A New Neuroregulatory Technology for the Therapy of AN Based on the Pathological Neural Network of ACC

April 25, 2024 updated by: Jue CHEN, Shanghai Mental Health Center

A New Neuroregulatory Technology for the Therapy of AN Based on the Pathological Neural Network of ACC: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study

Hypothesis of "AN-ACC pathological network" suggests that ACC overactivation and abnormal functional connectivity with other brain regions is the neuropathological mechanism for the onset of AN. Currently, rare studies have been conducted on dTMS targeting ACC as an intervention in patients with AN. In this research, dTMS, a neuroregulatory technology, is used for the first time to intervene with ACC in the treatment of adult AN. A randomized controlled study design is adopted, in which patients with AN are divided into the dTMS treatment group and the pseudo-stimulation group by 1:1 randomization, followed by 6-week intervention and half-year follow up, to clarify the near-term and long-term efficacy and safety of the dTMS treatment. Meanwhile, baseline fMRI data will be extracted and combined with clinical features to establish an efficacy prediction model, which will provide theoretical and practical basis for the pioneering ACC-targeted dTMS treatment in China, helping to establish a new type of intervention program for AN, with expected results of innovation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Building on the previous foundation and literature review, we found that ACC is closely related to the core symptoms of AN, and proposed the hypothesis of "AN-ACC pathological network", suggesting that ACC overactivation and abnormal functional connectivity with other brain regions (anterior frontal lobe, parietal lobe, precuneus, and striatum) is the neuropathological mechanism for the onset of AN.

Currently, rare studies have been conducted on dTMS targeting ACC as an intervention in patients with AN. In this research, dTMS, a neuroregulatory technology, is used for the first time to intervene with ACC in the treatment of adult AN. A randomized controlled study design is adopted, in which patients with AN are divided into the dTMS treatment group and the pseudo-stimulation group by 1:1 randomization, followed by a 28-day intervention (once a day) and half-year follow up, to clarify the near-term and long-term efficacy and safety of the dTMS treatment. Patients in both groups undergo fMRI examinations, complete delay discounting task (DDT) and body image task before and after each treatment session. Efficacy is judged by a weight gain of 4 kg in the four weeks following the intervention. Symptoms, psychometrics and side effect questionnaires are followed up at baseline, day 28 (at the end of treatment), and weeks 4, 8, 12 and 24 ( after completion of treatment).

Meanwhile, baseline fMRI data will be extracted and combined with clinical features to establish an efficacy prediction model. We will explore factors predictive of dTMS efficacy in AN patients of dTMS treatment group, divided into two groups according to whether dTMS is effective or not after treatment (defined as a weight gain of 4 kg in the four weeks following the intervention), using pre-treatment (baseline) demographic information, psychological assessment questionnaires, and neuroimaging data in the two groups. This will provide theoretical and practical basis for the pioneering ACC-targeted dTMS treatment in China, helping to establish a new type of intervention program for AN, with expected results of innovation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200030

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female, aged 18-35 years, right handedness.
  • Above primary education.
  • Meet the diagnostic criteria of AN in DSM-V, and13.0 kg/m2 ≤ body mass index (BMI)<18.5 kg/m2.
  • No systemic nutritional therapy, psychiatric medication or any form of psychotherapy have been received within 1 month before enrollment.
  • Able to understand the nature of this study and sign an informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with a DSM-5 disease other than anorexia nervosa, or at high risk of suicide, strong impulsive behavior as well as anti-social behavior.
  • With severe physical or cognitive impairment.
  • Not able to undergo MRI.
  • Considered unsuitable for enrollment in this clinical trial for other reasons.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: dTMS treatment group
dTMS treatment group has 40 patients with dTMS intervention using real coils, targeting ACC, given once per day, for 28 days, with a total of 28 treatments.
According to national and international guidelines for the treatment of eating disorders, the basic treatment for patients is nutritional therapy, that is, regular and quantitative dietary treatment, with three regular meals followed by a snack meal 2 hours after the regular meal. Both groups received the same nutritional treatment.

Neuronavigation: The coil is positioned 4cm in front of the scalp point and foot motor cortex, corresponding to the ACC. The Brainways H7 coil with fluid cooling is used to obtain a greater depth of stimulation, up to about 6 cm below the cortex.

dTMS intervention: The intervention targets are at the left and right ACC, once per day, for 28 days. A total of 28 treatments are given. Stimulation mode: stimulation frequency 1Hz, stimulation intensity 100% RMT, number of pulses 150, sequence interval 20s, total 6 trials, 900 pulses.

Sham Comparator: pseudo-stimulation group
Pseudo-stimulation group has 40 patients with dTMS intervention using sham coils (with the same parameters as real dTMS and generating the same noise as real coils, but without the magnetic field). It is given once per day, for 28 days, with a total of 28 treatments.
According to national and international guidelines for the treatment of eating disorders, the basic treatment for patients is nutritional therapy, that is, regular and quantitative dietary treatment, with three regular meals followed by a snack meal 2 hours after the regular meal. Both groups received the same nutritional treatment.

Neuronavigation: The sham coil is positioned 4 cm in front of the scalp point and foot motor cortex, corresponding to the ACC.

Sham dTMS intervention: The intervention targets are at the left and right ACC (The sham coil has the same parameters as real dTMS and generating the same noise as real coils, but without the magnetic field), once per day, for 28 days. A total of 28 treatments are given.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Body Mass Index (BMI).
Time Frame: whin 4 weeks after completion of treatment
Calculation: BMI = weight (kg) divided by the square of height (m)
whin 4 weeks after completion of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
1.Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q6.0)
Time Frame: baseline, day 28 (at the end of treatment), and weeks 4, 8, 12 and 24 ( after completion of treatment).
Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire can assess the core symptoms of eating disorders, including behavioral and psychological characteristics, and rate their frequency and intensity, which can assess the severity of the eating disorder. It consists of 4 subscales, including dietary restriction, eating concerns, body image concerns, and weight concerns.
baseline, day 28 (at the end of treatment), and weeks 4, 8, 12 and 24 ( after completion of treatment).
2.Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI-II)
Time Frame: baseline, day 28 (at the end of treatment), and weeks 4, 8, 12 and 24 ( after completion of treatment).
It is a commonly used scale for assessing cognitive-behavioral symptoms of eating disorders and is used to assess the severity of eating disorders. The scale contains 91 items divided into 8 subscales and 3 temporary subscales, including the pursuit of thinness, bulimia, body dissatisfaction, feelings of ineffectiveness, perfectionism, mistrust of others, introspection, maturity fears, abstinence, impulsive regulation and social insecurity.
baseline, day 28 (at the end of treatment), and weeks 4, 8, 12 and 24 ( after completion of treatment).
3.Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Time Frame: baseline, day 28 (at the end of treatment), and weeks 4, 8, 12 and 24 ( after completion of treatment).
The BDI consists of 21 items and assesses the patient's accompanying feelings of depression over the past 2 weeks.
baseline, day 28 (at the end of treatment), and weeks 4, 8, 12 and 24 ( after completion of treatment).
4.Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Time Frame: baseline, day 28 (at the end of treatment), and weeks 4, 8, 12 and 24 ( after completion of treatment).
The BAI consists of 21 items and assesses the patient's accompanying feelings of anxiety over the past 1 week.
baseline, day 28 (at the end of treatment), and weeks 4, 8, 12 and 24 ( after completion of treatment).
5. Self-assessed Compulsive Questionnaire for Eating Disorders (SR-YBC-EDS)
Time Frame: baseline, day 28 (at the end of treatment), and weeks 4, 8, 12 and 24 ( after completion of treatment).
The SR-YBC-EDS was developed based on the Yale-Brown Compulsive Questionnaire for Eating Disorders (YBC-EDS), consisting of two parts: the first part is a list of 65 symptomatic items, which is used to identify the subjects' obsessive-compulsive symptoms, and the second part is a list of 8 core items, which is used to assess the frequency and severity of obsessive-compulsive symptoms. All parts contain two dimensions: preoccupation and ritual behavior.
baseline, day 28 (at the end of treatment), and weeks 4, 8, 12 and 24 ( after completion of treatment).
6. Body Image Tasks
Time Frame: baseline, day 28 (at the end of treatment), and weeks 4, 8, 12 and 24 (after completion of treatment).

Tasks that address excessive concerns about body shape/weight include the following two parts:

Body size estimation: The screen will present the above 30 body size pictures sequentially, the subjects will view the body size pictures in 4000ms, and then evaluate the body size of the body pictures in 4000ms, with a score of 1 representing "very low body weight", 4 representing "very overweight", and 4 representing "very overweight". A score of 1 represents "very low weight" and a score of 4 represents "very overweight".

Body compare task: The screen will present the above 30 body images in turn, the subjects will have 4000ms to view their own images (with randomized distortions), and then they will have 4000ms to compare their actual body shape with the body shape in the images and assess their emotional level. 1 point represents "very calm" and 4 for "very anxious".

baseline, day 28 (at the end of treatment), and weeks 4, 8, 12 and 24 (after completion of treatment).
7. Delay Discounting Task (DDT task)
Time Frame: baseline, day 28 (at the end of treatment), and weeks 4, 8, 12 and 24 (after completion of treatment).
The study uses a DDT task in a food choice scenario to assess inhibitory impulses. The task requires subjects to make a decision between choosing a small reward in the present or a large reward in the future. Inhibition to choose a small reward in the present implies a strong intertemporal decision-making ability. The task begins with an assessment of their hunger, willingness to eat, and emotional feelings at the moment. Then they are asked to rate 40 pictures of food on a scale of 0 to 10 on five dimensions: familiarity, craving, positive and negative emotions, emotional intensity, and eating control. Pictures of foods with craving scores >7 and eating control <5, as well as matched in familiarity and emotion for use in the ensuing delay discounting task. The choice is made by pressing a button: Patients choosing to get less food immediately are given fewer coupons after the delay. But those waiting for a period of time to get more food are given more coupons after the delay.
baseline, day 28 (at the end of treatment), and weeks 4, 8, 12 and 24 (after completion of treatment).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jue Chen, PHD, Shanghai Mental Health Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 30, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SHDC12023122

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The study protocol and baseline characteristics of participants.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Researchers will share data when the study is completed in December 2026.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

dTMS; anorexia nervosa; anterior cingulate cortex

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Feeding and Eating Disorders

Clinical Trials on Basic treatment

Subscribe