Reliability of Ultrasound Metrics Used in Hip Dysplasia Diagnostics - a Prospective Study

February 6, 2026 updated by: Hans-Christen Husum, Aarhus University Hospital

Several measurements are used to evaluate hip dysplasia in hip ultrasound of children. Despite having being used since the 1980s, reliability studies have failed to find acceptable reliaiblity values for the gold standard ultrasound methods.

This study will evaluate three ultrasound measurement methodologies in a high quality controlled setting, to investigate the best achieveable reliability and agreement of the investigated measurements used in hip dysplasia diagnostics.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In DDH diagnostics, measurements of acetabular alpha angles and femoral head coverages (FHC), developed by Graf and Harcke/Terjesen respectively, have been gold standard since the 1980s. Despite their widespread use, the reliability of these measurements has been questioned due to the relative complexity of acquiring the necessary corIDrect frontal 2D plane or "standard plane". In the only meta-analysis of the reliability of ultrasound (US) metrics in dysplasia, the interrater reliability of the alpha angles was mediocre while the reliability of the FHC was poor. Critics of these findings however argue that the low reliability reported in studies are due to misinterpretation and misapplication of the Graf method.

The pubo-femoral distance (PFD) was proposed in 2013 as a new measurement for assessing DDH, while the reliability is reportedly higher than the gold standard US methods, it has never been directly compared to these.

This study aims to evaluate the inter- and intrarater reliability of Graf's alpha and beta angles, the FHC and PFD in children referred for hip US in a selective ultrasound screening program for DDH.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

74

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aarhus, Denmark, 8200
        • Aarhus University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children referred to the radiological outpatient at AUH for hip ultrasound examination, suspect of DDH.
  • Children receiving follow-up ultrasound for previously diagnosed DDH

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children deemed too agitated to participate in hip US with double measurements by two radiologists.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Double measurements
All included children will have double measurements of the investigated ultrasound methodologies performed by two separate musculoskeletal radiologists.
See earlier

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reliability and agreement in Alpha/Beta angles, Femoral head coverage and Pubo-femoral distance
Time Frame: Ultrasound measurements collected during the ultrasound examination by both radiologists

For all included ultrasound measurement methods the following will be reported:

Inter- and intrarater reliability will be evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and interpreted with ICC values between 0-0.5, 0.5-0.75, 0.75-0.9 and above 0.9 indicating poor, moderate, good and excellent reliability respectively.

Agreement will be evaluated using Bland-Altman plots (to check for systematic bias) and mean absolute measurement differences between raters.

Ultrasound measurements collected during the ultrasound examination by both radiologists

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 27, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 7, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

February 7, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 31, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Study protocol, analysis plan, and analytic code will be available upon written request to the first author.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After study has been published (expected end 2024)

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

upon written request to the first author.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Clinical Trials on Repeat hip ultrasound measurements

Subscribe