i-CBT and IV Ketamine for Suicidality in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized, Midazolam-Controlled Clinical Trial (Ket-CBT)

November 28, 2025 updated by: University Health Network, Toronto

Integrated Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (i-CBT) and Intravenous Ketamine for Suicidality in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized, Midazolam-Controlled Clinical Trial

Approximately four thousand Canadians die by suicide every year, and suicide is the second leading cause of death in youth and young adults (15-34 years). Most people with depression experience thoughts of suicide and many will also plan and/or attempt suicide at some time in their life. There is an urgent need for new scalable treatments that can effectively reduce suicidality in people with depression.

Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) reduces suicidal thoughts and behaviours, and can be delivered through the internet (i-CBT) making it more accessible and scalable. However, i-CBT has not been shown to rapidly reduce suicidal thoughts and behaviours (suicidality), such as within 24 hours. IV ketamine on the other hand has been shown to rapidly reduce thoughts of suicide, but not suicidal behaviours.

Therefore, combining i-CBT with IV ketamine may be more effective reducing suicidality than i-CBT treatment with a control treatment.

The investigators propose a 13-week, multi-site, study that looks at how combining i-CBT and IV ketamine treatment will affect suicidality in individuals with depression who have recently experienced suicidal thoughts and/or behaviours, but have not responded to previous treatment. All 110 participants will receive a weekly session of i-CBT for 13 weeks, but half will be randomly assigned to also receive six IV ketamine treatments or six IV midazolam treatments (control treatment) over the first initial 30 days. The investigators will measure changes in suicidal thoughts and behaviours before drug treatment and at the primary endpoint (i.e.,day 30), and after 3 months (i.e. Day 91) of the starting treatment.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

110

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • Recruiting
        • Toronto General Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Rodrigo Mansur, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Provide written, voluntary informed consent prior to study enrollment. Substitute decision makers will not be allowed to consent to study on a potential patient's behalf.
  2. Male or female between the age of 21 to 65, inclusive.
  3. Meets DSM-5 criteria for Major Depressive Disorder, currently experiencing a Major Depressive Episode (MDE) without psychotic features. Diagnosis will be confirmed using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) conducted by a delegated physician or trained research study staff.
  4. Must present with a moderate to severe depressive episode, as determined by the MADRS score greater than 21.
  5. Must be at risk for suicide, operationalized as a response of 'yes' to items 1 or 2 on the Suicidal Ideation subscale or 'yes to any item of the Suicidal Behaviour subscale on the C-SSRS.
  6. Current MDE has inadequate response to two or more adequate first-line treatment trials for MDD, as per the 2016 CANMAT Depression Guidelines.
  7. Access to reliable internet for the entire study period and an internet-based device (i.e., a smartphone, laptop, desktop or tablet).
  8. Must have the ability to speak and read English. This is due to the i-CBT modules only being offered in English presently.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Currently has symptoms of mania or hypomania or mixed state bipolar, as determined by the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score greater than 12.
  2. Current symptoms of psychosis or a substance use disorder within the past 3 months. Past history of psychotic features during a mood episode will not be excluded. Other secondary psychiatric comorbidities (e.g. anxiety disorders, trauma related disorders, etc.) will not be excluded.
  3. Lifetime history of a primary psychotic disorder (including, but not limited to, schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder).
  4. Lifetime history of ketamine use disorder.
  5. History of neurological disorders (including, but not limited to, uncontrolled seizure disorder, history of stroke within past 12 months, major head injuries, aneurysmal vascular disease [including thoracic and abdominal aorta, intracranial, and peripheral arterial vessels], arteriovenous malformation, or intracerebral hemorrhage).
  6. Presence a relative or absolute contraindication to ketamine or midazolam, including a drug allergy, stroke history, uncontrolled hypertension, low or labile blood pressure (as defined by a baseline systolic blood pressure > 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg), recent myocardial infarction within past 12 months, cardiac arrhythmia, severe coronary artery disease, heart failure or moderate to severe hepatic impairment (defined as a Child-Pugh score of B or C) or severe renal impairment (glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 45 milliliters/min).
  7. Pregnant or breastfeeding women or women who intend to get pregnant. Patients who are sexually active must agree to use a highly effective contraceptive method.
  8. Use of prohibited concomitant medications, which includes other forms of ketamine including racemic ketamine and esketamine, benzodiazepines, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, stimulants or medical cannabis of any form. All other medications will be permitted.
  9. Currently receiving CBT or CBT-related interventions (e.g., Dialectical Behavioural Therapy).
  10. Changes in medication or non-CBT psychotherapy one month prior to study enrollment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: i-CBT and IV ketamine
Participants will receive internet-based cognitive therapy (i-CBT) for 13 weeks. During the first 4 weeks of i-CBT, participants will also be administered 6 infusions of ketamine intravenously. The first two infusions will be dosed at 0.5 mg/kg over a period of 40 mins. For infusions 3 and 4, patients will be flexibly-dosed between 0.5 mg/kg to 0.75 mg/kg, depending on clinical response to first two infusions. For infusions 5 and 6, patients will be flexibly-dosed between 0.5-0.85 mg/kg, depending on the clinical response to the first 4 infusions.
55 patients will receive ketamine hydrochloride, over six infusions, flexibly dosed between 0.5 mg/kg to 0.85 mg/kg.
Each week for 13 weeks, participants will watch an online module that last approximately 45-50 mins each, with homework at the end of each module. Homework is submitted and reviewed by a therapist, who will provide personalized feedback before progression to the next module.
Active Comparator: i-CBT and IV midazolam
Participants will receive internet-based cognitive therapy (i-CBT) for 13 weeks. During the first 4 weeks of i-CBT, participants will also be administered 6 infusions of midazolam intravenously. The first two infusions will be dosed at 0.02 mg/kg over a period of 40 mins. For infusions 3 and 4, patients will be flexibly-dosed between 0.02 mg/kg to 0.03 mg/kg, depending on clinical response to first two infusions. For infusions 5 and 6, patients will be flexibly-dosed between 0.02 mg/kg to 0.035 mg/kg, depending on the clinical response to the first 4 infusions.
Each week for 13 weeks, participants will watch an online module that last approximately 45-50 mins each, with homework at the end of each module. Homework is submitted and reviewed by a therapist, who will provide personalized feedback before progression to the next module.
55 patients will receive midazolam hydrochloride, over six infusions, flexibly dosed between 0.02 mg/kg to 0.035 mg/kg.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Suicidality severity using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
Time Frame: 30 Days, up to 91 Days.
The CSSRS evaluates suicidal ideation and behaviour. The CSSRS evaluates suicidal ideation and behaviour. The suicidal ideation score ranges from 0 (no ideation) to 5 (active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent). Suicidal ideation intensity score ranges from 0 (no ideation) to 25 (most severe). The presence of suicidal behaviour is rated as a binary response; the lethality of actual attempts are rated on a scale of 0 (no or very minor physical damage) to 5 (death) and the potential lethality of actual attempts are rated on a scale of 0 (behaviour not likely to result in injury) to 2 (behaviour likely to result in death despite available medical care).
30 Days, up to 91 Days.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective Depressive Symptom Severity using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Time Frame: Day 30, Day 91
The MADRS is a scale measuring objective depression severity, consisting of 10 items, each scored from 0 (normal) to 6 (severe), for a total possible score of 60; higher scores denote greater severity.
Day 30, Day 91
Subjective Depressive Symptom Severity using the McIntyre and Rosenblat Rapid Response Scale (MARRRS)
Time Frame: Day 30, Day 91
The MARRRS is a self-reported 14-item self-report measure of depressive symptoms present during the past 72 hours. Total score ranges from 0 to 42; a higher score indicates greater symptom severity.
Day 30, Day 91
Subjective Depressive Symptom Severity using Quick Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology, Self-Report, 16-item (QIDS-SR-16)
Time Frame: Day 30, Day 91
The QIDS-SR-16 total score ranges from 0 to 27 with 0 representing no depression and 27 representing severe depression.
Day 30, Day 91
Symptom Severity and Treatment response using the Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI)
Time Frame: Day 30, Day 91
The CGI severity module assesses the severity of a person's depressive illness using a seven-point Likert scale, ranging from "Normal, not at all depressed" to "Among the most extremely depressed patients". The CGI improvement module evaluates the global improvement of a person's condition since their last visit on a seven-point Likert scale, ranging from "Very much improved" to "Very much worse".
Day 30, Day 91
Dissociative Symptom Severity using the Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS), 23-item
Time Frame: 30 minutes Post-Infusion
The CADSS measures objective dissociative symptom severity post infusion. Total scores on the 23-item CADSS range from 0 to 92; a higher score denotes greater dissociative symptom severity.
30 minutes Post-Infusion
Treatment-Emergent Psychiatric Symptoms using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)
Time Frame: 30 minutes Post infusion, Day 30, Day 91
The BPRS rating scale has 18 items, each item rated on a severity scale of 1 (not present) to 7 (extremely severe). 0 is entered if the item is not assessed.
30 minutes Post infusion, Day 30, Day 91
Treatment-Emergent Manic Symptoms using the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)
Time Frame: 30 minutes Post infusion, Day 30, Day 91
The Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) is a clinical interview scale to assess the severity of manic states and in this study to look at treatment-emergent mania. Total scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicative of greater symptom severity.
30 minutes Post infusion, Day 30, Day 91
Mystical Type Experiences using the Mystical Experiences Questionnaire (MEQ)
Time Frame: 30 minutes Post Infusion, Day 30, Day 91
The MEQ consists of 30 items, each item rated on a Likert scale (0-None/not at all to 5-Extreme, more than any other time in my life). The MEQ total score is computed by taking the average response to all items.
30 minutes Post Infusion, Day 30, Day 91
Subjective Wellbeing using the World Health Organization-5 Well-Being Index (WHO-5)
Time Frame: Day 30, Day 91
The WHO-5 is a measure of overall well-being, rated on a scale of 0 to 25, with higher scores denoting higher quality of life.
Day 30, Day 91
Impairments in Work and Activities using the World Productivity and Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI)
Time Frame: Day 30, Day 91
The WPAI is a six-item self-administered rating scale measuring work absenteeism, presenteeism, and productivity loss and daily activity impairment. Individuals are asked to rate to what extent health problems affected their ability to do regular daily activities other than work at a job (0-No effect on daily activities to 10-Completely prevented me from doing my daily activities). Respondents who are currently employed are additionally asked to rate the number of hours missed from work due to health problems, the number of hours missed due to other reasons (e.g., vacation, time off to participate in this study), and the number of hours worked in the past seven days, as well as to what extent health problems affected productivity while working (0-No effect on my work to 10-Completely prevented me from working). Responses to each question are scaled to an overall percentage score (0 to 100), with higher values denoting greater impairment
Day 30, Day 91
Subjective Cognitive Impairment using the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire - Depression - 5-Item (PDQ-5-D)
Time Frame: Day 30, Day 91
The PDQ-5-D total scores range from 0 to 20, with greater scores indicative of greater subjective cognitive impairment.
Day 30, Day 91
Cognitive Function using the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST)
Time Frame: Day 30, Day 91
The DSST assesses relative contributions of speed, memory, executive function and visual scanning. Participants are required to copy symbols that are paired with simple geometric shapes or numbers within 90 seconds for a total possible score of 0 to 90. A higher score reflects greater performance.
Day 30, Day 91
Cognitive Processing Speed using the Trail Making Test A (TMT-A)
Time Frame: Day 30, Day 91
The TMT is a two-part cognitive test. TMT-A assesses cognitive processing speed and consists of 25 circles distributed over a sheet of paper. Participants are asked to connect circles in numerical sequence. If a participant makes a mistake, the administrator points out the error, and the participant must return to the last correct circle and continue the task. Lower scores represent better performance.
Day 30, Day 91
Executing Functioning using the Trail Making Test B (TMT-B)
Time Frame: Day 30, Day 91
The TMT is a two-part cognitive test. TMT-B assesses executive functioning and consists of 25 circles distributed over a sheet of paper. Participants are asked to connect circles in alternating numerical and alphabetical sequence (e.g., 1-A-2-B). If a participant makes a mistake, the administrator points out the error, and the participant must return to the last correct circle and continue the task. Lower scores represent better performance.
Day 30, Day 91
Anxiety using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Day 30, Day 91
Total score ranges from 0 to 21; a higher score denotes greater symptom severity.
Day 30, Day 91
Hedonic/Pleasure Capacity using the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS)
Time Frame: Day 30, Day 91
The SHAPS total score ranges from 14 to 56, wherein a higher score indicates greater hedonic capacity (lower anhedonic severity).
Day 30, Day 91
Reaction Time using the Choice Reaction Time Identification Task (CRT)
Time Frame: Day 30, Day 91

For the CRT, 4 boxes are presented on the screen in a horizontal array. Each box has an assigned response key (by default, the response keys are matched spatially to the position of their assigned boxes: DFJK).

After a fixed amount of time, one of the boxes turns red and participants are asked to press the corresponding response key as fast as possible. The response time for correct responses is recorded, with larger numbers representing slower reaction time.

Day 30, Day 91
Psychomotor signs of depression using the Core Assessment of Psychomotor Change (CORE)
Time Frame: Day 30, Day 91
The CORE is an observer-rated instrument evaluating cognitive processing disorders (non-interactiveness), agitation, and motor retardation. Scores range from 0 to 54, with higher scores representing more psychomotor signs of depression.
Day 30, Day 91
Verbal Fluency using the FAS test
Time Frame: Day 30, Day 91
The F-A-S Test assesses phonemic verbal fluency by requesting an individual to orally produce words that begin with the letters F, A and S. High scores indicate better phonemic verbal fluency.
Day 30, Day 91
Verbal Memory using the California Verbal Learning Test Second Edition (CVLT-II)
Time Frame: Day 30, Day 91
In the CVLT-II, a participant listens to series of words and is then asked to recall the terms and the category to which they belong. Higher total scores for words recognized on recognition trial indicate better verbal memory.
Day 30, Day 91
Loneliness using the UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA)
Time Frame: Day 30, Day 91
The UCLA assesses subjective measures of loneliness and social isolation. Scores range from 0-60 with higher scores indicating more subjective loneliness
Day 30, Day 91
Subjective Perception of pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, well-being, and shortness of breath using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised (ESAS-r)
Time Frame: Day 30, Day 91
The ESAS-r assesses 10 common symptoms: pain, tiredness, drowsiness, nausea, lack of appetite, shortness of breath, depression, anxiety, well-being and constipation. It conveys the individual's description of the severity of a symptom based on a scale ranging from 0 to 10. With higher scores indicating higher symptom severity
Day 30, Day 91
Symptoms of PTSD using the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)
Time Frame: Day 30, Day 91
The PCL-5 is a 20-item self-administered measure that assesses the 20 DSM-5 symptoms of PTSD. The total scores range from 0-80, with higher scores indicating more symptom severity for PTSD.
Day 30, Day 91
Borderline Personality Disorder Symptoms using the Borderline Symptom List (BSL-23)
Time Frame: Day 30, Day 91
The BSL-23 is a 23-item self-rating instrument for specific assessment of borderline personality disorder (BPD) symptomatology. The average score of items (range 0 to 4, sum of scores divided by 23) is calculated, with a higher score indicating more impairment.
Day 30, Day 91
Sleep Quality using the The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: Day 30, Day 91
The PSQI is a self-rated questionnaire which assesses sleep quality and disturbances over a 1-month time interval. The global PSQI score ranges from 0-21, with higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality
Day 30, Day 91
Automatic negative self-schema using the Depression Implicit Association Test (Depression IAT)
Time Frame: Day 30, Day 91
The Depression IAT measures the strength of automatic (implicit) associations between concepts (SAD and HAPPY) in people's minds relying on latency measures in a simple sorting task. Scores range from -1 to 1, with positive scores indicating a stronger association between 'ME-SAD' and 'NOT ME-HAPPY' and negative scores indicating a stronger association between 'ME-HAPPY' and 'NOT ME-SAD'.
Day 30, Day 91
Depression Rumination using the The 10-item ruminative response scale (RRS-10)
Time Frame: Day 30, Day 91
Severity of Depression Rumination is measured using the RRS-10. Scores range from 10 to 40, with higher scores indicating more severe depression rumination.
Day 30, Day 91
i-CBT engagement using number of logins per day into i-CBT platform
Time Frame: Weekly up to Day 91.
Number of logins per day into the i-CBT platform is measured to assess i-CBT engagement.
Weekly up to Day 91.
i-CBT engagement using amount of time logged into the i-CBT platform.
Time Frame: Weekly up to Day 91.
Amount of time logged in on the i-CBT platform (in minutes) is measured to assess i-CBT engagement.
Weekly up to Day 91.
i-CBT engagement using time spent on each i-CBT module
Time Frame: Weekly up to Day 91.
Time spent on each i-CBT session is measured to assess i-CBT engagement.
Weekly up to Day 91.
i-CBT engagement
Time Frame: Weekly up to Day 91.
Number of logins per day, amount of time logged in, time spent on each session, time of day logged in, and time spent in each section of the module of the internet-based CBT will be measured to assess i-CBT engagement.
Weekly up to Day 91.
Addiction Potential Using the Drug Liking and Craving Questionnaire (DLCQ)
Time Frame: 30 minutes Post Infusion, at Day 30, weekly after Day 30 up to Day 91.
The likeability and craving for the study drug is assessed using the DLCQ. Likeability scores range from 0-10, with higher scores indicating more likeability. How much the participant is craving the study drug is rated on a scale of 0-10, with higher scores indicating more cravings. Craving for using greater amounts ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more craving for greater amounts of study drug.
30 minutes Post Infusion, at Day 30, weekly after Day 30 up to Day 91.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rodrigo Mansur, University Health Network, Toronto

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 2, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 28, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 5, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Suicide

Clinical Trials on Ketamine hydrochloride

Subscribe