A Multi-center, Prospective, Single-blind, Controlled Trial Comparing Diagnostic Value of Different EUS-FNA Techniques (EUS-FNA)

September 14, 2018 updated by: Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

A Multi-center, Prospective, Single-blind, Controlled Trial Comparing Suction Technique, Slow-pull Method and Wet Suction Technique on Specimen Quality and Diagnostic Accuracy in Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration

The aim of this study is to compare endoscopic ultrasound guided-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) with a standard 22-gauge needle using "standard suction", "slow-pull" and "wet suction" for thoracic/abdominal solid/solid-cystic lesions. Investigators intend to compare the effectiveness and safety of the three methods in order to discover the optimized technique for obtaining diagnostic material and making accurate diagnosis.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430060
        • Recruiting
        • Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
        • Contact:
          • Ning Cui, M.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jiwang Cao, M.D.
    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, China, 250012
        • Recruiting
        • Qilu Hospital, Shandong University
        • Contact:
          • Limei Wang, M.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ning Zhong, M.D.
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200032
        • Recruiting
        • Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University
        • Contact:
          • Tianyin Chen, M.D.
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Yiqun Zhang, M.D.
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200040
        • Recruiting
        • Huashan Hospital, Fudan University
        • Contact:
          • Sijie Hao, M.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Chen Jin, M.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • In-patients and out-patients between the age of 18years and 80 years with thoracic/abdominal solid/solid-cystic lesions for EUS-FNA.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncorrectable coagulopathy (INR > 1.5)
  • Uncorrectable thrombocytopenia (platelet < 50,000)
  • Cystic lesions
  • Inaccessible lesions to EUS
  • Contraindications for conscious sedation
  • Uncooperative patients
  • Refusal to consent form

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A
Patients assigned to group A will be sampled for a total of 3 consecutive FNA passes with a sequential method of "standard suction", "slow-pull", and "wet suction". After completing all the passes, the obtained specimen will be packed individually and sent to pathologists who are blind to the method sequence.
Patients will be sampled for a total of 3 consecutive FNA passes with a sequential method of "standard suction", "slow-pull", and "wet suction". After completing all the passes, the obtained specimen will be packed individually and sent to pathologists who are blind to the method sequence.
Experimental: Group B
Patients assigned to group B will be sampled for a total of 3 consecutive FNA passes with a sequential method of "standard suction", "wet suction", and "slow-pull". After completing all the passes, the obtained specimen will be packed individually and sent to pathologists who are blind to the method sequence.
Patients will be sampled for a total of 3 consecutive FNA passes with a sequential method of "standard suction", "wet suction", and "slow-pull". After completing all the passes, the obtained specimen will be packed individually and sent to pathologists who are blind to the method sequence.
Experimental: Group C
Patients assigned to group C will be sampled for a total of 3 consecutive FNA passes with a sequential method of "slow-pull", "standard suction", and "wet suction". After completing all the passes, the obtained specimen will be packed individually and sent to pathologists who are blind to the method sequence.
Patients will be sampled for a total of 3 consecutive FNA passes with a sequential method of "slow-pull", "standard suction", and "wet suction". After completing all the passes, the obtained specimen will be packed individually and sent to pathologists who are blind to the method sequence.
Experimental: Group D
Patients assigned to group D will be sampled for a total of 3 consecutive FNA passes with a sequential method of "slow-pull", "wet suction", and "standard suction". After completing all the passes, the obtained specimen will be packed individually and sent to pathologists who are blind to the method sequence.
Patients will be sampled for a total of 3 consecutive FNA passes with a sequential method of "slow-pull", "wet suction", and "standard suction". After completing all the passes, the obtained specimen will be packed individually and sent to pathologists who are blind to the method sequence.
Experimental: Group E
Patients assigned to group E will be sampled for a total of 3 consecutive FNA passes with a sequential method of "wet suction", "standard suction", and "slow-pull". After completing all the passes, the obtained specimen will be packed individually and sent to pathologists who are blind to the method sequence.
Patients will be sampled for a total of 3 consecutive FNA passes with a sequential method of "wet suction", "standard suction", and "slow-pull". After completing all the passes, the obtained specimen will be packed individually and sent to pathologists who are blind to the method sequence.
Experimental: Group F
Patients assigned to group F will be sampled for a total of 3 consecutive FNA passes with a sequential method of "wet suction", "slow-pull", and "standard suction". After completing all the passes, the obtained specimen will be packed individually and sent to pathologists who are blind to the method sequence.
Patients will be sampled for a total of 3 consecutive FNA passes with a sequential method of "wet suction", "slow-pull", and "standard suction". After completing all the passes, the obtained specimen will be packed individually and sent to pathologists who are blind to the method sequence.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic yield of standard suction technique
Time Frame: 1 year
A positive diagnosis of malignancy by an EUS biopsy specimen is accepted as a true positive. A benign diagnosis is confirmed by surgical tissue samples when available or clinical follow-up after 1 year.
1 year
Diagnostic yield of slow-pull technique
Time Frame: 1 year
A positive diagnosis of malignancy by an EUS biopsy specimen is accepted as a true positive. A benign diagnosis is confirmed by surgical tissue samples when available or clinical follow-up after 1 year.
1 year
Diagnostic yield of wet suction technique
Time Frame: 1 year
A positive diagnosis of malignancy by an EUS biopsy specimen is accepted as a true positive. A benign diagnosis is confirmed by surgical tissue samples when available or clinical follow-up after 1 year.
1 year
Specimen quality score of standard suction
Time Frame: Immediate
EUS-FNA obtained specimen is scored as follows: 1) blood contamination: 0 for severe, 1 for moderate, 2 for few; 2) tissue structure: 0 for none, 1 for 1-2 structures seen, 2 for more than 3 structures seen; 3) cell quantity: 0 for <10/High power field(HPF), 1 for <50/HPF, 2 for >50/HPF; 4) diagnosability: 0 for hard to diagnose, 1 for suspicious diagnose, 2 for definite diagnosis.
Immediate
Specimen quality score of slow-pull
Time Frame: Immediate
EUS-FNA obtained specimen is scored as follows: 1) blood contamination: 0 for severe, 1 for moderate, 2 for few; 2) tissue structure: 0 for none, 1 for 1-2 structures seen, 2 for more than 3 structures seen; 3) cell quantity: 0 for <10/HPF, 1 for <50/HPF, 2 for >50/HPF; 4) diagnosability: 0 for hard to diagnose, 1 for suspicious diagnose, 2 for definite diagnosis.
Immediate
Specimen quality score of wet suction
Time Frame: Immediate
EUS-FNA obtained specimen is scored as follows: 1) blood contamination: 0 for severe, 1 for moderate, 2 for few; 2) tissue structure: 0 for none, 1 for 1-2 structures seen, 2 for more than 3 structures seen; 3) cell quantity: 0 for <10/HPF, 1 for <50/HPF, 2 for >50/HPF; 4) diagnosability: 0 for hard to diagnose, 1 for suspicious diagnose, 2 for definite diagnosis.
Immediate

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse event
Time Frame: 1 week
Including bleeding, infection, pneumonia, perforation and other procedure related adverse events.
1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 18, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

September 17, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 17, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • B2017-195

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Standard suction, slow-pull, wet suction

Subscribe