Benefit of Spectral Information in Patients Suspected for Lung Cancer

March 18, 2026 updated by: Michael Brun Andersen, Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev

Benefit of Spectral Information Provided by Photon Counting CT in Patients Suspected for Lung Cancer

Purpose The aim of the study is to investigate the utilization of photon counting CT (PCCT) and the spectral information provided to determine the impact of spectral information on follow-up examinations.

As secondary aims we will compare conventional CT, CT + 18Flouro-deoxy-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and PCCT + 18F-FDG PET for the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging of lung cancer patients.

PCCT with and without spectral information to assess the need for additional work-up,TNM classification, and sensitivity/specificity for malignant lesions. Patients will be randomized for reading with or without spectral information available within a clinical setting. The clinical readings are performed as a structured reports of all significant findings. Including both malignant and benign findings. Furthermore, in case additional follow-up/work-up is needed based on the guidelines on incidental findings by the American College of Radiology (ACR), this will be reported as well. If lesions suspicious of pulmonary malignancy is present, a provisional TNM classification is provided based on the scan findings.

After 3 months, the patient record is reviewed where additional examinations that can be attributed to the PCCT scan are recorded. The financial impact is calculated by a health economist based on the findings. PET/CT, conventional CT and PCCT combined with PET will be assessed retrospectively for comparison. Endpoints are number of supplementary examinations and cost savings. Sensitivity and specificity for any malignant finding. The T, N and M stages are assessed separately as diagnostic measures by the McNemar's test with a reference standard from the Danish Lung cancer register. The number of malignant lesions will be determined by reviewing the patient records incl. pathology assessment if available 12 months after inclusion of the last patient.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Capital Region
      • Herlev, Capital Region, Denmark, 2730

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients suspected of lung cancer refered to Copenhagen University Hospital as per the guidelines from the danish national health authorities from either the general practitioner or from the department of pulmonology.
  • Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who cannot tolerate intravenous iodinated contrast
  • Already verified lung cancer from another institution
  • Comorbidities that exclude the patient from receiving treatment
  • Lack of reference standard in the form of either histology or follow-up
  • Known extrapulmonary malignancy
  • Technical limitations within the scans/reconstructions
  • other

Pr. the 29th of September included 433 participants.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: CT images without spectral information available
Reported without access to spectral information in a normal clinical practice. Supplemental examinations suggested as per the ACR white papers for incidental findings.
Experimental: CT images with spectral information available
Reported with access to spectral information in a normal clinical practice. Supplemental examinations suggested as per the ACR white papers for incidental findings.
The reading radiologist will in the experimental arm have access to spectral CT images in the form of low virtual monoenergetic images, virtual non-contrast images, iodine maps and effective atomic number. In the non-interventional arms the reading radiologist will only have access to conventional CT images.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of follow up examinations
Time Frame: Baseline
Determine the number of suggested follow-up examinations based on the initial CT scan to learn the significance of spectral information in a clinical setting.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
T, N, and M stage
Time Frame: 24 months
Determine the accuracy of T, N, and M stage based on PCCT, conventional CT, PET/CT and PET/PCCT. Retrospective assessment 24 months after primary scan.
24 months
Number of malignant lesions
Time Frame: 24 months
Determine the number of found malignant lesions in each arm. Reference standard will be follow up or pathology within a minimum of one year of the scan. That means 12 months after the end of the inclusion period.
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael B Andersen, PhD, Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 24, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 27, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Neoplasm Malignant

Clinical Trials on Spectral CT images generated by a photon counting CT scanner

Subscribe