Transfoveal Micropulse Laser for Center Involving Diabetic Macular Edema

May 15, 2020 updated by: Ahmed Abdelbaki, Cairo University

Yellow Micropulse Laser 577-nm vs Infrared Diode Micropulse Laser 810-nm for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is currently the mainstay of treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME). One of the main obstacles of anti-VEGF therapy is the need of repeated injections, which carries both economic and compliance problems to the patients.there is a growing evidence that recognises the effectiveness of the use of micropulse laser (MPL) in treatment of DME. with MPL, it is possible to deliver a subthreshold laser that is above the threshold of biochemical effect but below the threshold of a visible, destructive lesion thereby preventing collateral damage.The MPL technique is available at near - infrared 810 nm diode laser (diode MPL) and at 577 nm (yellow MPL). The current study was conducted in order to compare the efficacy of both MPL techniques in the treatment of center involving DME.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This was a prospective randomized comparative study that included 30 eyes of 15 patients with bilateral DME. The patients were recruited from the Retina Clinic at Kasr Al Ainy Hospital, Cairo University. The study's protocol was reviewed and approved by board of the ophthalmology department, Cairo University, and was in concordance with the tents of Declaration of Helsinki. Eligible patients were informed about the study's objectives, methodology, risks and benefits. A written informed consent was obtained from every patient included in this study.Preliminary examination was in the form of slit-lamp examination, fundus examination, intra ocular pressure measurement, and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement. A spectral domain optical coherence tomogram (OCT) scan was performed to all patients before treatment to measure the central retinal thickness (CRT). The eyes were randomized into two groups; one eye (right eye) of each patient was treated with 577-nm yellow MPL and the other eye (left eye) of the same patient with Infrared 810-nm diode MPL. Changes in the BCVA and CRT were measured after treatment at 1 and 3 months of follow up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 11562
        • Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • bilateral diabetic macular edema
  • center involving confirmed by Optical coherence tomogram (OCT)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • any non-diabetic macular edema
  • significant media opacities
  • previous laser treatment, any intraocular surgery within the past 6 months
  • previous intravitreal injections of any drug within the past 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Yellow MPL
applying 577-nm yellow laser in a micro-pulse mode over the macular area including the fovea
Active Comparator: Diode MPL
applying 810-nm infra-red diode laser in a micro-pulse mode over the macular area including the fovea

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT)
Time Frame: baseline, at 1 month and 3 months after the intervention
detecting changes in the thickness of the center of the macula
baseline, at 1 month and 3 months after the intervention
Change in the Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)
Time Frame: baseline, at 1 month and 3 months after the intervention
detecting changes in the the best corrected visual acuity in logMAR. A LogMAR chart comprises rows of letters and is used by ophthalmologists, optometrists and vision scientists to estimate visual acuity. This chart was developed at the National Vision Research Institute of Australia in 1976, and is designed to enable a more accurate estimate of acuity than do other charts (e.g., the Snellen chart). For this reason, the LogMAR chart is recommended, particularly in a research setting. A Snellen score of 6/6 (20/20), indicating that an observer can resolve details as small as 1 minute of visual angle, corresponds to a LogMAR of 0 (since the base-10 logarithm of 1 is 0); a Snellen score of 6/12 (20/40), indicating an observer can resolve details as small as 2 minutes of visual angle, corresponds to a LogMAR of 0.3 (since the base-10 logarithm of 2 is near-approximately 0.3), and so on.Therefore, a higher logMAR scores mean a worse outcome.
baseline, at 1 month and 3 months after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Hany S Hamza, MD, Cairo University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 22, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 25, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

September 25, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Sharing Time Frame

starting 6 months after publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Individual participant data (IPD) can be shared with researchers who are planning to conduct a similar study. Requests can be sent to the central contacts by email

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Retinopathy

Clinical Trials on Yellow micro-pulse laser

3
Subscribe