Controlled Active Motion vs Early Passive Mobilization for Flexor Tendons Repair

June 4, 2024 updated by: Hisham Mohamed Hussein, University of Hail

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Controlled Active Motion and Early Passive Mobilization Protocols for Rehabilitation of Repaired Flexor Tendons in Zone II

a randomized controlled trial tends to compare 2 rehabilitation approaches - early passive mobilization (EPM) and controlled active motion (CAM) - that are commonly used in the treatment of post-surgical flexor tendon repair of the hand

Study Overview

Detailed Description

a randomized controlled trial tends to compare 2 rehabilitation approaches commonly used in the treatment of post-surgical flexor tendon repair of the hand. in this study, the authors try to fill the gap in the literature regarding the more effective approach. the comparisons between both approaches were scarce in previous literature.

Participants will be randomly allocated to one of two treatment groups: early passive mobilization (EPM) using a modified Kleinert protocol or controlled active motion (CAM) using a modified Duran technique (n=20). Patients were assessed at baseline and then at the 6th and 12th weeks of interventions to quantify total active motion (TAM) of the proximal and distal interphalangeal joints using goniometry, and grip strength with dynamometry. the disability level will be assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hail, Saudi Arabia, 3994
        • Recruiting
        • Hisham Hussein
        • Contact:
      • Hail, Saudi Arabia, 2442
        • Recruiting
        • Hail University Poly Clinic
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • males or females
  • between 25-50 years
  • Post-surgical repair of the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) and superficialis (FDS) tendons of a single-digit
  • the case should be recent (2-3 days post-surgical)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age below 25 or above 50
  • a systemic disease affecting hand joints such as rheumatic arthritis
  • thumb flexor tendon repair will be excluded
  • chronic cases
  • concurrent injuries such as phalangeal fractures, joint injuries, or significant skin loss

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Early passive mobilization group
The modified Kleinert protocol will be used as an EPM procedure. Within 3 to 5 days following surgery, the affected hand will be placed inside the dorsal slab Kleinert splint with the wrist in 30-40 flexion; metacarpophalangeal joint (MP) in 60-70-degree flexion; PIP and DIP joints in extension. Rubber band traction will be directed to the fingernail from the wrist, with a palmar pulley system. All patients will perform passive flexion and active extension exercises with an active hold for 2-3 seconds 10 times per hour. Traction will be removed at the end of 3rd week and very gentle active flexion will start at the 4th week. The splint will be removed in the 5th-6th weeks. Blocking exercises will be started at 7th-8th weeks and resisted exercises will be started after the 8th week with the full function permitted by week 12th week .
a rehabilitation protocol for post-surgical repair of flexor tendons of the hand
Other Names:
  • modified Kleinert protocol
Experimental: Controlled active motion group
A modified CAM protocol will be used. Exercises will be performed hourly for 10 repetitions in the form of passive flexion and active extension exercises with an active hold of the fingers in the flexed position for 2-3 seconds.
a rehabilitation protocol for post-surgical repair of flexor tendons of the hand

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total active motion (TAM)
Time Frame: at baseline
Active range of motion in proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) and the distal interphalangeal joint (DIP) of the injured digits will be measured by manual hand goniometry. Outcome will be expressed by Strickland formula. TAM (%) = (Active flexion of PIP+DIP) - Extension Lag of both joints/175× 100 This formula can determine the percentage of recovery of TAM. The results of TAM (%) are classified in four categories: "Excellent, good, fair, and poor"
at baseline
Total active motion (TAM)
Time Frame: after the 12th week of intervention
This formula can determine the percentage of recovery of TAM. The results of TAM (%) are classified in four categories: "Excellent, good, fair, and poor" This formula determined the percentage of recovery of TAM. The results of TAM (%) were classified in four categories: "Excellent, good, fair, and poor"
after the 12th week of intervention
handgrip strength
Time Frame: baseline

Hand dynamometer (Jammer dynamometer) will be used to evaluate hand grip strength. Measurements will be taken for both hands for three times. The mean of three trials will be taken for every measurement occasion. The mean value in the injured hand will be expressed as percentage of the mean value in the non-injured hand as follows:

% of hand grip strength = Mean grip strength in the involved hand/ Mean grip strength in the uninvolved hand × 100.

baseline
handgrip strength
Time Frame: after the 12th week of intervention

Hand dynamometer (Jammer dynamometer) will be used to evaluate hand grip strength. Measurements will be taken for both hands for three times. The mean of three trials will be taken for every measurement occasion. The mean value in the injured hand will be expressed as percentage of the mean value in the non-injured hand as follows:

% of hand grip strength = Mean grip strength in the involved hand/ Mean grip strength in the uninvolved hand × 100.

after the 12th week of intervention
Functional disability
Time Frame: at baseline
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire will be used to measure the functional disabilities. It is a valid questionnaire used in a number of other disabling conditions of the hand. A DASH-questionnaire score, ranges from 0 to 100. A score of 0 means no difficulties in daily living and a score of 100 means maximum difficulties in performing tasks of daily living
at baseline
Functional disability
Time Frame: after the 12th week of intervention
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire will be used to measure the functional disabilities. It is a valid questionnaire used in a number of other disabling conditions of the hand. A DASH-questionnaire score, ranges from 0 to 100. A score of 0 means no difficulties in daily living and a score of 100 means maximum difficulties in performing tasks of daily living
after the 12th week of intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 4, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 20, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • H-2024- 366

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

data will be available with the senior author upon request

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Flexor Tendon Rupture

Clinical Trials on Early passive mobilization

Subscribe