Doctor's Counselling Using Culturally-responsive Pamphlet Increased Mammogram Uptake Among Malay-Muslim Women in Singapore

Doctor's Counselling Using Culturally-responsive Pamphlet Increased Mammogram Uptake Among Malay-Muslim Women in Singapore: A Randomized Controlled Trial in a Primary Healthcare Clinic

Investigators conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate effectiveness of doctor's counselling using a culturally-responsive pamphlet in increasing mammogram uptake among Malay-Muslim women attending the clinic. Those in intervention arm received 8-minutes doctor's counselling on mammogram and breast cancer while those in control arm received 8-minutes doctor's counselling on usual care - dietary care. Investigators recruited 319 Malay-Muslim women aged 50-69 years old who have not undergone a mammogram in the past 2 years. Investigators used Poisson regression to determine effectiveness of intervention in increasing mammogram uptake and to determine any change in knowledge, perceptions and faith-based beliefs on breast cancer and mammogram after counselling.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

A randomized control trial was conducted at Jurong Polyclinic with the intervention arm receiving the enhanced culturally appropriate intervention, and the control arm, the usual standard of care for mammography.

Inclusion criteria Malay-Muslim women aged 50-69 years who are citizens and permanent residents of Singapore without known history of breast cancer and have not undergone screening in the last two years will be eligible for the study. These participants were recruited from Jurong Polyclinic when they came for their chronic or acute care needs.

A written informed consent was taken.

Intervention:

The target group received "enhanced intervention" in the form of culturally appropriate pamphlets/flipchart (Annex 1) and doctor counselling. After the counselling, all the women in the intervention group were referred to the staff-in-charge for a mammogram appointment in the polyclinic where they will be able to make an appointment voluntarily. All appointments were given within a period of 3 to 4 weeks. They were also given a pamphlet on breast cancer and mammogram as reinforcement after the counselling.

The control group received the usual standard of care without the "enhanced intervention".

However, they received a "placebo-attention" based on the "Healthy eating guide". Patients in this group took their own initiative to make an appointment for a mammogram.

The counselling to both groups was of a similar duration to control for Hawthorne effect.

Data collection:

Enrolment of eligible participants was by successive presentation at the polyclinic. Single blinding of the participants was done.

Anonymity was maintained by issuing unique identification numbers to all subjects.

Data was collected at baseline and 6 to 8 weeks after intervention. This interval duration is due to limitation of the time frame of the study for the practicum.

The participants filled out a self-administered questionnaire available in Malay, at baseline, to assess their knowledge, attitude, misinformation and perceptions about mammogram. Assistance was given when there was any lack of understanding.

Both the intervention and control groups were advised to come to the polyclinic for follow-up at 6 to 8 weeks. The same self-administered questionnaire on their knowledge, attitude, misinformation and perceptions about mammogram and breast cancer was given to the participants for completion. They were also asked on whether they have gone for a mammogram in the last 6-8 weeks post-intervention. This self-reported mammogram was validated with the medicals records of having had a mammogram.

When the post intervention follow-up at the polyclinic is not possible, an outreach via phone call was done to collect data.

Steps were taken to minimize social desirability bias.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

319

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore, 609788
        • National University Polyclinics

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Malay-Muslim women aged 50-69 years
  • Citizens and permanent residents of Singapore without known history of breast cancer and have not undergone screening in the last two years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • All those except Malay-Muslim women aged 50-69 years who are citizens and permanent residents of Singapore without known history of breast cancer and have not undergone screening in the last two years.
  • Pregnant women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Arm
The target group received "enhanced intervention" in the form of culturally appropriate pamphlets/flipchart and doctor counselling.
Doctor's counselling using Culturally-responsive pamphlet
Placebo Comparator: Control Arm
The control group will receive the usual standard of care without the enhanced intervention.
Doctor's counselling using Culturally-responsive pamphlet

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants who did a mammogram after imparting intervention.
Time Frame: within 6 weeks of enrolment and intervention(both done on the same day
The mammogram uptake was assessed from patient input and verified by Radiographer
within 6 weeks of enrolment and intervention(both done on the same day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shipra Lather, National University Polyclinics (NUP)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 16, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

July 16, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 21, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020/01244

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Patient Counselling

Subscribe