- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06509373
A Portal-based Advance Care Planning Intervention Among Community-Dwelling Persons Living With Cognitive Impairment (Portal-Voice)
May 21, 2026 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences
The purpose of this research is to examine the feasibility of using a patient portal based advance care planning (ACP) tool to improve ACP discussions and documentation in persons living with cognitive impairment in outpatient primary care.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The goal of this study is to explore whether sending a portal-based ACP tool (called ACPVoice) paired with a motivational message within the patient portal before a routine primary care physician visit can improve ACP discussions and documentation within the electronic health record among persons living with cognitive impairment in outpatient primary care.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
300
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
North Carolina
-
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 65 years old and older
- Diagnosis of recognized or probable mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia or elevated eRADAR score
- Completed visit with their primary care provider (PCP) within the past 12 months and have upcoming PCP visit in next 6 months
- Have an active patient portal account
Exclusion Criteria:
- Lives in a long-term care facility
- Severe vision impairment/blindness (as they need to be able to read portal messages)
- Enrolled in hospice
- Lacks decisional capacity as deemed by PCP
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: ACPVoice Intervention
Community-dwelling persons living with cognitive impairment aged 65 and older with known or probable mild cognitive impairment or dementia or elevated eRADAR score (with decision-making capacity), who are affiliated with the Atrium-Wake Forest Baptist Health , have a primary care physician at one of the participating sites, and have an active patient portal account.
|
Eligible patients will be sent a secure MyChart message with a motivational message asking them to complete the advance care planning tool (ACPVoice) with their care partner/surrogate decision-maker or loved one before their upcoming primary care visit.
The ACPVoice tool will be attached electronically to the mychart message.
A reminder message will be sent to an non-responders with a different motivational message.
|
|
Active Comparator: Standard of Care
Community-dwelling persons living with cognitive impairment aged 65 and older with known or probable mild cognitive impairment or dementia or elevated eRADAR score (with decision-making capacity), who are affiliated with the Atrium-Wake Forest Baptist Health, have a primary care physician within the Atrium-Wake Forest Baptist Health Network, and have an active patient portal account.
|
Patients will have access to the standardized advance care planning questionnaires readily available already within their mychart account which is part of standard of care.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Reach/Engagement
Time Frame: 6 months post intervention
|
Percentage of participants who open the advance care planning tool (ACPVoice) mychart message
|
6 months post intervention
|
|
Intervention Completion
Time Frame: 6 months post intervention
|
Percentage of participants who were sent the ACPVoice mychart message that complete the ACPVoice tool.
|
6 months post intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Advance Care Planning Documentation Rates by Primary Care Providers
Time Frame: 12 months pre intervention
|
Documentation of advance care planning within the electronic health record by primary care provider.
|
12 months pre intervention
|
|
Advance Care Planning Documentation Rates by Primary Care Providers
Time Frame: 6 months post intervention
|
Documentation of advance care planning within the electronic health record by primary care provider.
|
6 months post intervention
|
|
Advance Care Planning Billing Code Usage
Time Frame: 12 months pre intervention
|
Advance care planning billing codes usages will be recorded.
|
12 months pre intervention
|
|
Advance Care Planning Billing Code Usage
Time Frame: 6 months post intervention
|
Advance care planning billing codes usages will be recorded.
|
6 months post intervention
|
|
Documented Designated Surrogate Decision Maker
Time Frame: 12 months pre intervention
|
Measured by number of designated surrogate decision makers documented in the electronic health record.
|
12 months pre intervention
|
|
Documented Designated Surrogate Decision Maker
Time Frame: 6 months post intervention
|
Measured by number of designated surrogate decision makers documented in the electronic health record.
|
6 months post intervention
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of Advance Care Planning Documentation
Time Frame: 6 months during the implementation period and up to 6 months post the implementation period
|
High-quality advance care planning documentation will be defined as addressing ≥4 of the 8 core components with 1 point assigned for each of the following questions related to: health-related goals, what matters most/most important in their life, health-related worries/concerns, named surrogate decision-maker, how much information they would like to know, unacceptable states at the end-of-life, goals if their health was to worsen, and questions about advance care planning forms.
Score of 0-8 with 0 indicating no advance care planning questions answered to 8 indicating eight core advance care planning questions answered.
|
6 months during the implementation period and up to 6 months post the implementation period
|
|
Telephone Advance Care Planning Completion Rates
Time Frame: 6 months during the implementation period and up to 6 months post the implementation period
|
Defined as the number of patients who complete the advance care planning tool (ACPVoice) over the telephone.
|
6 months during the implementation period and up to 6 months post the implementation period
|
|
Paper Advance Care Planning Documentation Rates
Time Frame: 6 months during the implementation period and up to 6 months post the implementation period
|
Defined as the number of patients who were mailed and completed the advance care planning tool (ACPVoice) via mail.
|
6 months during the implementation period and up to 6 months post the implementation period
|
|
Participant Confidence related to PCP knowing what is important to them
Time Frame: 6 months during the implementation period and up to 6 months post the implementation period
|
Data will be collected via a RedCap survey asking 5 questions: i.
How confident are you your primary care clinician/team knows what is important to you?, ii.
How confident are you that what is important to you will determine the medical care you receive in the future?
, iii.
To what extent did completing this care planning tool increase or decrease your sense of control over medical decisions?, iv.
Before completing the care planning tool, did your primary care clinician/team ask what is important to you? , and v.
After completing the care planning tool, did your primary care clinician/team ask what is important to you? .
|
6 months during the implementation period and up to 6 months post the implementation period
|
|
Feeling Heard and Understood
Time Frame: 6 months during the implementation period and up to 6 months post the implementation period
|
Data will be assessed via a RedCap survey with 4 questions: I felt heard and understood by this provider and team, I felt this provider and team put my best interests first when making recommendations about my care, I felt this provider and team saw me as a person, not just someone with a medical problem, I felt this provider and team understood what is important to me in my life.
|
6 months during the implementation period and up to 6 months post the implementation period
|
|
Digital Health Literacy
Time Frame: 6 months during the implementation period and up to 6 months post the implementation period
|
Data will be measured using the Brief Digital Health Care Literacy Scale.
|
6 months during the implementation period and up to 6 months post the implementation period
|
|
Preference-concordant care
Time Frame: 6 months during the implementation period and up to 6 months post the implementation period
|
Data will be collected via Redcap survey asking "How strongly do you agree or disagree that your current medical/treatment plan meets your preferences".
|
6 months during the implementation period and up to 6 months post the implementation period
|
|
Barrier to Adoption
Time Frame: 6 months during the implementation period and up to 6 months post the implementation period
|
Data will be collected via qualitative interviews with participants and providers.
|
6 months during the implementation period and up to 6 months post the implementation period
|
|
Provider Survey Score
Time Frame: 6 months post implementation period
|
17 multiple choice items regarding provider opinion on the interventions acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility and overall satisfaction.
Total score range is 17-84 with a higher score indicating a more favorable opinion of the intervention.
|
6 months post implementation period
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jennifer Gabbard, MD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
August 19, 2024
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 27, 2025
Study Completion (Actual)
June 27, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 12, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 12, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
July 19, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 26, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 21, 2026
Last Verified
December 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Brain Diseases
- Central Nervous System Diseases
- Nervous System Diseases
- Mental Disorders
- Neurocognitive Disorders
- Cognition Disorders
- Cognitive Dysfunction
- Dementia
- Health Services Administration
- Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation
- Quality of Health Care
- Quality Indicators, Health Care
- Patient Care Management
- Patient Care Planning
- Comprehensive Health Care
- Standard of Care
- Advance Care Planning
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB00112143
- 5K23AG070234-03 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Advanced Care Planning
-
The University of Hong KongRecruitingAdvanced Care PlanningHong Kong
-
Montreal Heart InstituteUnknownAdvanced Care PlanningCanada
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institute on Aging (NIA); University of Minnesota; University of California... and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
Yale UniversityNational Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)Completed
-
University of California, Los AngelesUniversity of California, San Francisco; University of California, IrvineCompletedAdvanced Cancer | Advance Care Planning | Advance DirectivesUnited States
-
National University of SingaporeNot yet recruitingEnd of Life Care | Advanced Care Planning (ACP) | Death Anxiety | Death Attitude (Implicit/Explicit)Singapore
-
Boston Medical CenterCompletedPalliative Care | Advance Care PlanningUnited States
-
University of Colorado, DenverCompletedPrimary Health Care | Advance Care PlanningUnited States
-
Southcentral FoundationUniversity of Colorado, Denver; University of Washington; University of Arkansas and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institute on Aging (NIA)RecruitingAdvance Care PlanningUnited States
Clinical Trials on Advance Care Planning Tool - ACPVoice
-
George Washington UniversityUniversity of Pittsburgh; Medstar Health Research Institute; Quality Insights; Renal... and other collaboratorsCompletedChronic Kidney DiseasesUnited States
-
Massachusetts General HospitalCompletedEnd Stage Liver DiseaseUnited States
-
Western Carolina UniversityNational Institute of Nursing Research (NINR); Pacific Institute for Research...CompletedAdvance Care PlanningUnited States
-
University of FloridaFlorida Department of HealthCompleted
-
Baystate Medical CenterPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; University of New Mexico; Northeastern...Completed
-
University of PittsburghNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedCancer | Advance Care PlanningUnited States
-
Food and Health Bureau, Hong KongYan Chai HospitalCompleted
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaCompletedDementia | Advanced Care PlanningUnited States
-
McMaster UniversityCanadian Frailty NetworkCompletedChronic Disease | Frail Elderly SyndromeCanada
-
Food and Health Bureau, Hong KongCompletedChronic DiseaseHong Kong