Achieving Sustained Early Child Development Impacts at Scale: A Test in Kenya

May 30, 2025 updated by: Italo Lopez Garcia, University of Southern California

An estimated 43% of children under age 5 in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) experience compromised development due to poverty, poor nutrition, and inadequate psychosocial stimulation. Numerous early childhood development (ECD) parenting interventions have been shown to be effective at improving ECD outcomes, at least in the short-term, but they are a) still too expensive to implement at scale in low-resource and rural settings, and b) their early impacts tend to fade over time in the absence of continued support. New ways to deliver effective ECD parenting interventions are sorely needed that are both low-cost to be potentially scalable, while also able to sustain impacts long-term.

The rapid growth and low cost of mobile communications in LMIC settings presents a potentially promising solution to the competing problems of scalability and sustainability. Yet there is no rigorous research on mobile-health (mHealth) interventions for ECD outcomes in LMIC settings. Study investigators recently showed that an 8-month ECD parenting intervention featuring fortnightly group meetings delivered by Community Health Workers (CHWs) from Kenya's rural health care system significantly improved child cognitive, language, and socioemotional development as well as parenting practices, and a group-based delivery model was more cost-effective than previous ECD interventions. Yet it is still too expensive for scaling in a rural LMIC setting such as rural Kenya, particularly if interventions are needed that can be extended for longer periods of time to increase their ability to sustain impacts. This study will experimentally test a traditional in-person group-based delivery model for an ECD parenting intervention against an mHealth-based delivery model that partially substitutes remote delivery for in-person group meetings. The relative effectiveness and costs of this hybrid-delivery model will be assessed against a purely in-person group model, and the interventions will extend over two years to increase their ability to sustain changes in child outcomes longer-term. The evaluation design is a clustered Randomized Control Trial across 90 CHWs and their associated villages and 1200 households. The central hypothesis is that a hybrid ECD intervention will be lower cost, but remote delivery may be an inferior substitute for in-person visits, leaving open the question of the most cost-effective program.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kisumu, Kenya, 40100
        • Safe Water and AIDS Project

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • mothers or other primary caretakers aged 18 years or older
  • able to read English or Swahili at a level sufficient to understand the SMS messages
  • with a child aged 6-18 months at recruitment without signs of severe mental or physical impairments (youngest child if more than one eligible for a given mother)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • mothers/households without children
  • households with children that are outside the age range of 6-18 months at baseline
  • mothers who lack basic literacy so as not to understand SMS messages

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control Group
Mothers and children in 30 villages will not receive any intervention beyond information about child feeding during a baseline survey.
Active Comparator: In-Person Group Delivery
A total of 30 villages will receive a traditional in-person group-based delivery for Msingi Bora, an ECD parenting intervention featuring 16 biweekly village sessions over 8 months, followed by monthly "booster" meetings for 16 additional months. Sessions will be delivered within by existing village Community Health Volunteers (CHVs). Mothers and children will be invited to attend a total of 32 in-person sessions of roughly 1.5-2 hours apiece over 24 months.
Msingi Bora's structured curriculum of 16 biweekly sessions and monthly boosters thereafter are organized around five key messages: love and respect within the family, responsive talk, responsive play, hygiene, and nutrition.
Experimental: Hybrid mHealth/In-Person Group Delivery
30 CHVs will deliver a hybrid intervention that combines in-person meetings with remote delivery for Msingi Bora, an ECD parenting intervention. Mother-child dyads will be invited to participate in roughly 10 in-person group sessions in the first 8 months, followed by 5 in-person group sessions over the next 16 months. For those sessions delivered remotely, mothers will receive videos demonstrating the practices, SMS messages, be invited to participate in group SMS/WhatsApp chats with the CHV and other village mothers, and periodic phone calls. The project will provide smartphones to all mothers assigned to this arm for facilitation.
Msingi Bora's structured curriculum of 16 biweekly sessions and monthly boosters thereafter are organized around five key messages: love and respect within the family, responsive talk, responsive play, hygiene, and nutrition.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Child Cognitive Development - Bayley
Time Frame: Midline/8-month survey, Endline/24-month survey
The Bayley Scales of Infant Development 3rd edition (Bayley's III) is validated in African settings and provides measures for all dimensions of child development up to 42 months of age. The official age-standardized cognitive scale has a 0-19 range with higher values denoting better scores.
Midline/8-month survey, Endline/24-month survey

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Parenting Behaviors
Time Frame: Midline/8-month survey, Endline/24-month survey
The Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME)- Short Form (SF) inventory has four versions: one for children under age three; a second for children between the ages of three and five; a third for children ages six through nine; and a fourth version for children ten and over. The total raw score for the HOME-SF is a simple summation of the recorded individual item scores and it varies by age group, as the number of individual items varies according to the age of the child. At the endline/month 8 survey the HOME scale scores will range from 0-45, with higher scores denoting better outcomes.
Midline/8-month survey, Endline/24-month survey

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maternal Depression
Time Frame: Midline/8-month survey, Endline/24-month survey
The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) is a self-reported measure of depressive symptoms during the previous two weeks. It is composed of 8 Likert-style items with a response scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 3 (Nearly every day). The PHQ-8 final score ranges from 0 to 24, with higher scores corresponding to higher levels of depression.
Midline/8-month survey, Endline/24-month survey

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Italo Lopez Garcia, PhD, University of Southern California
  • Principal Investigator: Jill E Luoto, PhD, University of Southern California

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 24, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R01HD107116 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The final dataset will be stripped of identifiers prior to release for sharing. In no way will there be the possibility of deductive disclosure of subjects. We will make the data without identifiers publicly available in accordance with NIH policy by posting it in de-identified form to the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) data bank. More information on their data confidentiality practices can be found at: https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/pages/datamanagement/confidentiality/index.html.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Child Behavior

Clinical Trials on Msingi Bora responsive parenting and family wellbeing program

Subscribe