Extra-Corporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal and Upper Ureteral Stones in Adults Under Locally Infiltrate d Anaesthetics ; a Clinical Randomized Controlled Study

June 12, 2024 updated by: Hosam salah abd elrahim, Assiut University

There are many treatment modalities available for managing renal and upper ureteric stones. They range from completely non-invasive outpatient procedures to invasive procedures requiring hospital admission and increased risks of complications. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a truly non-invasive procedure as opposed to other surgical treatments used, such as retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (1).

The choice between shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and other treatment modalities depends on several factors, including stone site, stone burden, stone CT density, etc. Another compounding factor in choosing the treatment modality is patient preference and expectation (1).

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy is one of the treatment options for patients with renal and ureteral calculi. Even though the procedure is less invasive compared to others. Pain caused by the procedure is a major concern. Several studies recommended the use of either local or systemic analgesia with varying results (2).

As a truly non-invasive treatment option, ESWL has been widely used for treating renal, as well as ureteric, stones with satisfactory efficacy and minimal morbidity. However, the pain caused by ESWL is a major limitation of its efficacy, in addition to the associated patient dissatisfaction and negative experience that may result in the patient refraining from further sessions.

The relationship between pain and ESWL efficacy can be explained by multiple facts: firstly, the pain leads to inability to increase the energy delivered by the shockwaves to optimum levels; secondly, the pain usually leads to significant movement of the patient, as well as excessive respiratory movements, both of which move the stone away from the focus of shockwaves; lastly, the pain may be severe that the session is discontinued before delivery of effective number of shockwaves

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

There are many treatment modalities available for managing renal and upper ureteric stones. They range from completely non-invasive outpatient procedures to invasive procedures requiring hospital admission and increased risks of complications. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a truly non-invasive procedure as opposed to other surgical treatments used, such as retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (1).

The choice between shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and other treatment modalities depends on several factors, including stone site, stone burden, stone CT density, etc. Another compounding factor in choosing the treatment modality is patient preference and expectation (1).

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy is one of the treatment options for patients with renal and ureteral calculi. Even though the procedure is less invasive compared to others. Pain caused by the procedure is a major concern. Several studies recommended the use of either local or systemic analgesia with varying results (2).

As a truly non-invasive treatment option, ESWL has been widely used for treating renal, as well as ureteric, stones with satisfactory efficacy and minimal morbidity. However, the pain caused by ESWL is a major limitation of its efficacy, in addition to the associated patient dissatisfaction and negative experience that may result in the patient refraining from further sessions.

The relationship between pain and ESWL efficacy can be explained by multiple facts: firstly, the pain leads to inability to increase the energy delivered by the shockwaves to optimum levels; secondly, the pain usually leads to significant movement of the patient, as well as excessive respiratory movements, both of which move the stone away from the focus of shockwaves; lastly, the pain may be severe that the session is discontinued before delivery of effective number of shockwaves

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Amr Esam Saad Mohamed Darwish Darwish, Staff member
  • Phone Number: 01015817851
  • Email: amrdarwish@edu.eg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 18 years or older whether males or females with renal or upper ureteric stone(s) candidate for ESWL therapy 2. Renal stones should be between 1- 2 cm and upper ureteric stones should be less than 15 mm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1.. Patients refusing to participate in the study or patients not compliant with follow up 2. Renal stones in ectopic kidneys 3. Radiolucent upper ureteric stones 4. Patients with myo-skeletal deformities e.g. kyphoscoliosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group I (study group)
in which patients will undergo ESWL under locally infiltrated anaesthetic. Using ultrasound guidance, the quadratus lumborum muscle will be identified. Then a mixture of 0.5 % bupivacaine (10 ml) and 2 % lidocaine (10 ml) will be injected into the muscle as a single shot 20 minutes before the procedure.
Drug: locally infilterating anaethesia like lidocaine
which patients will undergo ESWL under locally infiltrated anaesthetic. Using ultrasound guidance, the quadratus lumborum muscle will be identified. Then a mixture of 0.5 % bupivacaine (10 ml) and 2 % lidocaine (10 ml) will be injected into the muscle as a single shot 20 minutes before the procedure.
Other Names:
  • Group I (study group)
Experimental: Group II (control group)

in which patients will undergo ESWL under systemic analgesia. The latter will be achieved using one gram of paracetamol IV infusion at the beginning of the procedure.

In case of unsatisfactory pain control in either group, systemic analgesia using IV Ketorolac injection will be used on demand or the required dose will be recorded at the end of the session.
Drug: general anaethesia

which patients will undergo ESWL under systemic analgesia. The latter will be achieved using one gram of paracetamol IV infusion at the beginning of the procedure.

In case of unsatisfactory pain control in either group, systemic analgesia using IV Ketorolac injection will be used on demand or the required dose will be recorded at the end of the session.

Other Names:
  • Group II (control group)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison between local and systemic analgesia
Time Frame: Baseline
Pain score during the session using visual analogue scale
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison between local and systemic analgesia
Time Frame: Baseline
4. Two-month stone free rate (SFR)
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Assiut University

Investigators

  • Study Director: Salah El-Din Shaker Abdel Hafez, PROFESSOR
  • Study Director: Nasreldin Abdelaal, Assistant Professor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 17, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 17, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Eswl

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stone Ureter

Clinical Trials on locally infilterating anaethesia like lidocaine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Mauritius

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe