Opioid-free Anesthesia as an Alternative to General Anesthesia in Abdominal Surgery

April 18, 2024 updated by: Tomasz Skladzien, Jagiellonian University

Due to the increasing number of reports of cancer progression in people undergoing surgery under general anesthesia using opioids, OFA is believed to have a favorable long-term prognostic effect, especially in cancer patients. The opioid-free protocol is also used in postoperative analgesia. It is estimated that up to 75% of surgical patients experience chronic postoperative pain, which has a particularly negative impact on the quality of life.

The investigators would like to compare pain during the first 48 postoperative hours of patients undergoing abdominal surgery who would be anesthetized with opioids and without opioids (patients would be randomly assigned to a group) (1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after operations). A secondary objective will be to measure total oxycodone consumption in the postoperative period in both groups. Other secondary objectives: assessment of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

All subsequent patients undergoing abdominal surgery will be randomly divided into two groups: one under completely opioid-free anesthesia (infusion of Ketamine, Lignocaine and Dexmedetomidine and inhalation of Desflurane) and the other group under combined general anesthesia (using an infusion of remifentanil intraoperatively). In the postoperative period, all patients will receive Oxycodone in a PCA pump or in the form of oral tablets [naloxone (naloxone hydrochloride) + oxycodone (oxycodone hydrochloride)] and co-analgesics in the form of Paracetamol and Metamizole. Opioid-free general anesthesia is a recognized method used during anesthesia. It allows participants to effectively control pain, reducing the number of complications associated with taking large doses of opioid drugs. It should be emphasized that it is approved for use in routine anesthetic practice, and whether such a technique will be used in a given patient depends only on the experience, knowledge and preferences of the anesthesiologist. It is used in everyday anesthetic practice, but there is no conclusive scientific data confirming its advantage in patients undergoing abdominal surgery, so currently it depends only on the individual experience, knowledge and preferences of the anesthesiologist whether such a technique will be used in a given patient.

Mulier et al. proposed an OFA scheme including the supply of dexmedetomidine, ketamine and lidocaine for the induction of anesthesia, which ensures sedation, analgesia and sympathomimetic therapy followed by simultaneous maintenance infusion of lidocaine and dexmedetomidine. The protocol proposed by Mulier et al. is widely used and accepted worldwide. Initially, it was used in patients undergoing bariatric procedures, and then for all types of surgical procedures.

In the postoperative period, patients will have their pain level assessed using the NRS scale 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours after the procedure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Malopolskie
      • Kraków, Malopolskie, Poland, 31501
        • Recruiting
        • Jagiellonian University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient's consent to participate in the study
  • surgery within the abdominal cavity

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient's refusal to participate in the study
  • inability to operate the PCA pump
  • not understanding how the NRS scale works
  • hypersensitivity to anesthetic drugs
  • 1st or 2nd degree heart block.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Opioid
general anesthesia (using remifentanil infusion intraoperatively). Standard monitoring during anaesthesia included arterial oxygen saturation, ECG, and non-invasive arterial blood pressure. Premedication was not used. The standard anaesthesia consisted of propofol (1.5-2 mg / kg body weight iv) and for induction. Infusion of remifentanil in a plasma target control infusion with a calculated plasma level of 1-6 ng/ml. Rocuronium (0.6 mg / kg body weight iv) was administered prior to intubation. AThe painkillers used would be metamizole, acetaminophen and oxycodone.
Experimental: OFA
completely anesthetized without opioids (infusion of Ketamine, Lignocaine and Dexmedetomidine. Standard monitoring during anaesthesia included arterial oxygen saturation, ECG, and non-invasive arterial blood pressure. Premedication was not used. The standard anaesthesia consisted of propofol (1.5-2 mg / kg body weight iv) and for induction. Rocuronium (0.6 mg / kg body weight iv) was administered prior to intubation. The painkillers used would be metamizole, acetaminophen and oxycodone.
Opioid free general anesthesia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain level
Time Frame: 2 days
comparison of differences in pain levels. The numeric rating scale (NRS) will be used, it is a pain screening tool, commonly used to assess pain severity at that moment in time using a 0-10 scale, with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable"
2 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total long acting opioid consumption in oxycodone equivalents
Time Frame: 2 days
the total dosage of given drug
2 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 16, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

We plan to share demografic data, type of surgery, score in NRS and opioid consumption dosage.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data will be available in 2026 for 1 year

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia, General

Clinical Trials on anesthesia without opioids

Subscribe