxers according to the American Association of Sleep Medicine (AASM) diagnostic criteria [ Sixteen children will be randomly allocated to two groups of 8 individuals each: Group one: laser acupuncture, Group two: electromyography biofeedback training.

Pain will be measured by Visual Analogue scale; VAS (primary outcome)and muscle activity will be measured by Electromyography (Secondary outcome) of temporalis and masseter muscles. Measurements will be taken preoperatively and after 8 weeks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Giza
      • Dokki, Giza, Egypt, 12622
        • National Research Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Six to twelve years children
  2. Medically free
  3. Normal occlusion
  4. No or low caries experience
  5. Clinical dental wear
  6. Clenching or grinding reported by the parents

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Children with any physical or psychological disease.
  2. Children received any previous treatment for bruxism.
  3. Children with tempro-mandibular joint disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Laser acupuncture
Laser acupuncture biostimulation for temporalis and masseter muscles
Biostimulation of temporalis and masseter muscles
Other Names:
  • Doctor smile low level laser device
Experimental: Modified physical therapy
Muscle relaxation and biofeedback for temporalis and masseter muscles
Progressive muscle relaxation of temporalis and masseter muscles
Other Names:
  • Relaxation and biofeedback of muscles

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tempro-mandibular joint pain
Time Frame: 2 months
Tenderness and pain of temporalis and masseter muscles by visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain before and after intervention either no pain, mild pain, moderate or severe pain. Better outcome means no or mild pain
2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Activity of temporalis and masseter muscles
Time Frame: 2 months
Activity of temporalis and masseter muscles by surface electromyography (EMG) at rest and during function (Decrease in activity by small values bymicrons means better outcome and vice versa)
2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mohamed F Rashed, Researcher, National Research Centre, Egypt

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 22, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

October 19, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 20, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2023

First Posted (Estimated)

November 14, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 14, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 4-4-3

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No plan to share results

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bruxism

Clinical Trials on Laser acupuncture

Subscribe