Efficacy of Micro-excisional Skin Removal by Micro-coring Device in Treatment of Wrinkles and Laxity of Face and Neck (MCD)

July 10, 2018 updated by: Cytrellis Biosystems, Inc.

A Prospective, Multi-center, Pilot Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Micro-Excisional Skin Remodeling With Micro-Coring Device in the Treatment of Wrinkles and Skin Laxity of Face and Neck

This is a prospective, multi-center, pilot study evaluating effectiveness of micro-excisional skin remodeling by micro-coring skin in subjects meeting the Inclusion Criteria. Subjects will undergo bilateral treatment on the face and neck (upper and lower cheek, upper and lower lip, periocular and perioral areas, submandibular and middle neck, etc). The exact treatment area(s), choice of treatment density are left to the Investigator's discretion and subject's consent. Up to 3 treatments are allowed with a minimum of 30-day between the consecutive treatments.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The study will enroll up to 50 subjects at 6-8 investigational sites. It will evaluating effectiveness of a micro-coring device for micro-excisional skin remodeling in subjects with moderate to severe wrinkles of face and neck who meet the Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria. The choice of treatment density is at the investigator's discretion with the subject's consent. Up to 3 treatments may be performed with a minimum of 30-day interval between the consecutive treatments. Subjects will undergo bilateral micro-coring of skin on the face and upper neck, including but not limited to upper and lower cheek, upper and lower lip, periocular and perioral areas, submandibular and upper neck. The exact area(s) of treatment are left to the Investigator's discretion and subject's consent.

The subjects will be evaluated at each visit and following data will be collected:

  • The incidence and severity of systemic and local adverse events.
  • Wrinkle severity score assessed using the Lemperle Wrinkle Severity Scale.
  • Changes in skin laxity assessed by Laxity Scale.
  • Canfield Image Analyses.
  • Needle and/or punch biopsy (in some subjects).
  • Overall aesthetic improvement using the following scales:
  • Subject and PI Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
  • Subject Satisfaction Scale
  • Rhytides and Laxity Scale
  • Lower face assessment
  • Investigator evaluation of device usability and functionality. Data Analysis: Analyses will be conducted per measurement tools listed. Statistical analysis will include but will not be limited to T tests, univariate and multivariate analysis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95816
        • Laser and Skin Surgery Center of Northern California
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33173
        • Miami Dermatology and Laser Institute
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • Laser and Skin Surgery Center of New York
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37203
        • The Practice of Brian S. Biesman, M.D
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75231
        • Dr A Jay Burns Cosmetic Surgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fitzpatrick Skin Type 1, 2, or 3 as judged by the Investigator
  • Two or more of the following: Facial wrinkles assessed using the Lemperle Wrinkle Assessment Scale (descriptive and pictorial)

    • Cheek fold lines >2
    • Upper lip lines >3
    • Nasolabial Folds >3
    • Marionette lines >3
    • Labiomental crease >3
    • Corner of the mouth lines >3
    • Periocular lines >3
  • Able to provide written informed consent, understand and willing to comply with all study related directions from investigator and follow-up visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lesions suspicious for any malignancy or the presence of actinic keratosis, melasma, vitiligo, cutaneous papules/nodules or active inflammatory lesions in the areas to be treated
  • History of keloid formation or hypertrophic scarring
  • History of trauma or surgery to the treatment areas in the past 6 months
  • Scar present in the areas to be treated
  • Silicone or synthetic material injections in the areas to be treated
  • Injection of FDA-approved dermal fillers in the past two years
  • Injection of fat in the past year
  • History of treatment with dermabrasion, ablative laser, or radiofrequency in the past year
  • History of treatment with non-ablative laser in the past 6 months
  • History of treatment with botulinum toxin injections in the areas to be treated within the prior 6 months
  • Active smokers (0.5 pack/day) or having quit within 3 months prior to treatment
  • Active, chronic, or recurrent infection
  • History of compromised immune system or currently being treated with immunosuppressive agents
  • History of sensitivity to analgesic agents, Aquaphor®, topical or local anesthetics (e.g., lidocaine, benzocaine, procaine) or chlorhexidine, povidone-iodine or epinephrine
  • Excessive sun exposure and use of tanning beds or tanning creams within 30 days prior to treatment
  • Treatment with aspirin or other blood thinning agents within 14 days prior to treatment
  • History or presence of any clinically significant bleeding disorder
  • Co-morbid condition that in the Investigator's opinion could limit ability to participate in the study or to comply with follow-up requirements
  • History of drug and/or alcohol abuse
  • Any issue that, at the discretion of the Investigator, would interfere with assessment of safety or efficacy or compromise the subject's ability to undergo study procedures or give informed consent
  • Treatment with an investigational device or agent within 30 days before treatment or during the study period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Highthroughput Micro Coring Device
Skin excision and removal with with Highthroughput Micro Coring device
Assess Safety and Efficacy for skin treatments through micro-excisional skin removal with micro-coring device
Other Names:
  • skin micro-coring

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assess wrinkle reduction for moderate to severe wrinkles at 90 days post treatment based on the Lemperle Wrinkle Scale
Time Frame: 90-day post-treatment
Assess wrinkle reduction in wrinkle severity score from the baseline assessed by Independent Reviewer(s) using the Lemperle Wrinkle Severity Scale. No wrinkles = 0; Just perceptible wrinkles = 1; Shallow wrinkles = 2; Moderately deep wrinkles = 3; Deep wrinkles, well-defined edges = 4; Very deep wrinkles, redundant fold = 5
90-day post-treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assess skin laxity Improvement at 90 days post treatment
Time Frame: 90-day post-treatment
Improvement in skin laxity score from the baseline assessed by Independent Reviewer using Laxity Scale and supplemented by the Canfield Image Analyses. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale: 3 Very Much Improved; 2 Much Improved; 1 Improved; 0 No Change; - 1 Worse; - 2 Much Worse; -3 Very Much Worse.
90-day post-treatment
Assess skin for new collagenases
Time Frame: 60, 90, 180-day post treatment
Histological changes in treated skin when compared to untreated skin consistent with new collagenases
60, 90, 180-day post treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Patricia E Krantz, MBA, Cytrellis Biosystems, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 13, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

June 13, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 16, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 12, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 12, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Optimization of MCD treatment
  • AIS 700-00022 (Other Identifier: Cytrellis Biosystems, Inc.)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Laxity; Skin

Clinical Trials on HighThroughput Micro Coring Device

Subscribe