Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Different Procedures on Palatinal Wound Healing After Free Gingival Graft Surgery.

March 2, 2026 updated by: SEVAL CEYLAN ŞEN

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin (I-TZF) Impregnated Gelatin Sponge and 0.8% Hyaluronic Acid Gel Impregnated Gelatin Sponge on Clinical Healing of Palatinal Wound Healing After Free Gingival Grafting.

This study aimed to help determine the appropriate method to accelerate wound healing at the free gingival graft donor site and to minimize the patient's postoperative complaints. For this purpose, gelatin sponge impregnated with injectable platelet-rich fibrin (I-PRF), gelatin sponge impregnated with 0.8% polyvinylpyrrolidone sodium hyaluronate (HA) gel, and standard gelatin sponge application were compared to the secondary wound site on the palate.

The main questions aimed at being answered are:

  • Does the use of I-PRF or HA accelerate wound healing in patients?
  • Does the use of I-PRF or HA reduce pain and burning symptoms?
  • For this purpose, gelatin sponge impregnated with injectable platelet-rich fibrin (I-PRF), gelatin sponge impregnated with 0.8% polyvinylpyrrolidone sodium hyaluronate (HA) gel, and standard gelatin sponge application were compared to the secondary wound site on the palate.

Participants will:

  • They will record whether there is pain and burning for 7 days after the operation.
  • They will record if there is bleeding in the palate area.
  • They will write the number of painkillers they use daily.
  • They will visit the clinic on the 3rd, 5th, 7th, 14th, 21st, 28th days and 1st and 3rd months after the operation.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

67

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ankara
      • Ankara, Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye), (533) 316-1232
        • Health Sciences University Gulhane Faculty of Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inclusion criteria for the study were;
  • patients older than 18 and
  • systemically healthy patients,
  • who didn't use drugs that affect wound healing,
  • didn't have coagulation disorder and nausea, and
  • were not anti-inflammatory drug allergy sufferers.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria for the study were;
  • patients who had systematic disorders (such as diabetes, hypertension, radiotherapy, chemotherapy),
  • patients who were former or active smokers and alcohol users,
  • pregnant and breastfeeding, lactation, menstruation,
  • patients with poor oral hygiene, and patients who didn't attend regular check-ups.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Control
Only sterile gelatin sponge was sutured with 4/0 silk suture (4/0 Sterisilk, SSM Medical Equipment, Turkey) in the palatal region where FGG was taken and bleeding was controlled with SX bioplast plate.
Sterile gelatin sponge was sutured with 4/0 silk suture (4/0 Sterisilk, SSM Medical Equipment, Turkey) in the palatal region where FGG was taken and bleeding was controlled with SX bioplast plate.
Experimental: I-PRF
]. In the first test group, based on the g force, peripheral blood was collected in sterile plain plastic tubes (Beliver Industrial Estate, Pylmouth, UK.) and centrifuged to obtain I-PRF [16]. Injectable platelet-rich fibrin was produced using a protocol of 2500 RPM for 3 min (RCF-max = 509.53 g) I-PRF were produced with 11-mL plastic tubes (16*10 mm) using a Nuve NF 200 centrifugation device with a rotor angulation with a radius of 101 mm at the clot (Nuve NF 200, Nuve Industrial Materials Manufacturing and Trade Company, Ankara, Türkiye). The I-PRF at the top of the tube was collected with a syringe and transferred to the metal bowl. It was held for 20-25 min for polymerization. In the I-PRF test group, I-PRF was impregnated on a sterile gelatin sponge and sutured with 4/0 silk suture (4/0 Sterisilk, SSM Medical Equipment, Türkiye) on the palate area and bleeding was controlled with SX bioplast plate.
I-PRF were produced with 11-mL plastic tubes (16*10 mm) using a Nuve NF 200 centrifugation device with a rotor angulation with a radius of 101 mm at the clot (Nuve NF 200, Nuve Industrial Materials Manufacturing and Trade Company, Ankara, Türkiye). The I-PRF at the top of the tube was collected with a syringe and transferred to the metal bowl. It was held for 20-25 min for polymerization.
Experimental: Gengigel (HA)
0.8% polyvinylpyrrolidone sodium hyaluronate (HA) (Gengigel Prof, Ricerfarma SRL.) gel was impregnated on a sterile gelatin sponge and sutured with 4/0 silk suture (4/0 Sterisilk, SSM Medical Equipment, Türkiye) on the palate area and bleeding control was provided with SX bioplast plate.
0.8% polyvinylpyrrolidone sodium hyaluronate (HA) (Gengigel Prof, Ricerfarma SRL.) gel was impregnated on a sterile gelatin sponge and sutured with 4/0 silk suture (4/0 Sterisilk, SSM Medical Equipment, Türkiye) on the palate area and bleeding control was provided with SX bioplast plate.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Landry Wound Healing Index (WHI)
Time Frame: 1st, 3rd, 7th, 14th, 21st, 28th days and 1st and 3rd month after the surgical procedure

The primary result expected from the study is that the healing of the palatinal region left for secondary healing is faster in the I-PRF and 0.8% HA groups compared to the control group.

The primary outcome of the study was to measure the palatal wound healing status using the Landry Wound Healing Index (WHI) (Landry RG (1985) Efectiveness of benzydamine HC1 in the treatment of periodontal post-surgical patients. Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto), which grades the wound healing on a scale of the 3rd, 7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th days postoperatively. This index, which has a score range of 1 (very poor) to 5 (excellent), evaluates tissue color, response to palpation, granulation tissue presence, incision margins' epithelialization, and amount of suppuration.

1st, 3rd, 7th, 14th, 21st, 28th days and 1st and 3rd month after the surgical procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain and burn (Visual Analog Scale)
Time Frame: First 7 day after the surgical procedure

The secondary result expected from the study is that postoperative pain and burning are less in the I-PRF and 0.8% HA groups compared to the control group.

The secondary outcomes of the study were to measure patients' perception of pain, discomfort while chewing, and burning sensation after FGG harvesting using a numerical rating scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain, no discomfort while chewing, no burning sense) to 10 (the worst pain imaginable, extreme discomfort while chewing, extreme burning sense) between days 1 and 7, and the amount of analgesic consumption between days 1 and 7 postoperatively.

First 7 day after the surgical procedure
Tissue color match (CM)
Time Frame: 1st, 3rd, 7th, 14th, 21st, 28th days and 1st and 3rd month after the surgical procedure
Tissue color match (CM) was assessed with adjacent and contralateral palatal tissue (0-no color matching to 10-excellent color matching)
1st, 3rd, 7th, 14th, 21st, 28th days and 1st and 3rd month after the surgical procedure
postoperative bleeding
Time Frame: 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 7th day after the surgical procedure.
The patients were asked to keep a record of whether there was any bleeding in the palatal region, and at the same time, the presence of postoperative bleeding, also known as delayed bleeding (DB), was recorded as present (+) or absent (-) on the days when the patients came to the follow up appointments.
1st, 3rd, 5th, and 7th day after the surgical procedure.
H2O2 bubbling
Time Frame: 1st, 3rd, 7th, 14th, 21st, 28th days after the surgical procedure
The epithelialization of the palatal region was recorded according to the application of 3% hydrogen peroxide to the region and whether there was foaming or not, and was calculated as a percentage (H2O2 bubbling). Complete epithelization (CE) was also evaluated clinically by monitoring the surface characteristics and clarity of the wound contour and recorded as "yes" or "no".
1st, 3rd, 7th, 14th, 21st, 28th days after the surgical procedure
Oral Health Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL)
Time Frame: 7th and 14th days after the surgical procedure.
Oral Health Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) was administered on the 7th and 14th days after the surgical procedures to analyse how the person's daily physical-social life and mental health status were affected. This scale developed by McGrath and Bedi evaluates the effects of oral health on quality of life in both positive and negative domains. The scale includes 16 questions consisting of 4 different categories. The categories consist of current symptoms (2 questions) and physical (5 questions), psychological (5 questions) and social (4 questions) conditions. The questions in the OHRQOL-TR questionnaire are scored on a Likert scale with values between 1 and 5 (such as 'very bad' (score 1), 'bad' (score 2), 'none' (score 3), 'good' (score 4) or 'very good' (score 5)). When the scores of 16 questions are totalled, there is a value in the range of 16-80. The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the scale was proved and reported in the study conducted by Mumcu et al.
7th and 14th days after the surgical procedure.
Number of analgesics taken
Time Frame: First 7 day after the surgical procedure.
Patients were informed that the number of analgesics theytook for post-operative pain relief was recorded for 7 days
First 7 day after the surgical procedure.
palatal soft-tissue thickness (PSTT)
Time Frame: Initial, 1st and 3rd month after the surgical procedure
The PSTT in the harvested area was measured after theadministration of local anaesthesia.The measurement was made approximately 5 mm apical to the gingival marginof the first premolar using a #15 endodontic reamer. Thepenetration depth was measured using a digital caliper. Themeasurements were obtained before harvesting the FGG and at 1 and 3 months after the operation.The graft thickness was measured in the same way at the middle points of all four edges of the graft. The mean of theobtained values was calculated and considered to be the graft thickness. The dimensions of the graft were standardized using a sterile aluminium foil template of 7 * 12 mm.
Initial, 1st and 3rd month after the surgical procedure
tissue consistency
Time Frame: On the 3rd, 7th, 14th and 21st days after surgery
After the operation, the consistency of the donor area in the palatal region was marked to be soft and firm.
On the 3rd, 7th, 14th and 21st days after surgery
Palate sensitivity
Time Frame: On the 7th, 14th and 21st days after surgery
Palate sensitivity was measured by using a numerical rating scale (VAS) from 0 (no sensitivity) to 10 (most sensitivity) on the 7th, 14th and 21st days after surgery
On the 7th, 14th and 21st days after surgery
Loss of sensation
Time Frame: n the 3rd, 7th, 14th, 21st, 28th day, 1st month, and 3rd month after the operation
Loss of sensation was recorded as none (0), moderate (1), and severe (2) on the 3rd, 7th, 14th, 21st, 28th day, 1st month, and 3rd month after the operation.
n the 3rd, 7th, 14th, 21st, 28th day, 1st month, and 3rd month after the operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: SEVAL CEYLAN ŞEN, Assist Prof., Gülhane Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 15, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 4, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Insufficient Keratinized Gingiva

Clinical Trials on Injectable platelet-rich fibrin (I-PRF)

Subscribe