- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06382454
Upper Extremity Robot-Assisted Therapy in Stroke Patients
May 4, 2024 updated by: Izel Demirhan, Hacettepe University
Investigation of The Effect of Upper Extremity Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Extremity Performance in Stroke Patients
Upper extremity hemiparesis is one of the most common symptoms after stroke.
Robot-assisted therapies have been used as an approach to rehabilitation of upper extremity hemiplegia in recent years.
Robot-assisted therapy is an approach to post-stroke rehabilitation that uses robotic devices to provide motor or task-oriented training to patients.
When the literature is examined, there are studies showing that robot-assisted therapies are similar or superior to conventional methods.
In order to provide the most effective rehabilitation approach in upper extremity robots, it is suggested that it may be more accurate to consider the robotic device as a training platform consisting of various therapeutic techniques and principles, not as a tool alone.
A robotic system will be used to overcome the disadvantages of the existing robotic systems in the literature such as not providing support to the patient at the time of need, not providing fluidity in shoulder movements by not taking into account the scapulohumeral rhythm in upper extremity movements, long installation times, and ignoring task-oriented training.
The system to be used is a self-aligning exoskeleton system for robot-assisted upper extremity rehabilitation.
The system provides safe and versatile rehabilitation at increasing intensity and also allows for objective assessments.
The aim of this clinical study was to evaluate the efficacy of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation in stroke patients.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
40
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: İzel Demirhan, Msc
- Phone Number: +905379858812
- Email: izel.dmrhn16@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Ender Ayvat, Assoc. Prof.
Study Locations
-
-
Altındağ, Ankara
-
Ankara, Altındağ, Ankara, Turkey, 06100
- Hacettepe University, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Spasticity of the upper extremity muscles is 2 or less according to the Modified Ashworth Scale
- Stroke patients with a Mini Mental State Examination score of 24 and above will be included in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Have a neurological disease other than stroke that may affect upper extremity movements
- Surgery or botox application for upper extremity spasticity in the last 6 months
- History of upper extremity fracture or surgery
- Attending another rehabilitation program
- Individuals who do not agree to participate in the study and do not give written informed consent will be excluded from the study.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Treatment Group
30 minutes of individualized trunk, lower extremity and upper extremity exercises; the other 30 minutes will be treated with the robotic system.
In the robot-assisted treatment, a total of 12 movements will be used, including the movement patterns that patients have the most difficulty in daily life and two movement patterns used in the Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation approach.
Individual-specific rehabilitation program; individual-specific trunk, lower extremity and upper extremity exercises to be applied in both groups will consist of the following exercises according to the needs of the patients, and the degree of difficulty will be planned according to the needs of the patients.
All patients will be treated for 8 weeks, 3 days a week, 60 minutes a day.
|
30 minutes of individualized trunk, lower extremity and upper extremity exercises; the other 30 minutes will be treated with the robotic system.
In the robot-assisted treatment, a total of 12 movements will be used, including the movement patterns that patients have the most difficulty in daily life and two movement patterns used in the Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation approach.
Individual-specific rehabilitation program; individual-specific trunk, lower extremity and upper extremity exercises to be applied in both groups will consist of the following exercises according to the needs of the patients, and the degree of difficulty will be planned according to the needs of the patients.
All patients will be treated for 8 weeks, 3 days a week, 60 minutes a day.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Control Group
For 30 minutes, exercises including trunk, lower extremity and upper extremity exercises specific to the individual will be practiced, while the movement patterns to be used in the robotic system will be practiced in the other 30 minutes with the physiotherapist.
Individual-specific rehabilitation program; individual-specific trunk, lower extremity and upper extremity exercises to be applied in both groups will consist of the following exercises according to the needs of the patients, and the degree of difficulty will be planned according to the needs of the patients.
All patients will be treated for 8 weeks, 3 days a week, 60 minutes a day.
|
For 30 minutes, exercises including trunk, lower extremity and upper extremity exercises specific to the individual will be practiced, while the movement patterns to be used in the robotic system will be practiced in the other 30 minutes with the physiotherapist.
Individual-specific rehabilitation program; individual-specific trunk, lower extremity and upper extremity exercises to be applied in both groups will consist of the following exercises according to the needs of the patients, and the degree of difficulty will be planned according to the needs of the patients.
All patients will be treated for 8 weeks, 3 days a week, 60 minutes a day.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Modified Ashworth Scale
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
Spasticity of the patients will be evaluated with the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS).
The MAS, which assesses resistance to passive movement, is the most widely used method for the evaluation of muscle tone in the clinic.
Spasticity is graded as 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3 and 4 according to the resistance of the muscle.
|
5 minutes
|
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity
Time Frame: 15 minutes
|
The Fugl Meyer Assessment is a disease-specific assessment designed to evaluate motor function, balance, sensory qualities and joint function in individuals after stroke.
The scale consists of 5 sections: motor function, sensory function, balance (standing-sitting), range of motion and joint pain.
Scoring is based on the ability to complete each item using a 3-point ordinal scale, where 0 = cannot perform, 1 = partially perform and 2 = fully perform.
It is stated in the literature that the scale can also be divided.
Therefore, in our study, the upper extremity part of the scale will be used in the evaluation of upper extremity performance before and after treatment.
The total score that can be obtained from the Fugl Meyer Upper Extremity assessment is 66 and includes items evaluating joint movements, coordination-speed and reflex activities related to the shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist and hand.
|
15 minutes
|
|
Action Research Arm Test
Time Frame: 15 minutes
|
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) is a performance-based test that assesses upper extremity skills and functional level.
The test has 4 subgroups evaluating coarse grasping, fine grasping, fingertip grasping and gross movement and 19 evaluation items in total.
Scoring is between 0 and 3; 0 means 'movement cannot be performed at all' and 3 means 'performance is normal'.
For the test, objects of special sizes and shapes suitable for the relevant grasping styles are required.
|
15 minutes
|
|
Box and Block Test
Time Frame: 1 minutes
|
The Box and Block Test, which provides a measure of manual dexterity, is administered with two adjacent boxes with a 15.2 cm high partition between them.
One of the two boxes, both 53.7 x 25.4 x 8.5 cm in size, is filled with 150 wooden blocks of 2.5 cm3 each.
The patient should attempt to move the maximum number of blocks within 60 seconds by grasping each block and carrying it across the compartment to the other compartment.
|
1 minutes
|
|
Nine Hole Peg Test
Time Frame: 10 minutes
|
The test consists of a platform with 9 holes and 9 rods.
The platform will be placed directly in front of the individuals and the rods will be adjusted so that the rods are on the dominant hand side and the holes are on the non-dominant hand side.
After the test rules are explained to the individuals, the individuals will be given the opportunity to practice before the application.
Individuals will be asked to insert the rods on the board as fast as possible.
The test results will be recorded by measuring the time from the moment the individuals touch the first stick to the moment the last stick is attached to the platform with a stopwatch.
Then, they will be asked to remove the 9 bars one by one with the same hand and the removal time will be recorded.
The test will be performed for the non-dominant hand using the same method, but this time the platform will be rotated in front of the non-dominant hand.
|
10 minutes
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
ACTIVLIM
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
In the scale containing a total of 22 questions, the first 14 questions consist of activities involving adults and children.
Questions 15-18 include activities specific to adults and questions 19-22 include activities specific to children.
Since the study includes an adult group, the questionnaire including the first 18 questions will be applied to the stroke patients.
When applying the ACTIVLIM scale, individuals will be asked to answer by thinking about the last 3 months.
This questioning will be done in a way that the individual will be unassisted, independent of the extremity and strategy used.
The scale is scored between 0 and 2. "0" means impossible, "1" means difficult, "2" means easy.
Activities not performed in the last 3 months are not evaluated and the "question mark (?)" section is marked on the questionnaire page.
As a result of the questionnaire, low score means clinically worse activity level and high score means clinically better activity level.
|
5 minutes
|
|
ABILHAND Assessment
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
It is a scale that assesses the manual ability perceived by the individual in daily activities.
In our study, the 23-item version of the scale developed for individuals with chronic stroke and including bimanual activities will be used.
The scale has 23 items requiring the use of upper extremities and each item is scored as 0: impossible, 1: difficult, 2: easy.
Activities not performed in the last 3 months are not scored.
|
5 minutes
|
|
Stroke Impact Scale
Time Frame: 10 minutes
|
Stroke Impact Scale 3.0; this scale, which aims to assess the perception of quality of life after stroke by patients themselves or their carers, consists of 8 subsections and 59 questions.
Each question is scored by evaluating the difficulty experienced in the last week on a 5-point Likert scale.
The score for each section ranges from 0 to 100.
In addition to the 8 subsections, it also includes the evaluation of the perception of recovery after stroke with a 0-100 point visual analogue scale (0: No recovery, 100: Full recovery).
|
10 minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: Muhammed Kılınç, Prof., Hacettepe University
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
May 6, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 30, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 30, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 27, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 21, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
April 24, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 7, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 4, 2024
Last Verified
May 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- E2-23-5921
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stroke
-
National Assembly ClinicBayero University Kano, NigeriaRecruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke Ischemic | Hemiparesis After StrokeNigeria
-
University of PittsburghRecruitingHemorrhagic Stroke | Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source | Ischemic Stroke, Cryptogenic | Recurrent Ischemic Stroke | Ischemic Stroke, EmbolicUnited States
-
Mahidol UniversityNot yet recruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke SurvivorsThailand
-
Mahidol UniversityRecruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke PatientThailand
-
University Hospital, GhentRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicBelgium
-
Moleac Pte Ltd.Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, Cryptogenic
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedChronic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | ExoskeletonSouth Korea
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoRecruitingStroke, Ischemic | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke, CerebrovascularUnited States
-
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicItaly
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusScuola Superiore Sant'Anna di Pisa; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus...Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Upper Limb Rehabilitation | Stroke IschemicItaly
Clinical Trials on Assist-On Arm Robot Group
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedStroke | Gait, HemiplegicKorea, Republic of
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedHealth Behavior | Gait, UnsteadyKorea, Republic of
-
Samsung Medical CenterSamsung ElectronicsCompleted
-
New York Medical CollegeNew York University; National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication...Not yet recruitingStroke | Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction | Hemiparesis After StrokeUnited States
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalNational Science Council, Taiwan; National Health Research Institutes, TaiwanCompletedCerebrovascular AccidentTaiwan
-
New York Presbyterian HospitalNew York UniversityCompleted
-
National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, KoreaUnknown
-
Yonsei UniversityUnknown
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical UniversityNot yet recruitingAdvanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)