Quality of Life After Treatment for Bladder Cancer: The Bladder Cancer Survivorship Study

April 14, 2026 updated by: Mayo Clinic
This study evaluates the effect of bladder cancer treatment on quality of life.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare general and disease-specific quality of life outcomes at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after treatment for localized bladder cancer using the PROMIS-29 and the Bladder Cancer Index (BCI) respectively.

II. To identify patient level characteristics that may influence quality of life outcomes after treatment for localized bladder cancer.

OUTLINE: This is an observational study.

Patients complete surveys and also have their medical records reviewed on study.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

204

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85259
        • Mayo Clinic in Arizona
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32224-9980
        • Mayo Clinic in Florida
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Men and women diagnosed with clinically localized bladder cancer

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have pathologically confirmed, clinically localized, bladder cancer
  • Be willing to complete a survey in English before starting definitive treatment (surgery or radiation);
  • Able to give consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Does not meet inclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Observational
Patients complete surveys and also have their medical records reviewed on study.
Non-Interventional Study

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in quality of life outcomes - PROMIS-29
Time Frame: At baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months
Assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29, a 29-item instrument with 29 questions in eight categories of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL): physical function, sleep disturbance, pain interference and pain intensity, fatigue, anxiety, depression) and ability to participate in social roles and activities. Questions are answered on a 5-point scale with varying responses assigned to the scale based on the category/question.
At baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months
Change in quality of life outcomes - Bladder Cancer Index
Time Frame: At baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months
Assessed using the Bladder Cancer Index (BCI). The BCI consists of 36 items, with 4- or 5-point Likert response scales for each item, covering 3 primary domains: urinary (14 items), bowel (10 items), and sexual (12 items). The items focus on the frequency of the disease symptoms, with answer scales such as: "Never, rarely, about half the time, usually, or always".
At baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months
Patient level characteristics
Time Frame: At baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after treatment
Will be assessed by the effect of race/ethnicity, comorbid conditions, education level, gender, and age on patient reported outcomes. Interactions between intervention type and patient-level characteristics will be included. The distributions of variables will be summarized graphically and numerically.
At baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mark D. Tyson, M.D., M.P.H., Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 12, 2018

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 2, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 18-004675 (Other Identifier: Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board)
  • NCI-2024-00973 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stage 0a Bladder Cancer AJCC v8

Clinical Trials on Non-Interventional Study

Subscribe