Disinfection Effect of Gaseous Ozone

June 20, 2024 updated by: Firdevs Tulga Öz, Ankara University

Disinfection Effect of Gaseous Ozone on Candida Albicans and Enterococcus Faecalis: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Infected Primary Molars

The current study aimed to investigate the effect of gaseous ozone in disinfection the root canals of primary teeth. Thirty-six primary molars of 36 completely healthy patients (aged 5-10) were included in the study.The included teeth were randomly divided into three groups as follows:

- sodium hypochlorite applied group, ozone applied group, ozone and sodium hypochlorite applied group.The study hypothesized that the antimicrobial efficiency of gaseous ozone would be higher than the other groups compared.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The current clinical randomized study's primary purpose was to investigate the antimicrobial efficiency of gaseous ozone on primary teeth root canals.The included teeth were randomly divided into three groups, and in each group, the root canal therapies of 12 primary teeth were done. In the first group, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite was applied as an irrigation agent. In second group, 0.9% sterile saline solution was combined with 80 seconds.

OzonyTronX® application. 2.5% sodium hypochlorite was applied as an intracanal medicament in combination with 80 seconds OzonyTronX® in the last group. Microbial analyses assessed the colonization of Candida albicans and Enterococcus faecalis before and after the procedure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pediatric patients with no use of an antimicrobial agent in the last 3 months
  • Teeth with positive responses to percussion and palpation, no sinus tract and intra-oral, extra-oral swelling,
  • Teeth with no pathological and physiological mobility, and restorable with stainless steel crown.
  • In radiographical examinations, the selected teeth needed to show the Res(i) and Res (1/4) scores according to the root resorption scoring system
  • No radiolucency in the peri-radicular tissue and no internal-external root resorption were also among the including criteria. However, the teeth with lesions only in 1/3 percent of the bifurcation area were also included in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are not compatible with including criteria,
  • Who cannot adopt the dental treatments,
  • with whom rubber-dam İsolation was not possible were excluded from the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 2.5% NaOCl
2.5% NaOCl was applied as a root canal irrigation agent.
10 mL 2.5% NaOCl application followed the mechanical preparation. After 2 mL 0.9% saline application, the second samples were taken by placing a sterile cone in the largest canal of the tooth (distal canal for 60 seconds). The mesiobuccal and distobuccal canals were closed with a sterile cotton pellet while the samples were taken. After the application, the root canal filling was completed with a calcium hydroxide-containing paste (TgPex™, London, England), glass ionomer cement (Ionofil U, Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany) was placed, and the teeth were restored with a Stainless-Steel Crown (3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany)
Experimental: 0.9% sterile saline solution combined with 80 seconds OzonyTronX®
0.9% sterile saline solution was combined with 80 seconds OzonyTronX® application as a root canal irrigation procedure.
The canals were irrigated with 10 mL 0.9% sterile saline. Ozone treatment (OzonyTronX with CA probe) was applied for 80 seconds, and 2 mL 0.9% saline application was performed. Finally, the second samples were taken by the method described in group with 2.5% NaOCl, and the canal treatment was completed.
Experimental: 2.5% NaOCl with 80 seconds OzonyTronX®
2.5% NaOCl was applied as an intracanal medicament in combination with 80 seconds OzonyTronX®
The disinfection of root canals was done using 10 mL, 2.5% NaOCl, and ozone treatment for 80 seconds, and 2 mL 0.9% saline application was performed. Finally, the second samples were taken by the method described in group with %2.5 NaOCl, and the canal treatment was completed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Values of C. albicans and E. faecalis prior to the application and following the applications
Time Frame: 6 months
The results of the descriptive statistical analyses of the values of C. albicans and E. faecalis prior to the application and following the applications were shown in Log CFU.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment the change in the amount of C. albicans and E. faecalis in percentage following irrigation/disinfection procedures
Time Frame: 6 months
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test determined the change in the microorganisms in root canals in percentage to compare the effect of irrigation procedures (E. faecalis and C. albicans) (intergroup comparisons-between the groups).
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Firdevs TULGA OZ, Ankara University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 26, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 12, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

August 12, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 15, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 24, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 24, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 3/6

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endodontic Treatment

Subscribe