Low and High Flow Suctioning in Intubated Infants

April 7, 2026 updated by: Rakesh Sahni, Columbia University

Physiological Consequences of Low and High Flow Endotracheal Suctioning Devices in Intubated Preterm and Term Infants

Preterm and term intubuted infants in the NICU will undergo two sequential suctioning procedures: a new, FDA-approved suction device called EXSALTA (ED) and the standard conventional wall (SCW). The physiological consequences, i.e. changes in heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), cerebral oxygenation (C-rSO2), and cerebral fractional oxygen extraction (C-FOE) between ED and SCW ETT tracheal suctioning system in both open and closed catheter system settings will be evaluated using a randomized cross over design in preterm and term infants receiving mechanical ventilation via an ETT. This study will evaluate the hypothesis that there will be significantly lower variations in HR, SpO2, C-rSO2, and C-FOE during ETT suctioning with ED compared to SCW suctioning systems under both open and close ETT suction settings.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Respiratory failure in neonates frequently requires mechanical ventilation through an endotracheal tube (ETT). The presence of an ETT inhibits the infant's intrinsic ability to clear endogenous lung secretions effectively with compromised glottic closure and impaired muccociliary function, and thus regular supportive suctioning of the ETT is essential. The benefits of patent airway are evident, but adverse effects may also result from suctioning which are especially deleterious in extremely preterm infants with immature pulmonary and systemic hemodynamic function. These adverse effects include transient hypoxemia and oxygen desaturation, vasovagal reactions, altered central and cerebral hemodynamics, atelectasis, pneumothorax, and mucosal damage. The cardiorespiratory instability during ETT suctioning is partially attributed to alveolar decruitment and loss of lung volume from disconnecting the ETT from the ventilator circuit and negative suction pressure. Maintenance of lung volume is essential to optimize gas exchange and prevent ventilator induced lung injury. The magnitude of lung volume loss is related to catheter size and applied suctioning pressure and flow, highlighting the complexity of interaction between suction technique, lung mechanics and disease state. In accordance with industry standard codes, a high flow rate is essential to ensure the rapid removal of fluid and secretions from the desired site and the standard conventional wall (SCW) suction outlets provide a minimum flow of approximately 85 liters per minute. Such high flows can lead to endotracheal suctioning-induced alveolar decruitment that may of significant clinical relevance. Recently, a low flow technology suction device EXSALTA (ED) for clearing ETT secretions in patients on ventilators has been approved by FDA. The device uses peristaltic action to move fluids from the patient to a collection canister at a fixed flow rate of 1.4 L/min and eliminates the uncontrolled flow of air from the patient's lungs. The user selects a desired pressure level that is independent of the flow rate, a feature unavailable with SCW wall suction equipment used at patient's bedside. This exceptional microprocessor-controlled tabletop suction device, available at any suction setting, reduces risk of negative pressures in the lungs to help prevent alveolar collapse and hypoxia associated with standard suctioning techniques. This study will examine the hypothesis that there will be significantly lower variations in heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), cerebral oxygenation (C-rSO2), and cerebral fractional oxygen extraction (c-FOE) with ED compared to SCW suction system during open or closed ETT suctioning. To test this hypothesis, the physiological consequences of two ETT suctioning systems in preterm and term infants will be evaluated using the following aims:

AIM 1. To compare the variations in HR (bpm), SpO2 (%), C-rSO2 (%), C-FOE (%) between ED and SCW suctioning systems during routine standard care open and closed ETT suctioning.

AIM II. To compare the incidence (episodes) of cardiorespiratory disturbances, i.e. bradycardia (HR<80 bpm) and/or hemoglobin oxygen desaturation (SpO2) < 80% for more than 10s during suctioning with ED and SCW suctioning system during routine standard care open and closed ETT suctioning.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032-3720
        • Recruiting
        • Columbia University Irving Medical Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Preterm and term infants with birth weight more than 1000g receiving ETT suctioning

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants with cyanotic congenital heart disease and cardiac rhythm disorders (arrythmias) will be excluded from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Exsalta Device suctioning
Low flow endotracheal suction device
Active Comparator: Coventional wall suctioning
Low flow endotracheal suction device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in heart rate (HR)
Time Frame: Before suctioning (baseline) and up to 1-hour after suctioning
Measured as beats per minute
Before suctioning (baseline) and up to 1-hour after suctioning
Change in oxygen saturation (SpO2)
Time Frame: Before suctioning (baseline) and up to 1-hour after suctioning
Measured as percent (%) change
Before suctioning (baseline) and up to 1-hour after suctioning
Change in cerebral oxygenation (C-rSO2)
Time Frame: Before suctioning (baseline) and up to 1-hour after suctioning
Measured as percent (%) change
Before suctioning (baseline) and up to 1-hour after suctioning
Change in cerebral fractional oxygen extraction (c-FOE)
Time Frame: Before suctioning (baseline) and up to 1-hour after suctioning
Measured as difference in SpO2 and C-rSO2 (%)
Before suctioning (baseline) and up to 1-hour after suctioning

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of bradycardia
Time Frame: Before suctioning (baseline) and up to 1-hour after suctioning
Count (episodes) of HR<80% for more than 10 sec
Before suctioning (baseline) and up to 1-hour after suctioning
Incidence of hemoglobin oxygen desaturation
Time Frame: Before suctioning (baseline) and up to 1-hour after suctioning
Count (episodes) of SpO2<80% for more than 10 sec
Before suctioning (baseline) and up to 1-hour after suctioning

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rakesh Sahni, MD, Columbia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 4, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Failure

Clinical Trials on Exsalta Suction Device

Subscribe