Comparative Study of Through Knee Amputation Versus Above Knee Amputation Regarding Infection Rate and Function

April 12, 2024 updated by: Ahmed Mohammed Adly Omar, Assiut University
The aim of this study is to search and compare outcomes of through knee amputation (TKA) and above knee amputation (AKA) in terms of Technique ,wound healing ,infection rate , function and ambulation

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Severe peripheral arterial disease with or without comorbid diabetes mellitus accounts for the majority of patients requiring major lower extremity amputations.

There is also an association between major extremity amputation and lower socio-economic status, attributed to lifestyle and comorbidities, living and working conditions, psychosocial factors, and access to affordable healthcare.

With a transfemoral prosthesis, the amputee weight bears through their ischial tuberosity which can cause discomfort when standing or ambulating. These challenges have been associated with greater abandonment of prosthesis use. An often over looked alternative within amputation surgery is through knee amputation (TKA), which currently comprises less than 5% of all major lower extremity amputations.

Compared with AKA, TKA is a less traumatic procedure with little disruption to thigh muscles, articular cartilage, menisci, and bone (especially with Knee Disarticulation), which in turn reduces post-operative infection and formation of bone spurs.

In contrast, AKA can also provide additional problems. Due to a shorter lever length of the residuum, the unilateral transfemoral amputee requires three times more energy to ambulate with a prosthetic limb compared with a unilateral transtibial amputee.

Among vascular surgeons, TKA is similarly rarely performed. Fear of poor wound healing and potential stump breakdown in longer soft tissue flaps needed to cover epicondyles of the distal femur are possible preconceived misconceptions. Historically, outcomes after TKA are acceptable, but scarce vascular literature exists reporting contemporary outcomes of TKA.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Critical limb ischemia with sever infection with no role For BKA
  • Acute late or total ischemia SFA with poor
  • popliteal signals and no distal run off
  • Infected Diabetic foot (DF) affecting heel and calf muscle with preserved knee joint
  • Traumatic gangrene

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Venous gangrene

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Through knee amputation
Amputation Technique
Amputation Technique
Active Comparator: Above knee Amputation
Amputation Technique
Amputation Technique

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wound healing rate
Time Frame: One year
Rates of healing of different amputees
One year
Incidence of infection
Time Frame: One year
One year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Function of the limb Rehabilitation Quality of life
Time Frame: Two years
Incidence of recurrence
Two years
Mortality rate
Time Frame: Tow years
Tow years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Ahmed Mu Nagy, Assiut University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 22, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

April 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

April 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Through knee amputation

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Amputation of Knee

Clinical Trials on Through knee amputation

Subscribe