Improvement of PPROM Management With Prophylactic Antimicrobial Therapy (iPROMPT)

January 23, 2026 updated by: Kartik K Venkatesh, Ohio State University

Improvement of PPROM Management With Prophylactic Antimicrobial Therapy

To conduct an unblinded pragmatic randomized controlled trial (pRCT) "Improvement of PPROM Management with Prophylactic Antimicrobial Therapy (iPROMPT)" of a seven-day course of ceftriaxone, clarithromycin, and metronidazole versus the current standard of care of a seven-day course of ampicillin/amoxicillin and azithromycin or erythromycin to prolong pregnancy and decrease adverse perinatal outcomes among hospitalized pregnant individuals undergoing expectant management of PPROM <34 weeks.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) is the most common identifiable risk factor associated with preterm birth and affects 1 in 3 pregnant individuals in the United States with spontaneous preterm birth. Individuals diagnosed with PPROM who meet criteria for expectant management are currently admitted to the hospital for observation until delivery, which is generally recommended at 34 weeks' gestation unless indicated sooner. Initially upon admission, a course of prophylactic antibiotics is administered as this has been shown to prolong pregnancy and improve neonatal outcomes. The standard antibiotic regimen, primarily based on data published in 1997, includes ampicillin followed by amoxicillin with erythromycin or azithromycin for a total of 7 days. Ongoing studies are needed to determine the optimal prophylactic antibiotic regimen given changes in bacterial sensitivities over time, lack of adequate coverage for common organisms including genital mycoplasma, inadequate placental transfer of currently used antibiotic agents, ineffective antibiotic response at reducing the fetal inflammatory response, and new promising antibiotic agents that address these limitations. A promising expanded-spectrum alternative regimen with proof-of-concept is ceftriaxone, clarithromycin, and metronidazole. Observational studies have shown successful eradication of intraamniotic inflammation/infection using this new regimen. This regimen offers multiple potential advantages, including: higher bioavailability, higher transplacental transfer, and effectiveness against genital mycoplasma (clarithromycin), greater anaerobic coverage (metronidazole), and a longer half-life and expanded coverage against gram-negative bacteria (ceftriaxone) compared with the current standard regimen.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

56

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Recruiting
        • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center OB/GYN Maternal and Fetal Medicine
        • Contact:
    • Texas
      • Galveston, Texas, United States, 775555
        • Recruiting
        • University of Texas Medical Branch
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria

  • Admitted to the inpatient unit for expectant management of PPROM until delivery
  • Age ≥ 18 years with the ability to provide informed consent
  • Gestational age between 23 0/7 and 32 6/7 weeks

Exclusion criteria

  • Having received more than one dose of any prophylactic antibiotic
  • Suspected or confirmed infection requiring treatment with antibiotics
  • Allergy or contraindication to an antibiotic in either arm
  • Maternal immunosuppression

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group

Participants randomized to the intervention group will receive the following regimen:

  • Ceftriaxone 1 g IV q 24 hours x 7 days
  • Clarithromycin 500 mg PO BID x 7 days
  • Metronidazole 500 mg PO q 12 hours x 7 days
Ceftriaxone 1 g IV q 24 hours x 7 days (in addition to clarithromycin and metronidazole)
Clarithromycin 500 mg PO BID x 7 days (in addition to ceftriaxone and metronidazole)
Metronidazole 500 mg PO q 12 hours x 7 days (in addition to clarithromycin and ceftriaxone)
Other: Standard of care

Participants randomized to the standard care group will receive the following regimen:

  • Ampicillin 2 g IV q 6 hours x 48 hours followed by amoxicillin 250 mg q 8 hours for an additional 5 days
  • Azithromycin 1 g PO x 1 dose OR erythromycin 250 mg IV q 6 hours x 48 hours followed by erythromycin 333 mg PO TID for an additional 5 days
Ampicillin 2 g IV q 6 hours x 48 hours (prior to amoxicillin and in addition to either azithromycin or erythromycin)
Amoxicillin 250 mg q 8 hours for an additional 5 days (following ampicillin and in addition to either azithromycin or erythromycin)
Azithromycin 1 g PO x 1 dose (in addition to ampicillin and amoxicillin)
Erythromycin 250 mg IV q 6 hours x 48 hours followed by erythromycin 333 mg PO TID for an additional 5 days (in addition to ampicillin and amoxicillin)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Latency
Time Frame: From randomization to delivery
Latency will be measured in hours, and also reported as days for clinical interpretability.
From randomization to delivery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neonatal outcome composite checklist
Time Frame: From birth to up to 6 weeks postpartum
Includes neonatal sepsis, respiratory distress syndrome, any mechanical ventilation, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, necrotizing enterocolitis, stillbirth, or neonatal death
From birth to up to 6 weeks postpartum
Endometritis
Time Frame: From birth to up to 6 weeks postpartum
Diagnosed If the patient develops two of the following 1) oral body temperature ≥101°F at any time, or a temperature of ≥100.4 °F 24 hours after delivery, 2) maternal tachycardia that parallels the temperature, 3) uterine tenderness, 4) purulent vaginal discharge, or 5) associated findings with advanced endometritis (dynamic ileus, pelvic peritonitis, pelvic abscess, bowel obstruction, necrosis of the lower uterine segment)
From birth to up to 6 weeks postpartum
Surgical site infection
Time Frame: From birth to up to 6 weeks postpartum
Presence of either superficial or deep incisional SSI described as cellulitis/erythema and induration around the incision or purulent discharge from the incision site, with or without fever, such as necrotizing fasciitis (diagnosed based on necrotizing wound infection). Intraabdominal abscess may or may not be present. Wound hematoma, seroma, or incisional breakdown alone in the absence of the above signs does not constitute infection.
From birth to up to 6 weeks postpartum
Individual clinical infections
Time Frame: From birth to up to 6 weeks postpartum
From birth to up to 6 weeks postpartum
Puerperal fever
Time Frame: From birth to up to 6 weeks postpartum
temperature ≥ 100.4 °F at least twice 30 minutes apart, or once with the use of antipyretic, or ≥ 101 °F once. This will be analyzed for intrapartum and postpartum fever.
From birth to up to 6 weeks postpartum
Histopathologic chorioamnionitis/funisitis on histologic placental evaluation
Time Frame: From randomization to delivery
From randomization to delivery
Antibiotic receipt postpartum
Time Frame: From birth to up to 6 weeks postpartum
From birth to up to 6 weeks postpartum
Adverse events
Time Frame: From randomization to delivery
Allergic reactions (anaphylaxis, angioedema, urticaria), Stevens Johnsons syndrome, gastrointestinal side effects (nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, ileus)
From randomization to delivery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kartik K Venkatesh, MD, PhD, Ohio State University
  • Principal Investigator: Marissa Berry, MD, Ohio State University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 18, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 25, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 2, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Preterm Birth

Clinical Trials on Ceftriaxone 1000 MG

Subscribe