Effect of PPV+ILM Peeling +/- Subretinal Injection of Ringer Lactate in Management of Nontractional Refractory DME

August 3, 2024 updated by: Ain Shams University

Comparative Study Between Pars Plana Vitrectomy With Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling With or Without Planned Foveal Detachment for Management of Non-tractional Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined pars plana vitrectomy and planned foveal detachment through subretinal injection of ringer's solution in patients with non-tractional refractory diabetic macular edema.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In non-tractional cases, PPV allows a more efficient clearance of VEGF and other cytokines from the retina and improves retinal oxygenation by promotion of intraocular fluid currents, and relief of any subclinical tractional forces, thereby reducing DME.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined pars plana vitrectomy and planned foveal detachment through subretinal injection of ringer's solution in patients with non-tractional refractory diabetic macular edema.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Ain shams university

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: above 40 years old.

    • Patients with type two diabetes mellitus of more than 5 years duration.
    • Patients with Best corrected visual acuity better than 3/60.
    • Central macular thickness (CMT) of more than 250 μm despite undergoing six monthly injection of anti-VEGF therapy or corticosteroid or less than 10% reduction in CMT at the last follow up visit.
    • No evidence of vitreomacular traction.
    • Lens status: Pseudophakia or clear crystalline lens.

Exclusion Criteria:

Other causes of macular edema (intraocular inflammation, retinal vein occlusion, Irvin-gass syndrome, pharmacological).

  • Ischemic maculopathy by FFA.
  • Presence of bad prognostic signs in OCT such as disorganization of inner retinal layers (DRIL) and extensive disruption of IS-OS junction subfoveally.
  • Presence of apparent retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) atrophy at or near the macula.
  • Presence of proliferative diabetic fibrovascular membranes threatening or at the macula.
  • Presence of diabetic optic atrophy or neuropathy.
  • Presence of neovascular glaucoma.
  • Cataractous lens either preoperatively or as intra or postoperative complication.
  • Vitrectomized Eyes.
  • A prior intraocular surgery within the past six-months.
  • Lost follow up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: subjecting to vitrectomy + ILM peeling only
vitrectomy + ILM peeling +/- planned foveal detachment via subretinal injection of ringer's solution.
Active Comparator: subjecting to vitrectomy + ILM peeling + planned foveal detachment
vitrectomy + ILM peeling +/- planned foveal detachment via subretinal injection of ringer's solution.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in CMT by OCT at final visit
Time Frame: after 1 month and 3 months
decrease or increase in central macular thickness by OCT
after 1 month and 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in BCVA at final visit
Time Frame: after 1 month and 3 months
decrease or increase in best corrected visual acuity
after 1 month and 3 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
any surgical complication or recurrence of DME
Time Frame: after 1 month and 3 months
after 1 month and 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Abdelrahman G Salman, MD, professor at Ain Shams university

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 30, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Efficacy

Subscribe