Dural Puncture Epidural Technique During Cesarean Section

May 17, 2024 updated by: Reham Ali Abdelhaleem Abdelrahman

A Randomized Comparative Study Between 25-Gauge and 27-Gauage Pencil Point Spinal Needles During Dural Puncture Epidural Anaesthesia For Elective Caesarean Section

DPE technique was performed by creating a perforation in the dura mater using a pencil point spinal needle (25-27G) through the shaft of an epidural needle. After the dural perforation was created and the free flow of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was confirmed, which was considered a definitive end point for the likely positioning of the epidural needle tip within the epidural space, and by avoiding direct intrathecal administration of medication making DPE technique of fewer adverse effects in comparison to CSE technique, then spinal needle was withdrawn without local anesthetic injection into the subarachnoid space and the epidural catheter was normally placed in the epidural space followed by injecting local anesthetics into the epidural space via the epidural catheter, where the dural puncture created a conduit for translocation of local anesthetics from the epidural space to the subarachnoid space which was a unique feature of DPE technique.

Our study assessed the efficacy of DPE with pencil point spinal needle (25-27 G) during elective CS. Primary outcome was the onset time of surgical anesthesia which is defined as the time from the end of the initial dose injection to when the bilateral sensory block level reached the T6 dermatome. secondary outcomes were number of patients with cranial sensory block toT6 Level, number of patients with a modified bromage score reaching 3 at 15 min, intraoperative IV analgesia, local anesthetic volume, incidence of vasopressor administration and maternal &fetal complications.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 11562
        • Reham Ali Abdelhaleem Abdelrahman

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy pregnant women (ASAI&II) with singleton vertex presentation cephalic presentation foetus at 38 to 42 weeksꞌ gestation.
  • Age: 20-35 years old.
  • Weight: 57-85 Kg.
  • Height: 155-170cm.

Exclusion criteria

  • Non-elective CS.
  • Known foetal anomalies.
  • Patient refusal or uncooperative patients.
  • Patients with history of drug abuse and maternal diseases (i.e. diabetes mellitus, cardiac disease, heart block/dysrhythmia, hypertension, chronic obstructive respiratory disease, preeclampsia, eclampsia, placenta previa, placental abruption, coagulation abnormalities or hematological diseases).
  • Spinal deformities, previous spinal surgeries, allergy to amide type of local anesthetics, localized skin sepsis at spinal lumbar region, neurological diseases, peripheral neuropathy, neuromuscular diseases, psychiatric diseases, hepatic and renal diseases, metabolic and endocrinal diseases and Raynaud's disease.
  • Severe hypovolemia, severe hemodynamic instability and patients with anemia (Hb <10 gm %).
  • Morbidly obese (BMI > 35 kg/m2) patients.
  • Those who are very short (<150cm) or very tall (>170 cm).
  • Patients on therapy with adrenergic receptor antagonist, anticoagulants, calcium channel blocker, and/or ACE inhibitor.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Dural Puncture Epidural technique using pencil-point 25G Whitacre needle
- DPE technique was performed in the sitting position at the L3/4 or L4/5 interspace via the midline approach using a 17-gauge Touhy needle and a loss of resistance to saline technique, then the dura was punctured with a 27-gauage pencil point Whitacre spinal needles using a needle-through-needle technique, and spontaneous flow of cerebrospinal fluid was confirmed, then the spinal needle was removed and a flexible 19-gauge, spring closed-tip catheter was inserted 5 cm into the epidural space toward the cranial side.
Experimental: Dural Puncture Epidural technique using 27 G Whitacre needle
- DPE technique was performed in the sitting position at the L3/4 or L4/5 interspace via the midline approach using a 17-gauge Touhy needle and a loss of resistance to saline technique, then the dura was punctured with a 25-gauge pencil point Whitacre spinal needles using a needle-through-needle technique, and spontaneous flow of cerebrospinal fluid was confirmed, then the spinal needle was removed and a flexible 19-gauge, spring closed-tip catheter was inserted 5 cm into the epidural space toward the cranial side.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
was the onset time to surgical anesthesia
Time Frame: up to 20 minutes after local anesthetic injection
was defined as the time from the end of the intraoperative epidural test dose injection [the start of epidural extension anaesthesia (time zero on the stopwatch)] to when the sensory block level reached the T6 dermatome bilaterally (when the patient could no longer feel sharp sensation at T6) (assessed bilaterally at the midclavicular line)
up to 20 minutes after local anesthetic injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 6, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 8, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 14, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 14, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 28, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 20, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IF-2023

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia, Obstetric

Clinical Trials on Dural Puncture Epidural technique using pencil-point 27G Whitacre needle

Subscribe