M-TAPA vs Intraperitoneal Bupivacain vs Intraperitoneal Bupivacain +Dexmedetomidin

October 24, 2024 updated by: Fatih Balcı, Sivas State Hospital

Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine, Bupivacaine and Dexmedetomidine With Modified-Pericondrial Approach Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block (M-TAPA) in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgeries

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a common abdominal surgery in Western countries, favored for its minimal invasiveness, leading to less pain, smaller scars, and quicker recovery. Despite its benefits, it is contraindicated in cases of bleeding disorders, peritonitis, hemodynamic instability, severe heart failure, and advanced COPD. Effective postoperative pain management is crucial for faster recovery, shorter hospital stays, and lower costs, using techniques such as intravenous or intramuscular analgesics, epidural analgesia, and local anesthetic injections like TAP block or M-TAPA block. The TAPA block, introduced in 2019, involves applying local anesthetic to the costochondral junction, affecting thoracoabdominal nerves, with a modified version (M- TAPA) applying anesthetic to the lower surface only. Studies have shown M-TAPA's efficacy in reducing pain and analgesic use postoperatively. Postoperative pain from laparoscopic cholecystectomy mainly arises from inflammation in the gallbladder bed and pneumoperitoneum. This study aims to evaluate the postoperative analgesic efficacy of intraperitoneal bupivacaine, bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine, and M-TAPA block by assessing pain scores and analgesic consumption in a prospective, randomized, double- blind trial with 45 patients. Patients will be assigned to three groups: M- TAPA block, intraperitoneal bupivacaine, and intraperitoneal bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine, with an experienced anesthetist administering the blocks and evaluating outcomes to compare these pain management techniques.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Sivas, Turkey
        • Fatih Balci

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery planned
  • ASA #-II-III classification
  • Willingness to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bleeding disorders
  • Signs of infection at the block application site
  • Conversion to open surgery
  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • Unstable hemodynamics
  • Inability to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: m-tapa
three different methods will be applied to reduce patients' postoperative pain
Experimental: intraperitoneal bupivacain
three different methods will be applied to reduce patients' postoperative pain
Experimental: intraperitoneal bupivacain+dexmedetomidin
three different methods will be applied to reduce patients' postoperative pain

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain scores
Time Frame: Time Frame: 24 hours after the procedure
zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable
Time Frame: 24 hours after the procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
total analgesic consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours after the procedure
total rescue analgesic consumption of patients will be evaluated
24 hours after the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • m-tapa vs intraperiton

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Regional Anesthesia Morbidity

Clinical Trials on application for postoperative analgesia

Subscribe