A Community-based Advance Care Planning Programme for Patients With Advanced Disease

August 18, 2016 updated by: Dr. Helen YL Chan, Food and Health Bureau, Hong Kong

A Community-based Advance Care Planning Programme to Improve End-of-life Care in Patients With Advanced Disease: A Mixed-method Approach

Advance care planning has been recommended as an integral part of care for patients with life-limiting disease, but relevant development in Hong Kong is still in its infancy. This proposed study attempts to address this service gap by promoting advance care planning to patients with advanced disease. It is hypothesized that the proportion of patients whose end-of-life care preferences were known in the experimental group will be significantly higher than that in the control group.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study aims to evaluate the impacts of a community-based advance care planning programme on end-of-life care of patients with advanced disease. A mixed-method approach, including a randomized controlled trial and qualitative interviews, will be used. Participants in the experimental group will received a structured advance care planning programme delivered by a trained facilitator. It includes an educational component, reflection and a family meeting.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

239

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Haven of Hope Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged 18 or above
  • meet one of the three triggers for supportive /palliative care as suggested in the Gold Standards Framework
  • living at home
  • being communicable

Exclusion Criteria:

  • mentally incompetent
  • cannot nominate a family carer
  • have already signed an advance directive
  • have been referred to palliative care service

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Advance care planning programme
Participants in the experimental group will receive a structured advance care planning programme, namely Let Me Talk, delivered by a trained nurse facilitator. The programme will be conducted on individual basis through three one-hour home visits, once weekly. Family carers of the participants will be invited to all sessions.
It is a multi-faceted programme which includes an educational component with support of multimedia materials, reflection on personal values and a facilitated discussion between patient and family carer over future care. It will be delivered to each pair of participant and family carer on individual basis. By the end of the programme, each participant will have a personal workbook summarising the advance care planning process for record.
No Intervention: Usual care
Participants in the control group will receive three weekly home visits with basic health assessment and education provided by the trained nurse facilitator. If they request advance care planning information or assistance, an advance directive form, which is available on the Internet for public access, will be provided to them for their information.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
End-of-life care preferences
Time Frame: 6 months
In this study, end-of-life care preferences include goal for end-of-life care and decisions over the use of life-sustaining treatments relevant to individual's anticipated health changes. So, whether the patients' end-of-life care preferences is known at different timepoints will be determined based on (1) the congruence between patients' end-of-life care preferences and family carers' predicted end-of-life care preferences for patients; and (2) whether patients' end-of-life preferences are documented in their medical record.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Level of certainty about future care
Time Frame: 6 months
The SURE test (Legare, Kearing, Clay, Gagnon, D'Amours, Rousseau & O'Connor, 2010) will be used to measure the patient's level of decisional conflict in making decisions related to future care. Patients will be asked to rate their certainty in their future care on four items by using a dichotomous response format: yes or no. Good construct validity and reliability were demonstrated. It has previously been translated into Chinese and tested among local older people .
6 months
Health care utilization
Time Frame: 6 months
Patient's medical records will be retrieved retrospectively six months after their enrolment to review their health care utilization over the study period, including the number of visits to the emergency department, unplanned admission, length of hospital stay, as well as investigation, procedures and treatment received.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Helen Chan, RN PhD, The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • Principal Investigator: Diana Lee, RN PhD, The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • Principal Investigator: Carmen Chan, RN PhD, The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • Principal Investigator: Iris Lee, RN PhD, The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • Principal Investigator: Doris Leung, PhD, The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

February 21, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 19, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 11120861

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Disease

Clinical Trials on Advance care planning programme

3
Subscribe