Evaluation of Geriatric Assessment and Management for Older Adults With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy Radiation Therapy

July 2, 2025 updated by: City of Hope Medical Center

Geriatric Assessment and Management (GAM) for Older Adults With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy Radiation Therapy (GAM-CRT)

This clinical trial tests how well a geriatric assessment (GA) with GA-directed treatment recommendations, compared to GA with usual care, works in identifying risk factors, reducing chemotherapy radiation toxicity and functional decline, and improving the overall quality of life in older patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Older patients with lung cancer undergoing chemotherapy are at an increased risk of adverse outcomes including treatment toxicity and functional and physical consequences. This makes it very challenging for the physicians to balance the benefits against the risk of chemotherapy in older cancer patients. A geriatric assessment may be useful in identifying risk factors for chemotherapy radiation toxicity. Communicating these geriatric assessment findings and assessment-based recommendations to a patient's treating physicians may help them make more informed decisions about treatment options for patients. Making treatment decisions using GA-based recommendations may reduce adverse events and improve outcomes in patients receiving treatment for NSCLC.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To demonstrate if providing a GA summary and recommendations for GA-directed interventions to oncology care teams decreases the proportion of older adults with unresectable, stage III NSCLC who experience any grade 3-5 non-hematologic toxicity from chemotherapy and radiation.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To demonstrate the differences between the intervention versus usual care group among:

Ia. Overall grade 3-5 toxicities; Ib. Patient-reported symptomatic toxicities as measured by Patient Reported Outcomes - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PROCTCAE), Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - 10 (PROMIS-10); Ic. Implementation of GA recommendations; Id. GA outcomes including function (Activities of Daily Living/Instrumental Activities of Daily Living,), physical performance (Short Physical Performance Battery, 2 minute [min] walk, falls), polypharmacy (reduction in medication burden), mood (Geriatric Depression Scale 5/15 and PROMIS Anxiety short form 4a); Ie. Quality of life (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 [EORTC-QLQ-30]); If. Treatment sequencing (concurrent versus sequential) and completion, hospitalizations/emergency department (ED) rates.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE:

I. To explore microbial diversity and blood components at baseline, and at 6 months from treatment initiation as a potential biomarker of treatment-related toxicity and disease response.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Patients complete a geriatric assessment. Patients and physicians receive the geriatric assessment summary and assessment-based recommendations, which are provided prior to beginning chemotherapy and radiation, at the midpoint of chemotherapy and radiation treatment, and at the end of treatment. Patients also undergo blood and stool sample collection during screening and on study.

ARM II: Patients complete a geriatric assessment, but information other than clinically significant cognitive impairment and depression is not provided to the oncology teams, per usual care. Patients also undergo blood and stool sample collection during screening and on study.

After completion of study intervention, patients are followed up at 4-6 weeks, 10-14 weeks, and 20-26 weeks after baseline.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

180

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Duarte, California, United States, 91010
        • Recruiting
        • City of Hope Medical Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Arya Amini
        • Contact:
    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14642
        • Not yet recruiting
        • University of Rochester
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Supriya G. Mohile
        • Contact:
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Recruiting
        • Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Carolyn J. Presley
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ONCOLOGY PHYSICIANS INCLUSION:
  • Oncology physicians must work at the participating site with no plans to leave that site or retire at the time of enrollment into the study
  • PATIENTS INCLUSION:
  • Any patient with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer diagnosis who is 60 years of age or older and must be treated at the participating site
  • Clinical staging without pathological confirmation of nodal disease is allowed
  • Plan to start a new cancer treatment regimen within 4-6 weeks from time of baseline study visit. The treatment regimen is up to the discretion of the treating oncology physician. The regimen must include a chemotherapy drug or other agents that have similar prevalence of toxicity. This can be either concurrent or sequential with radiation therapy
  • Chemotherapy will be defined as cytotoxic drugs; in addition, agents (e.g., monoclonal antibodies and targeted agents) will be allowed. Given the rapidly changing landscape of new drugs for cancer, the study team led by the principal investigator (PI) will update the list accordingly after reviewing the toxicity profile of new therapies
  • Patients who are receiving approved cancer treatment in combination or sequentially with radiation including hypo fractionated radiation (45-60Gy in 15-20 fractions) are eligible
  • Those patients with oligometastatic disease having only one site and one lesion outside of the radiation field will be eligible. Examples include a solitary brain metastasis (met), contralateral lung nodule or an adrenal metastatic site
  • A patient may also be enrolled on a treatment trial and participate in this study, if all other inclusion and exclusion criteria are met
  • Able to provide informed consent, or if the oncology physician determines the patient to not have decision-making capacity, a patient-designated health care proxy (or authorized representative per institutional policies) must sign consent by the baseline visit
  • Participant or healthcare proxy has adequate understanding of the English language (preferred) because not all GA measures have been validated in other languages. Study team should be contacted for any participants with other preferred languages including Spanish and Mandarin. Inclusion of these participants will depend upon the availability of the translators and their ability to accurately translate the measures as approved by the local Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • PATIENTS EXCLUSION:
  • Have surgery planned within 3 months of approach date. Patients who have previously received surgery are eligible
  • Presence of symptomatic brain metastases (if more than one) at time of study consent process. Patients with history of treated brain metastases or small indeterminate lesions (< 1cm) are eligible if they are not symptomatic at the time of study enrollment
  • More than one metastatic site: Examples: brain and adrenal, adrenal and liver

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm I (GA intervention)
Patients complete a geriatric assessment. Patients and physicians receive the geriatric assessment summary and assessment-based recommendations, which are provided prior to beginning chemotherapy and radiation, at the midpoint of chemotherapy and radiation treatment, and at the end of treatment. Patients also undergo blood and stool sample collection during screening and on study.
Ancillary studies
Ancillary studies
Undergo blood and stool sample collection
Other Names:
  • Biological Sample Collection
  • Biospecimen Collected
  • Specimen Collection
Receive GA assessment summary and assessment-based recommendations
Complete GA
Active Comparator: Arm II (usual care)
Patients complete a geriatric assessment, but information other than clinically significant cognitive impairment and depression is not provided to the oncology teams, per usual care. Patients also undergo blood and stool sample collection during screening and on study.
Receive usual care
Other Names:
  • standard of care
  • standard therapy
Ancillary studies
Ancillary studies
Undergo blood and stool sample collection
Other Names:
  • Biological Sample Collection
  • Biospecimen Collected
  • Specimen Collection
Complete GA

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of grade 3-5 non-hematologic toxicities
Time Frame: At 6 months from treatment initiation
Will be assessed by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 (NCI CTCAE v 5.0) for grade 3-5 non-hematologic toxicities. Chi-square test will be used to compare proportion of patients with grade 3-5 non-hematologic toxicity between two arms at 6 months after treatment initiation.
At 6 months from treatment initiation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall grade 3 to 5 toxicities
Time Frame: At 6 months from treatment initiation
Will be assessed by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 (NCI CTCAE v 5.0) for grade 3-5 toxicities. Chi-square test will be used to compare proportion of patients with grade 3-5 toxicities between two arms at 6 months after treatment initiation.
At 6 months from treatment initiation
Patient-reported symptomatic toxicities
Time Frame: At 6 months from treatment initiation
Will be assessed by the Patient Reported Outcome version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-10. Chi-square test or fisher's exact test will be used to examine the difference between the two arms.
At 6 months from treatment initiation
Function
Time Frame: At 6 months from treatment initiation
Will be assessed by activities of daily living/instrumental activities of daily living. T test Chi-square test or fisher's exact test will be used to examine the difference between the two arms.
At 6 months from treatment initiation
Physical performance -SPPB
Time Frame: At 6 months from treatment initiation
Will be assessed by the short physical performance battery (SPPB) which is scored according to instruction, range from 0 to 12), T test, Chi-square test or fisher's exact test will be used to examine the difference between the two arms.
At 6 months from treatment initiation
Physical performance - 2 minute walking
Time Frame: At 6 months from treatment initiation
Will be assessed by 2 minute walking test (meters). T test, Chi-square test or fisher's exact test will be used to examine the difference between the two arms.
At 6 months from treatment initiation
Physical performance - number of falls
Time Frame: At 6 months from treatment initiation
Will be assessed by number of falls (count number). T test, Chi-square test or fisher's exact test will be used to examine the difference between the two arms.
At 6 months from treatment initiation
Polypharmacy
Time Frame: At 3 months from treatment initiation
Will be assessed by the reduction in medication burden. Chi-square test or fisher's exact test will be used to examine the difference between the two arms.
At 3 months from treatment initiation
Mood - GDS
Time Frame: At 6 months from treatment initiation

Will be assessed by the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) 5/15 (scored according to guideline).

T test, Chi-square test or fisher's exact test will be used to examine the difference between the two arms.

At 6 months from treatment initiation
Mood - Anxiety
Time Frame: At 6 months from treatment initiation
Will be assessed by PROMIS anxiety (scored according to guideline). T test, Chi-square test or fisher's exact test will be used to examine the difference between the two arms.
At 6 months from treatment initiation
Quality of life
Time Frame: At 6 months from treatment initiation

Will be assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 scored according to guideline.

T test, Chi-square test or fisher's exact test will be used to examine the difference between the two arms.

At 6 months from treatment initiation
Treatment completion rates
Time Frame: At 6 months from treatment initiation
Chi-square test or fisher's exact test will be used to examine the difference between the two arms.
At 6 months from treatment initiation
Hospitalizations/emergency department visit rates
Time Frame: At 6 months from treatment initiation
Chi-square test or fisher's exact test will be used to examine the difference between the two arms.
At 6 months from treatment initiation
Incidence of adverse events from durvalumab
Time Frame: After completion of adjuvant treatment (12 months)
Chi-square test or fisher's exact test will be used to examine the difference between the two arms.
After completion of adjuvant treatment (12 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Arya Amini, City of Hope Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 21, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 19, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 19, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 4, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 23398 (Other Identifier: City of Hope Medical Center)
  • P30CA033572 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • NCI-2023-07140 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Non-Small Cell Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Best Practice

Subscribe