A Bowel Management Program (Retrograde Rectal Enema) for the Treatment of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Rectal Cancer Patients

April 16, 2026 updated by: Alessandra, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Retrograde Enema Program vs Medical Management

This clinical trial studies if a bowel management program with a retrograde rectal enema (RRE) for the treatment of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) in rectal cancer patients is better than medical management alone. Rectal cancer treatment can include a procedure where part of the rectum with cancer is removed and the remaining part of the rectum is reconnected to the colon, this is called a low anterior resection of the rectum. LARS is a common condition that can develop after undergoing a low anterior resection of the rectum. LARS consists of any change in how the body performs defecation, the discharge of feces from the body, after undergoing a resection procedure. Patients with LARS may experience fecal urgency, incontinence, increased frequency, constipation, feelings of incomplete bowel movement, or bowel emptying difficulties. Patients may experience individual symptoms of LARS or a combination of them. A bowel management program assists patient's with identifying a specific bowel management regimen that works best for managing symptoms of LARS. A RRE consists of inserting a catheter through the anus into the rectum. The RRE is designed to assist fecal emptying. Medical management of LARS can include the use of fiber, loperamide hydrochloride, or pelvic floor physical therapy. Fiber may help relieve constipation, feelings of incomplete bowel movement, or bowel emptying difficulties. Loperamide hydrocholoride may help lessen fecal urgency, incontinence, or increased frequency. Pelvic floor physical therapy may help restore strength in the rectum possibly helping to improve symptoms of LARS. Participating in a bowel management program with a RRE may be more effective in treating LARS than medical management alone.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To compare two approved pathways for treatment of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) - a retrograde enema program versus a medical management pathway.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVE:

I. The determination of feasibility to complete this treatment pathway.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 groups.

GROUP I: Patients undergo a bowel management program comprising a medical management pathway (fiber, loperamide hydrochloride, pelvic floor physical therapy) in combination with RRE treatment for 1 year. Patients use the RRE system to self administer an individualized enema regimen via the rectum. Patients may undergo abdominal film x-rays throughout the trial.

GROUP II: Patients receive medical management comprising fiber, loperamide hydrochloride, and pelvic floor therapy for 1 year. If medical management fails, patients may then be referred for surgery with sacral nerve stimulator placement.

Upon completion of study intervention all patients are followed up at 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Recruiting
        • Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Alessandra C. Gasior, DO

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Moderate to Severe LARS diagnosis
  • Patients with history of rectal cancer that was treated with proctectomy
  • Has undergone standard medical management without improvement of symptoms for 3-6 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients presenting with significant stricture that need a definitive surgical management strategy; patients with minor or clinically negligible strictures can still be candidates. Patients who are able to pass the catheter and the balloon per rectum may be candidates after a digital rectal exam at their initial visit
  • Patients with any chemo or radiation therapy in the last 6 months
  • Patients who currently have colorectal cancer
  • Patients with recurrent colorectal cancer
  • Patients who have undergone a colorectal surgical procedure within the last three months
  • Patients with progressive neurological disease
  • Patients with active or recurrent sacral infection
  • Patients < 18 years old
  • Active sacral nerve simulator
  • Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the treatment portion of the study
  • Altered mental status or mental disability that would alter ability to self-administer enema
  • Any reason the research team believes the subject is not an appropriate candidate for this study (i.e., transportation issues, history of no-show appointments, lack of reliable communications, vulnerable population(s), etc.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group II (medical management)
Patients receive medical management comprising fiber, loperamide hydrochloride, and pelvic floor therapy for 1 year. If medical management fails, patients may then be referred for surgery with sacral nerve stimulator placement.
Ancillary studies
Receive dietary fiber
Other Names:
  • Fiber
Receive loperamide hydrochloride
Other Names:
  • Imodium
  • Imodium A-D
Undergo pelvic floor physical therapy
Other Names:
  • Physiatric Procedure
  • Physical Medicine Procedure
  • Physical Therapeutics
  • Physical Therapy Procedure
  • Physiotherapy
  • Physiotherapy Procedure
Experimental: Group I (RRE, medical management)
Patients undergo a bowel management program comprising a medical management pathway (fiber, loperamide hydrochloride, pelvic floor physical therapy) in combination with RRE treatment for 1 year. Patients use the RRE system to self administer an individualized enema regimen via the rectum. Patients may undergo abdominal film x-rays throughout the trial.
Ancillary studies
Receive dietary fiber
Other Names:
  • Fiber
Undergo RRE
Other Names:
  • Enema
  • Enema Injection
Receive loperamide hydrochloride
Other Names:
  • Imodium
  • Imodium A-D
Undergo pelvic floor physical therapy
Other Names:
  • Physiatric Procedure
  • Physical Medicine Procedure
  • Physical Therapeutics
  • Physical Therapy Procedure
  • Physiotherapy
  • Physiotherapy Procedure
Undergo abdominal film x-ray
Other Names:
  • Conventional X-Ray
  • Diagnostic Radiology
  • Medical Imaging, X-Ray
  • Radiographic Imaging
  • Radiography
  • Static X-Ray
  • X-Ray
  • Plain film radiographs
  • Radiographic imaging procedure (procedure)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fecal incontinence
Time Frame: Up to 1 year from start of treatment
Will be measured using a validated scoring tool for LARS (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Bowel Function Instrument Questionnaire [MSKCC BFI]). Effect size (Cohen's d > 0.80) will be computed to ensure the effect of findings. P < 0.05 is considered significant. Statistical analysis will be conducted using linear or nonlinear mixed modelling as found appropriate by the statistician.
Up to 1 year from start of treatment
Effectiveness assessed using LARS validated scoring tool
Time Frame: Up to 1 year from start of treatment
Will be assessed using LARS validated scoring tool. Effect size (Cohen's d > 0.80) will be computed to ensure the effect of findings. P < 0.05 is considered significant. Statistical analysis will be conducted using linear or nonlinear mixed modelling as found appropriate by the statistician.
Up to 1 year from start of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility measured by Patient Satisfaction Survey
Time Frame: At 1 year from start of treatment
Will be assessed by administering a patient satisfaction survey post treatment. Effect size (Cohen's d > 0.80) will be computed to ensure the effect of findings. P < 0.05 is considered significant. Statistical analysis will be conducted using linear or nonlinear mixed modelling as found appropriate by the statistician.
At 1 year from start of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alessandra C Gasior, DO, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 16, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 21, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Anterior Resection Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Questionnaire Administration

Subscribe