High-dose Opioid Versus Opioid-sparing Anaesthesia in Cardiac Surgery

July 27, 2024 updated by: Yan Fuxia, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital

Postoperative Recovery After Cardiac Surgery A Randomised Controlled Trial of High-dose Opioid Versus Opioid-sparing Anaesthesia

BACKGROUND In cardiac surgery, high-dose opioid contributes to adverse events associated with poor postoperative outcomes. There is growing evidence that nerve block-based multi-modal anesthesia protocols may reduce intraoperative opioid consumption without compromising analgesia management and consequently improve patient's early postoperative recovery.

OBJECTIVE To determine whether opioid-sparing anaesthesia based on ultrasound-guided nerve block could improve early postoperative recovery after cardiac surgery.

DESIGN A randomised controlled trial. SETTING A tertiary hospital. PATIENTS Eighty patients aged 45 to 70 years undergoing cardiac surgery were enrolled. Key exclusion criteria included contraindication to interventions or drugs and a history of chronic pain or chronic opioid use.

INTERVENTIONS Eligible patients were randomised at a 1:1 ratio to receive either opioid-sparing anaesthesia based on ultrasound-guided nerve block (intervention group) or opioid-based anaesthesia (control group).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the global score of the 15-item Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire at 24h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included QoR-15 at 72h after surgery, postoperative pain score, the incidence of postoperative adverse events and chronic pain. Other outcomes included endotracheal intubation duration, length of hospitalization, and hospital costs.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China
        • Fuwai Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Male or female adult patients aged 45 to 70 years, awaiting elective cardiac surgery, and American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classes II or III were eligible.

Exclusion Criteria:

contraindications to punctual or local anesthetic drugs, a history of chronic pain or chronic opioid use, and an inability to communicate or refuse to enroll.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: pecto-intercostal fascial block and rectus sheath block-based opioid-sparing anesthesia
Patients in the OSA group was administrated with 0.5 to 1 mcg·kg-1 sufentanil and received PIFB combined with RSB after anesthetic induction. Patients in the control group were recommended to receive 2 to 3 mcg·kg-1 opioid-based sufentanil. PIFB was conducted at the T2 to T5 levels under ultrasound guidance. Each side received 20 ml 0.3% ropivacaine containing 2.5 mg dexamethasone. Bilateral RSB was conducted after the PIFB and the needle was inserted into the plane between the rectus abdominal muscle and its posterior sheath using an in-plane approach. After verifying needle placement, 15 ml 0.3% ropivacaine containing 2.5 mg dexamethasone was delivered to each side. In the control group, patients received no procedure and were administrated with traditional anesthetic protocol. Patients received continuous intravenous sufentanil (50 to 100 mg) and tropisetron (5 to 10 mg) at 2 ml·h-1 for the first 48 hours after surgery.
No Intervention: high-dose opiod traditional anesthesia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
QoR-15 at 24h
Time Frame: at 24 hours after surgery
the global score of the 15-item Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire at 24h after surgery
at 24 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
QoR-15 at 72h
Time Frame: QoR-15 at 72 hours after surgery
the global score of the 15-item Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire at 72h after surgery
QoR-15 at 72 hours after surgery
Number rating score (NRS)
Time Frame: NRS at 24 hours and 72 hours after surgery
Postoperatvie pain was evaluated using a number rating score (NRS) (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain possible).
NRS at 24 hours and 72 hours after surgery
postoperative adverse events
Time Frame: during hospitalization, an average of 2 weeks, assessed up to 30 days
postoperative adverse events included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACCEs), moderate to severe acute kidney injury (AKI), moderate to severe acute liver injury, reintubation, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).
during hospitalization, an average of 2 weeks, assessed up to 30 days
chronic pain
Time Frame: at 3 months after surgery
persistent postoperative pain lasting beyond 3 months
at 3 months after surgery

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: The time from the end of operation to the removal of tracheal intubation, assessed up to 30 days
The time from the end of operation to the removal of tracheal intubation
The time from the end of operation to the removal of tracheal intubation, assessed up to 30 days
hospital length of stay (LOS)
Time Frame: From the date of admission until the date of discharging, assessed up to 30 days
From the date of admission until the date of discharging
From the date of admission until the date of discharging, assessed up to 30 days
hospital costs
Time Frame: during hospitalization, an average of 2 weeks, assessed up to 30 days
Total cost of patients during hospitalization
during hospitalization, an average of 2 weeks, assessed up to 30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 22, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 22, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 22, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 31, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 30, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 27, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Data availuable by sending email to corresponding authors

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Surgery Patients

Clinical Trials on opioid-sparing protocol

Subscribe