Methacholine Challenge Test (MCT) in Healthy Adults

September 17, 2024 updated by: Thomas Ringbæk, Allergi- og Lungeklinikken, Elsinore

Methacholine Challenge Test (MCT) in Healthy Adults: Oscillometry Measured Alone Compared to Oscillometry and FEV1 During the Same Test

Knowledge of Methacholine Challenge Test (MCT) and impedance Oscillometry (IOS) is limited. Only three studies have included adult patients, and none of these with healthy controls. The three studies have combined IOS and spirometry in the same test, although it is not recommended to perform IOS after a test that requires deep breathing, e.g. FEV1 measurement. Deep breathing is considered to affect the impedance via reduced tone in the smooth muscle.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Asthma is a common chronic disease that is characterized by a history of variable respiratory symptoms and variable expiratory airflow limitation, and usually associated with airway hyperresponsiveness.

In general, FEV1 is used to test for airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), and a 20% decrease after methacholine challenge test (MCT) is considered a positive test.

There is increasing recognition that the small airways are involved in 40-80% of patients with asthma, and the function of these airways is overlooked (the "silent zone") when measuring FEV1, which mainly reflects the function of the central airways.

Small airway dysfunction (SAD) can be assessed by IOS where pressure applied to the airways at a range of frequencies, and components of respiratory resistance and reactance are measured. Resistance at 5 Hz (R5) and 20 Hz (R20), respectively, represent total airway resistance and proximal airway resistance. The difference between these two values can be calculated (R5-R20). High R5-R20 and low reactance at 5 Hz (X5) indicate the presence of SAD.

Knowledge of MCT and IOS is limited. Only three studies have included adult patients, and none of these with healthy controls. These studies have combined IOS and spirometry in the same test, although it is not recommended to perform IOS after a test that requires deep breathing, e.g. FEV1 measurement. Deep breathing is considered to affect the impedance via reduced tone in the smooth muscle.

The investigators have the following objectives for these studies:

  1. To determine the IOS response to MCT in healthy adults.
  2. To investigate whether spirometry (FEV1) carried out in relation to MCT influences IOS by comparing the IOS response to MCT performed with and without spirometry in healthy adults.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

25

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Healthy adults

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Forced expiratory volume in the 1. second (FEV1) >80%
  • FEV1/FVC-ratio >0,7
  • FeNO <25 pbb
  • Oxygen saturation (SatO2) >95%
  • Negative methacholine Challenge Test = drop in FEV1 less than 20%

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any lung disease
  • Lung symptoms
  • Medicine for lung disease
  • Tobacco smoking
  • Ex-smokers with more than 5 package years
  • BMI (body mass index) >40 kg/m2

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Healthy controls
No lung disease or symptoms. Negative methacholine Challenge Test.
MCT with IOS alone versus MCT IOS and FEV1 combined
Other Names:
  • FEV1 measurement

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oscillometry; R5
Time Frame: baseline (carried out with FEV1 measurement)
Resistance at 5 Hz; kPa/L/s with FEV1 measurement
baseline (carried out with FEV1 measurement)
Oscillometry; R5
Time Frame: 1-10 days from baseline and carried out without FEV1 measurement
Resistance at 5 Hz; kPa/L/s change from baseline
1-10 days from baseline and carried out without FEV1 measurement
Oscillometry; R20
Time Frame: baseline (carried out without FEV1 measurement)
Resistance at 20 Hz; kPa/l/s with FEV1 measurement
baseline (carried out without FEV1 measurement)
Oscillometry; R20
Time Frame: 1-10 days from baseline and carried out without FEV1 measurement
Resistance at 20 Hz; kPa/L/s change from baseline
1-10 days from baseline and carried out without FEV1 measurement
Oscillometry; X5
Time Frame: baseline (carried out without FEV1 measurement)
Reactance at 5 Hz; kPa/l/s with FEV1 measurement
baseline (carried out without FEV1 measurement)
Oscillometry; X5
Time Frame: 1-10 days from baseline and carried out without FEV1 measurement
Reactance at 5 Hz; kPa/L/s change from baseline
1-10 days from baseline and carried out without FEV1 measurement
Oscillometry; AX
Time Frame: baseline (carried out without FEV1 measurement)
Area of reactance; kPa/L with FEV1 measurement
baseline (carried out without FEV1 measurement)
Oscillometry; AX
Time Frame: 1-10 days from baseline and carried out without FEV1 measurement
Area of reactance; kPa/L change from baseline
1-10 days from baseline and carried out without FEV1 measurement
Oscillometry; Fres
Time Frame: baseline (carried out without FEV1 measurement)
Resonant frequency; Hz with FEV1 measurement
baseline (carried out without FEV1 measurement)
Oscillometry; Fres
Time Frame: 1-10 days from baseline and carried out without FEV1 measurement
Resonant frequency; Hz change from baseline
1-10 days from baseline and carried out without FEV1 measurement

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomas J Ringbæk, Allergy and Lung Clinic Elsinore

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 23, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hyperreactive Airway Disease

Clinical Trials on Methacholine Challenge Test

Subscribe