The Safety and Efficacy Study of Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA) Ophthalmic Solution in Patients With Loss of Contrast Sensitivity Due to Age-Related, Low-Grade Nuclear Cataract

April 12, 2024 updated by: Livionex Inc.

A Phase 1/2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Masked, Multicenter, Dose-Ranging, Safety and Efficacy of C-KAD Ophthalmic Solution in Patients With Loss of Contrast Sensitivity Due to Age-Related, Low-Grade Nuclear Cataract

The study objectives were:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of EDTA 1.3% and 2.6% ophthalmic solution (C-KAD) in improving visual function as assessed by contrast sensitivity;
  • To evaluate the safety and tolerability of two doses of EDTA ophthalmic solution (C-KAD); and
  • To determine the optimal clinical dose of EDTA ophthalmic solution (C-KAD) which to proceed into pivotal study(s).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This was a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked, parallel evaluation of the safety and efficacy of EDTA ophthalmic solution in patients with loss of contrast sensitivity due to age-related, low-grade cataract.

111 subjects were enrolled at six study sites within the U.S. and randomly assigned in 1:1:1 ratio to treatment with 2.6% C-KAD, 1.3% C-KAD and placebo. The treatment duration was 120 days with a run-in period and follow-up period of 14 days each.

During the Run-in Period, patients received pre-treatment with lubricating eye drops (Refresh® Plus Lubricant Eye Drops) in both eyes to ensure uniformity in the level of ocular hydration at Baseline in patients randomized into the study.

Patients were evaluated at a Screening Visit (Day -14), at Baseline (Day 0), during the dosing period (Days 30, 60, 90, 120) and at the Follow-up Visit (Day 134), two weeks after completion of active treatment.

Tolerability and efficacy were assessed by Slit Lamp and Fundus Examinations, Best-Corrected Distance Visual Acuity, Contrast Sensitivity, Endothelial Cell Count, Pentacam Imaging, Tear Film Break-Up Time, IOP measurements, Pupil Size measurement and evaluation of Adverse Events.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

111

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94117
        • St Mary's Eye Specialists, Inc.
    • Kansas
      • Overland Park, Kansas, United States, 66210
        • Hunkeler Eye Institute
    • Maryland
      • Lutherville, Maryland, United States, 21093
        • The Johns Hopkins Hospital & Health System, Wilmer Eye Institute
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28210
        • Charlotte Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Associates
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84132
        • University of Utah, John Moran Eye Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female patients ≥ 50 years of age
  • Presence of early nuclear sclerosis cataract in both eyes below the level recommended for surgical replacement
  • Both eyes having contrast sensitivity measurements of:

    • Screening Visit:
    • Less than or equal to 6, 4 and 4 in spatial frequencies C, D and E, respectively under mesopic illumination
    • Baseline Visit:
    • Less than or equal to 6, 4 and 4 in spatial frequencies C, D and E, respectively under mesopic illumination and
    • Greater than 0 in all five spatial frequencies (Patches A, B, C, D and E) under photopic illumination
  • Best-Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) measurement by ETDRS of better than or equal to 20/50 in both eyes attributable to low- grade nuclear cataract
  • Patient must be willing and able to provide written informed consent
  • Patient must be willing and able to comply with study visits as described in the protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical evidence of any active ocular infection (i.e., bacterial, viral, parasitic or fungal) in either eye
  • History of herpetic ocular infection in either eye
  • Presence or history of glaucoma in either eye
  • Presence or history of intraocular pressure of >22 mm Hg in either eye
  • Amblyopia in either eye
  • Presence of any corneal disorder including pterygium or superficial keratitis
  • Dry eyes which require the use of a prescription medication
  • Presence of posterior subcapsular cataract
  • Presence of cortical cataract that intrudes within the central 4mm of the lens
  • Presence or history of any ocular inflammatory disorder in either eye (e.g., uveitis, ocular allergies)
  • Patients with known allergies to EDTA preservatives
  • Presence of any optic nerve or retinal disorders including, but not limited to, age-related macular degeneration, optic neuropathy, etc. in either eye
  • Prior intraocular, refractive and/or laser surgery of any type in either eye
  • Anticipated need for ocular surgery in either eye within six months of study enrollment
  • History of diabetes
  • Pseudo-exfoliation syndrome
  • Contact lens use (soft contact lens wear within 2 weeks of the date of randomization, rigid lens wear within three months of the date of randomization. No contact lens use throughout duration of the study)
  • Current use or anticipated use of any ocular medications (over-the- counter or prescription). Use of topical ophthalmic drugs should be discontinued 14 days prior to enrollment into the treatment arm of the study
  • Current or anticipated use of any systemic or ocular steroids or chronic use of topical steroids within 30 days of study enrollment
  • Females who are pregnant, lactating or pre- or peri menopausal and unwilling to use adequate birth control for the duration of the study
  • Participation in an investigational device or drug trial within the last 30 day
  • Presence of any condition, abnormality or situation at Screening or at Baseline that in the opinion of the Principal Investigator may preclude the patient's ability to comply with study requirements, including completion of the study or the quality of the data

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: C-KAD 2.6%
Administered four times a day (QID; no less than 3 hours apart) in both eyes for 120 days
Other Names:
  • C-KAD 2.6%
Experimental: C-KAD 1.3%
Administered four times a day (QID; no less than 3 hours apart) in both eyes for 120 days
Other Names:
  • C-KAD 1.3%
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Administered four times a day (QID; no less than 3 hours apart) in both eyes for 120 days
Other Names:
  • Software Saline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Contrast Sensitivity (Mesopic) Responder Analysis
Time Frame: Baseline, Days 30, 60, 90, and 120
Proportion of patients with ≥ 2-patch (0.30 logCS) contrast sensitivity improvement in at least two spatial frequencies under mesopic illumination
Baseline, Days 30, 60, 90, and 120

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cumulative Improvement in Contrast Sensitivity (Mesopic)
Time Frame: Baseline, Days 30, 60, 90, and 120
total changes in patches of contrast sensitivity measurements across all five spatial frequencies (1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree)
Baseline, Days 30, 60, 90, and 120

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change in Contrast Sensitivity (Mesopic)
Time Frame: Baseline, Days 30, 60, 90, and 120
Mean change in contrast sensitivity from baseline under mesopic illumination
Baseline, Days 30, 60, 90, and 120
Mean Change in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)
Time Frame: Baseline, Days 30, 60, 90, and 120
Mean change in BCVA from baseline using ETDRS charts
Baseline, Days 30, 60, 90, and 120
Pentacam Imaging
Time Frame: Baseline, Baseline, Days 120
Densitometric Analysis using Scheimpflug Images (substudy patients at a selected study site only)
Baseline, Baseline, Days 120

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 10, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Age Related Cataracts

Clinical Trials on EDTA Ophthalmic Solution 2.6%

Subscribe