Mobile Micro-course Impact on Perioperative RNs in Heart Surgery Nursing.

September 1, 2024 updated by: Ting-Fang Yeh

The Effects of Heart Surgery Nursing Mobile Micro-course in Perioperative Registered Nurse.

The goal of this clinical trialis to compare in learning effectiveness of nurses. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Can the "Micro-course" teaching enhance the awareness of cardiac surgery nursing among operating room nurses?
  2. Can the "Micro-course" teaching boost the learning motivation and engagement of operating room nurses?
  3. What is the satisfaction level of nurses regarding the use of "Micro-course" in cardiac surgery nursing?
  4. What are the relevant factors influencing the effectiveness of the "Micro-course" teaching intervention?

Participants will be divided into two groups. The control group will receive online presentations, while the experimental group will engage in mobile learning combined with micro-courses. Both groups of participants will undergo instruction through asynchronous online courses.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

74

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taoyuan City, Taiwan, 33305
        • ChangGungMH

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Currently engaged in clinical surgical nursing and possess a valid nursing license.
  2. Individuals who have not received training for cardiac surgery scrub nursing or who have received such training but have not worked as a cardiac surgery scrub nurse for more than two years.
  3. Nurses involved in the collaborative use of personnel during operating room duty.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Nursing supervisors at the level of charge nurse or higher.
  2. Nurses exclusively engaged in local anesthesia surgical nursing.
  3. Nurses primarily engaged in waiting room, recovery room, and anesthesia nursing.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: micro-course
The experimental group adopts micro-course instruction, providing self-directed learning through online asynchronous courses, with instructional content delivered through short videos created by the researcher.
The experimental group adopts micro-course instruction, providing self-directed learning through online asynchronous courses, with instructional content delivered through short videos created by the researcher.
Active Comparator: slide presentation
The control group, on the other hand, employs a unidirectional teaching method by the instructor, offering self-directed learning through online asynchronous courses, primarily using researcher-created online presentations.
Provide online presentations.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive scale
Time Frame: Before the experiment commenced, all participants underwent a uniform pre-test. A post-test was administered one week after the conclusion of the course. A second post-test was conducted four weeks after the course concluded (this served as a delayed ass
The cognitive scale was self-designed by the author after referencing textbooks and journal articles. It is divided into four dimensions based on teaching topics, with a total of 15 single-choice questions to assess nurses' cognition of cardiac surgery. Each correct answer earns 1 point, with higher scores indicating higher levels of cognition.
Before the experiment commenced, all participants underwent a uniform pre-test. A post-test was administered one week after the conclusion of the course. A second post-test was conducted four weeks after the course concluded (this served as a delayed ass
motivation scale
Time Frame: Before the experiment started, all participants underwent a standardized pre-test. A post-test was conducted one week after the conclusion of the course
The scale consists of 12 items and employs a four-point Likert scale for scoring, ranging from 4 points for "strongly agree" to 1 point for "strongly disagree." Higher scores indicate stronger learning motivation.
Before the experiment started, all participants underwent a standardized pre-test. A post-test was conducted one week after the conclusion of the course
Engagement Scale
Time Frame: One week after the course concluded, measurements were taken.
This scale comprises a total of 10 items, scored using a four-point Likert scale, ranging from 4 points for "strongly agree" to 1 point for "strongly disagree." Higher scores indicate a higher level of learning engagement among the research subjects.
One week after the course concluded, measurements were taken.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
learning satisfaction
Time Frame: One week after the course concluded, measurements were taken.
There are a total of 10 questions, along with 2 open-ended questions. Scoring for this scale is based on a four-point Likert scale, ranging from 4 points for "strongly agree" to 1 point for "strongly disagree." Higher scores indicate higher levels of satisfaction with learning among nurses.
One week after the course concluded, measurements were taken.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ting-Fang Yeh, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
  • Study Director: Chien-Lin Kuo, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences
  • Study Chair: Chin-Chih Wu, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
  • Study Chair: Chi Wang, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 202301775B1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Surgical Procedures

Clinical Trials on micro-course

Subscribe