Clinical, Cognitive and Neural Effects of Potentiation of ECT by rTMS in Treatment-Resistant Depression (STIMAGNECT2)

April 25, 2024 updated by: Maud Rothärmel, Centre Hospitalier du Rouvray

Clinical, Cognitive and Neural Effect of Potentiation of Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) by Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) at 10 ECT in Patients With Characterized Pharmacoresistant Depressive Episode

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is one of the most effective treatments for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). However, due to response delay and cognitive impairment, ECT remains an imperfect treatment. In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study, our objective is to assess the priming effect of rTMS sessions before ECT on clinical, cognitive and neural response in patients with TRD.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

80 patients with TRD will be assigned to active or sham rTMS before ECT treatment. Five sessions of active/sham rTMS will be administered over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (20 Hz, 90% resting motor threshold, 20 2 s trains with 60-s intervals, 800 pulses/session) before ECT (which was active for all patients) started. Then, from the sixth ECT session, an rTMS session will occur the day before each ECT session. Clinical assessment, cognitive assessment and brain imaging (structural MRI, resting state functional MRI, MR spectroscopy) will take place before and after 10 ECT sessions. Clinical, cognitive and neural changes will be compared between both groups after 10 ECT sessions.

The primary outcome will be the response rate after 10 ECT, i.e. the percentage of patients who achieved a reduction of 50% or more from their initial Hamilton Depression Scale score (HAMD-21 items).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with Major Depressive Disorder according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) criteria
  • HAMD score ≥15
  • In case of unipolar disorder: no remission after at least two different antidepressants prescribed at a dose and duration sufficient for the current episode
  • In the case of bipolar disorder: no remission despite lithium at an adequate plasma level combined with lamotrigine or quetiapine monotherapy at full dose
  • No change of antidepressant or mood stabilizer treatment for at least 15 days
  • To be rTMS-naive
  • Without benzodiazepine or antiepileptic treatment for at least 15 days
  • To understand spoken and written French
  • Having given their informed, written consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), anesthesia
  • Patients who have received ECT in the last 6 months
  • Patients suffering from poorly stabilized epilepsy, serious neurological or systemic disorders
  • Patients with a serious substance use disorder (other than nicotine or caffeine) according to DSM-5 criteria
  • Patients suffering from severe hearing problems
  • Subjects already treated with an electrical or magnetic stimulation technique
  • Women who do not have adequate contraception, pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Being deprived of liberty by an administrative or judicial decision
  • Patients participating or having participated in an interventional clinical trial within 30 days before the inclusion visit

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Active rTMS group
5 active rTMS before starting ECT, then from the sixth ECT session, an active rTMS session will occur the day before each ECT session
rTMS will be administered over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (20 Hz, 90% resting motor threshold, 20 2 s trains with 60-s intervals, 800 pulses/session)
Placebo Comparator: Sham rTMS group
5 sham rTMS before starting ECT, then from the sixth ECT session, a sham rTMS session will occur the day before each ECT session
Sham rTMS will be administered over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Response rate after 10 ECT
Time Frame: Day 0 and Day 40
the percentage of patients who achieved a reduction of 50% or more from their initial Hamilton Depression Scale score (HAMD-21 items)
Day 0 and Day 40

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The relative improvement of depressive symptoms throughout the study (assessed by a clinician)
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 4, Day 19, Day 26, Day 40
the relative variation of HAMD-21
Day 0, Day 4, Day 19, Day 26, Day 40
The relative improvement of depressive symptoms throughout the study (self-reported)
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 4, Day 19, Day 26, Day 40
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology
Day 0, Day 4, Day 19, Day 26, Day 40
Adverse effects
Time Frame: Day 4, Day 19, Day 26, Day 40
Assessment of adverse effects with the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) side effects rating scale adapted to rTMS (adapted UKU)
Day 4, Day 19, Day 26, Day 40
Subjective assessment of memory
Time Frame: Day 4, Day 19, Day 26, Day 40
Scores and variations in memory assessed with the Squire Subjective Memory Questionnaire (SSMQ)
Day 4, Day 19, Day 26, Day 40
Subjective assessment of cognitive functioning
Time Frame: Day 4, Day 19, Day 26, Day 40
Scores and variations in cognitive functioning assessed with the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ)
Day 4, Day 19, Day 26, Day 40
Global cognitive functioning (objective)
Time Frame: Day 0 and Day 40
Scores and variations assessed with the Mini Mental Status Examination
Day 0 and Day 40
Verbal memory performances (objective)
Time Frame: Day 0 and Day 40
Scores and variations assessed with the RL/RI-16 test
Day 0 and Day 40
Attention (objective)
Time Frame: Day 0 and Day 40
Scores and variations assessed the D2 test of attention
Day 0 and Day 40
Visuospatial and constructional ability (objective)
Time Frame: Day 0 and Day 40
Scores and variations assessed with the Rey-Osterrieth complex figure test
Day 0 and Day 40
Autobiographical memory (objective)
Time Frame: Day 0 and Day 40
Scores and variations assessed with the autobiographical memory test (TEMPau)
Day 0 and Day 40
Seizure threshold
Time Frame: Day 5, Day 9, Day 11, Day 16, Day 18, Day 23, Day 25, Day 30, Day 32, Day 37
Seizure threshold during ECT
Day 5, Day 9, Day 11, Day 16, Day 18, Day 23, Day 25, Day 30, Day 32, Day 37
Seizure duration
Time Frame: Day 5, Day 9, Day 11, Day 16, Day 18, Day 23, Day 25, Day 30, Day 32, Day 37
Seizure duration during ECT
Day 5, Day 9, Day 11, Day 16, Day 18, Day 23, Day 25, Day 30, Day 32, Day 37
Postictal Suppression
Time Frame: Day 5, Day 9, Day 11, Day 16, Day 18, Day 23, Day 25, Day 30, Day 32, Day 37
Postictal Suppression during ECT
Day 5, Day 9, Day 11, Day 16, Day 18, Day 23, Day 25, Day 30, Day 32, Day 37
Dose of medication
Time Frame: Day 5, Day 9, Day 11, Day 16, Day 18, Day 23, Day 25, Day 30, Day 32, Day 37
Dose of medication during ECT
Day 5, Day 9, Day 11, Day 16, Day 18, Day 23, Day 25, Day 30, Day 32, Day 37
Changes in regional gray matter density
Time Frame: Day 0 and Day 40
Changes in regional gray matter density measured with 3D MRI
Day 0 and Day 40
Changes in cortical thickness
Time Frame: Day 0 and Day 40
Changes in cortical thickness measured with 3D MRI
Day 0 and Day 40
Brain activity and biochemical changes
Time Frame: Day 0 and Day 40
Changes measured with Resting state functional MRI and spectroscopy MRI
Day 0 and Day 40

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 30, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Major Depressive Disorder

Clinical Trials on Active rTMS

Subscribe