The Impact of Diaphragm Training on Dysphagia in Bulbar Palsy After Ischemic Stroke

April 27, 2024 updated by: Copka Sonpashan

The Impact of Diaphragm Training on Dysphagia in Bulbar Palsy After Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study

This was a prospective multicenter study. the patients after stroke with were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group. All patients were given comprehensive rehabilitation therapy. During the treatment, enteral nutrition support was provided for the two groups by Intermittent Oro-esophageal tube feeding. The observation group will be given Diaphragm Training Nutritional status, dysphagia, quality of life and depression before and after treatment were compared.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Dysphagia in patients after stroke continues to be a challenge. This was a prospective multicenter study. the patients after stroke with were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group. All patients were given comprehensive rehabilitation therapy. During the treatment, enteral nutrition support was provided for the two groups by Intermittent Oro-esophageal tube feeding. The observation group will be given Diaphragm Training Nutritional status, dysphagia, quality of life and depression before and after treatment were compared.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age ≥ 18 years;
  • meeting the diagnostic criteria of Bulbar Palsy After Ischemic Stroke;
  • any degree of dysphagia at admission;
  • steady vital signs, without severe cognitive impairment or sensory aphasia, able to cooperate with the assessment.
  • clear mind.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • complicated with other neurological diseases;
  • damaged mucosa or incomplete structure in nasopharynx;
  • tracheostomy tube plugged;
  • unfeasible to the support of parenteral nutrition;
  • simultaneously suffering from liver, kidney failure, tumors, or hematological diseases.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Routine rehabilitation+Diaphragm Training
Study lasts 15 days for each patient. The patients were given comprehensive rehabilitation therapy. The observation group was provided the support of enteral nutrition by Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding. Diaphragm Training will be given twice a day and 30min per time.
Before each feeding, inside and outside of the tube was cleaned with water. During feeding, the patient should maintain a semi-reclining or sitting position with mouth opened, and the tube was inserted slowly and smoothly into the upper part of the esophagus by medical staffs while the appropriate depth of intubation was checked with the calibration markings on the tube wall. The distance from the incisors to the head part of the tube should be between 22-25 cm. However, the specific depth should be evaluated based on patients' feedback and adjusted accordingly. After insertion, the tail part of the tube should be put into a container full of water and the absence of continuous bubbles indicated a successful intubation. Then, the feeding was to be conducted three times per day with 50 ml per minute and 400-600ml for each feeding.
Diaphragm training includes both active and passive methods. Passive training involves placing weights on the participant's abdomen to provide resistance during breathing. Active training involves instructing participants to practice diaphragmatic breathing techniques.

Including: Basic treatment, including corresponding control of risk factors and education on healthy lifestyles.

Swallowing training, including lemon ice stimulation, mendelson maneuver, empty swallowing training, and pronunciation training.

Pulmonary function training, including standing training, cough training, and diaphragm muscle training.

Active Comparator: Routine rehabilitation
Study lasts 15 days for each patient. The patients were given comprehensive rehabilitation therapy. The observation group was provided the support of enteral nutrition by Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding.
Before each feeding, inside and outside of the tube was cleaned with water. During feeding, the patient should maintain a semi-reclining or sitting position with mouth opened, and the tube was inserted slowly and smoothly into the upper part of the esophagus by medical staffs while the appropriate depth of intubation was checked with the calibration markings on the tube wall. The distance from the incisors to the head part of the tube should be between 22-25 cm. However, the specific depth should be evaluated based on patients' feedback and adjusted accordingly. After insertion, the tail part of the tube should be put into a container full of water and the absence of continuous bubbles indicated a successful intubation. Then, the feeding was to be conducted three times per day with 50 ml per minute and 400-600ml for each feeding.

Including: Basic treatment, including corresponding control of risk factors and education on healthy lifestyles.

Swallowing training, including lemon ice stimulation, mendelson maneuver, empty swallowing training, and pronunciation training.

Pulmonary function training, including standing training, cough training, and diaphragm muscle training.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Penetration-Aspiration Scale
Time Frame: Day 1 and day 15
The Penetration-Aspiration Scale was conducted under video fluoroscopic swallowing study. The scale is a standardized tool used to assess the safety of swallowing. The scale was developed to evaluate the entry of material into the airway (penetration) and the subsequent passage of material below the vocal folds (aspiration) during swallowing. The scale ranges from 1 to 8, with each level representing different degrees of penetration or aspiration.
Day 1 and day 15

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional Oral Intake Scale
Time Frame: Day 1 and day 15
The scale reflects the patient's oral intake. Studies have shown that this scale can also serve as an independent measure of intake for post-stroke dysphagia patients. The scale is divided into 7 levels, with the level positively correlated with swallowing function. Level 7 indicates normal swallowing function.
Day 1 and day 15
Dysphagia Handicap Index
Time Frame: Day 1 and day 15
Dysphagia Handicap Index is a self-reported questionnaire used to assess the impact of dysphagia on an individual's quality of life. It typically consists of multiple questions related to the physical, functional, and emotional aspects of swallowing difficulties. The total score range varies between 0 and 100. A higher score indicates a greater perceived impact of dysphagia on the individual's quality of life.
Day 1 and day 15

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 27, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bulbar Palsy

Clinical Trials on Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding

Subscribe