Deployment and Clinical Evaluation of an AI-powered Digital Oncology Biomarker Tool to guidE Treatment in TNBC (AIDOBE)

TILs have been shown to be predictive for response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with TNBC in multiple studies (Level-1B evidence for clinical validity as per REMARK criteria). TNBC patients with excellent survival outcome and low incidence of metastasis can be identified using a manual TIL score.

Furthermore, a fully end-to-end blinded evaluation of the same algorithm to be used in this study achieved >90% accuracy for predicting disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the pooled analysis of seven adjuvant phase-III TNBC trials.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with triple negative breast cancer requiring neoadjuvant systemic therapy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Confirmed diagnosis of triple negative breast cancer (non-metastatic)
  • Planned for neo-adjuvant systemic therapy
  • Written consent to generic Tissue for Research donation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients declined consent for generic Tissue for Research donation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To determine the reliability and performance of the process and AI tool
Time Frame: 6 months
Success rate of digitization of H&E slides & Turnaround time for biomarker report within standard patient pathways
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Navita Somaiah, Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 2, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on AI-analysis on diagnostic and surgical specimens

Subscribe