MWM Technique in Patients With Knee OA

July 30, 2024 updated by: Emine Atıcı, Okan University

Effects of Mulligan Mobilization With Movement (MWM) Technique in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of the MWM technique on pain, normal joint movement, proprioception and quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of the MWM technique on pain, normal joint movement, muscle strength, proprioception, mobility, balance, functionality and quality of life in patients with knee OA.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • İstanbul
      • Tuzla, İstanbul, Turkey
        • Emine Atıcı

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • being diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis,
  • being diagnosed with knee OA at the earliest 6 months ago

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who were pregnant,
  • had knee surgery, had an infection,
  • had a pacemaker, had an infraction,
  • had cancer, or were receiving corticosteroid treatment were excluded from the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MWM group
Participants in group 2 will receive MWM technique treatment 3 times a week for 4 weeks. The patient should lie face down with a pillow over the knee and the physiotherapist should stand on the contralateral side for the application. The physiotherapist passes the belt around the waist to the patient's tibia edge. The knee is stabilized with one hand while the leg is supported with the other hand. The knee is moved medially without applying too much force through the belt and the patient is asked to stretch. If there is no pain, the movement is indicated. If pain occurs during the movement, the same procedure is performed for the lateral side by changing the position. It is important that the arch remains horizontal and does not cause rotation of the hip. The movement will be repeated 3 times at the point where there is no pain.
Mobilization Technique
No Intervention: Control Group

Participants in group 1 will receive conservative treatment 3 times a week for 4 weeks. Conservative treatment includes hot packs and traditional transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), an electrotherapy.

All participants in the study will receive 20 minutes of hot pack application to the knee area each session by a physiotherapist. All participants in the study will receive TENS for 20 minutes each session from the physiotherapist, who will place personalized electrodes around the knee joint and adjust the current to the level the person can tolerate.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 4 week change in pain intensity
VAS, which digitizes parameter values that cannot be measured numerically, was used to evaluate the pain intensity of the participants. The two extreme values of the parameter to be measured are written on the scale as 0 and 10. The person is asked to mark the value that best suits him/her on the scale. For pain, no pain and very severe pain; It is specified as 0 and 10. The person chooses a value according to his/her pain
4 week change in pain intensity
Short form-36 (SF-36)
Time Frame: 4-week change in quality of life
SF-36, developed in 1992, consists of 36 items providing measurement to the following 8 dimensions: physical functioning (10 items), social functioning (2 items), role limitations due to physical problems (4 items), role limitations due to emotional problems (3 items), mental health (5 items), energy/vitality (4 items), pain (2 items), and general health perception (5 items). An increase in the score indicates a higher rate of improvement in health status.
4-week change in quality of life
Western Ontario and Mcmaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
Time Frame: 4-week
This survey is conducted to evaluate how much the routine activities in the participants' lives are affected by the knee problem. The survey included the following parameters: pain, physical function, and stiffness. A Likert system ranging from 1 to 5 is used. As the value increases, the intensity of the parameters increases
4-week
Evaluation of proprioception
Time Frame: 4-week change in proprioception
To assess the participants' sense of proprioception, the method of actively reproducing the passive position without supporting the limb was used. In this assessment, where the angle is measured with a goniometer, the person closes their eyes. The limb is passively moved to the target angle and the person is asked to concentrate on the position. After 10 seconds, the starting point of the movement is returned. The person tries to find the target angle by actively moving the same limb. If the angle achieved at the end of the movement is different from the target angle, the difference is recorded as the deviation angle (used to 15° and 45° knee flexion).
4-week change in proprioception
The range of motion
Time Frame: 4-week
A goniometer (Baseline plastic goniometer), which provides numerical and objective results, was used to measure the range of motion of the participants. Knee flexion for normal range of motion in the knee region and knee extension angles were evaluated.
4-week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 6, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 5, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 012 (Other Identifier: Nahrain Medical Research Collective (NMRC))

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mobilization

Clinical Trials on Mulligan Mobilization with Movement Technique

Subscribe