HIV and Alcohol Research Center Focused on Polypharmacy (HARP) Pilot 2 (2nd HARP Pilot Intervention) (HARP)

January 13, 2026 updated by: Yale University
The focus of this pilot will be on falls and neurocognitive symptoms, and the impact of alcohol, cannabis use, and medications on these outcomes. The rationale is that alcohol use at any level may interact with neurocognitively active medications, alcohol, and cannabis use leading to falls and impaired cognition.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Pilot 2 will consist of a brief pharmacist-led intervention for patients with HIV who consumed alcohol in the past month, take 5 or more medications in addition to their antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimen, and one or more of their non ART medications is known to have neurocognitive effects (NCEs, not including antiseizure medications).

Prior to starting intervention: The study staff will recruit and obtain consent. Those who do not opt-out of the study will be contacted by phone and study staff will verify the individual currently consumes alcohol, administer the Alcohol Symptom Checklist, obtain verbal consent for the study, and verify their contact information. The Alcohol Symptom Checklist will be given as a screen during this first contact to determine level of alcohol use. Study staff will inform the participant about the self-administered blood spot test for phosphatidylethanol (PEth) and subsequently send a video with step-by-step instructions on how to perform these tests in a text message after the call. Finally, staff will schedule a brief call (estimated time of 15-20 minutes) with a VA clinical pharmacist assisting with recruitment approximately 3-5 days ahead to conduct a medication reconciliation. After enrollment is complete, a study staff member will request that a home test kit for PEth and the initial survey be sent to the participant from the West Haven Coordinating Center. Once completed, the participant will be asked to put the questionnaire in the self-addressed, stamped envelope and mail it back to the West Haven Coordinating Center. A separate envelope will be provided to send the biomarker samples directly to the analytic lab, processed at the United States Drug Testing Laboratories (USDTL) for rapid analysis.

After enrollment, participants will be contacted by a designated VA clinical pharmacist 1-2 days after the recruitment phone call to confirm a reconciliation of the participant's list of current medications. At this time, the clinical pharmacist will also schedule the intervention call that will take place four weeks ahead.

The intervention will be conducted by an additional group of VA clinical pharmacists specifically trained in IMB-MI procedures prior to the start of the study, following a training plan developed and delivered by expert advisors in the Risk Communication Resource Core of HARP, and trained to criterion standard. This training approach has been successfully used in our previous studies. The intervention will be digitally recorded to allow us to monitor fidelity. These recordings will be stored on our servers behind the VA firewall. Only those who are monitoring intervention fidelity will have access to these recordings.

4 weeks following the intervention call, the clinical pharmacist will check-in with the participant and inquire about their chosen goals and the progress they may or may not have been making, along with motivators and/or setbacks. The clinical pharmacists will remind the participant to complete the immediate post intervention survey (information, motivation, behavioral skills, importance and confidence, behavioral intentions ~5 minutes) once it arrives, and to return it in the enclosed postage paid. The participant is to mail the survey, along with completed monitoring forms from the previous weeks, back to the West Haven Coordinating Center in the self-addressed, stamped envelope provided.

6 months after the interview, participants will be sent a second PEth home test kit to measure changes in alcohol consumption with return envelope, along with a final 6-Month Post Intervention Survey measuring the items listed above, along with feedback questions related to feasibility of the study, clarity of instructions and provided information, PEth test, and open-ended questions for the participant to write in their own comments. We will also check VA EHR pharmacy data.

Finally, we will recontact a subset of participants for qualitative interviews that will elicit their feedback on the intervention. This information includes but is not limited to asking how difficult they found self-administering the PEth test, assessing whether their personalized risk estimate influenced their thinking on their alcohol or medication use, their views on cannabis use, their views on how clearly the clinical pharmacists were able to communicate risk information, how well they liked receiving the intervention from a clinical pharmacist, and the usefulness of the intervention provided to reduce alcohol use. These interviews will be targeted to occur within one week after the 30-day follow-up, but we will allow up to 1 month. We will conduct these interviews by telephone or Microsoft Teams. These conversations will be recorded.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • West Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06516
        • Recruiting
        • VA Connecticut Healthcare System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • HIV+
  • have visited a local VA site in within the past year
  • had an AUDIT-C indicating current alcohol use
  • taking 5 or more non-ART medications, including an NCAM (i.e., benzodiazepines, opioids, muscle relaxants, sleeping medication, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inpatient individuals
  • Patients with an Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) diagnosis in the past 12 months
  • Patients who test positive on the Alcohol Symptom Checklist for moderate or severe AUD during the screening process

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pharmacist lead intervention
Clinical pharmacists will be trained by a team with expertise in behavioral and HIV clinical care, and participate in a 10-hour training course with coaching sessions offered over the course of the study to ensure effective and consistent performance. Pharmacists will be guided by a manual designed to provide and walk them through the necessary skills to perform the pilot intervention easily and effectively. The manual will provide background information, study goals, and describe the critical components of the IMB-MI model and the HARP pilot interventions. An easy to follow, step-by-step approach to performing the intervention will be included. The study protocol to be followed by the clinical pharmacists will be included in the manual along with additional motivational and troubleshooting strategies. Systematic feedback regarding intervention fidelity will be provided by the Evaluation Team.
Delivered by a clinical pharmacist who will employ IMB-MI in informational, participant-centered discussions in which the clinical pharmacist and the participant collaboratively discuss the harms of alcohol use (with or without concurrent use of cannabis) and polypharmacy (specifically neurocognitively active medications), the relationship of these exposures to fall risk and NCEs, and how to mitigate these harms. Together pharmacist and participant will develop a plan for change in alcohol and polypharmacy use, self-monitoring, medications of concern, symptoms, and any additional resources needed. The goal of the intervention being to help patients stop or decrease alcohol use and stop medications in situations where it is safe to do so and agreed upon by the primary provider (but substitutions will be made if necessary).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility: Ability to meet enrollment target of 100 participants
Time Frame: Week -2 to Week 0
Enrollment of 100 Participants: Week -2: Gather list of 100 eligible patients from the online VACS-HIV Index database; Send opt-out letter with study information and contact number. Week -2 to Week 0: Track patients for 2 weeks and note which have opted out. Week 0: Contact patients who have not opted-out; enroll, screen, and conduct medication reconciliation phone call; Send out pre-intervention package.
Week -2 to Week 0
Feasibility: Ability to deliver the complete intervention
Time Frame: Week 3 and week 7
Week 3: 1-hour intervention call between VA clinical pharmacist and participant Week 7: 30-minute booster call between VA clinical pharmacist and participant
Week 3 and week 7
Feasibility:Percentage of Completion of Study Items
Time Frame: up to Month 9
Percentage of completion of study items (Pre-Intervention Survey, Phosphatidylethanol Test, Post-Intervention Survey, 6-Month Post Intervention Survey, Phosphatidylethanol Test 2). Higher percentage indicates more completion of study items.
up to Month 9
Acceptability: comfort, comprehensibility/helpfulness of content
Time Frame: Week 7, Month 9 and Month 9,Week 3
Assessed using a series of multiple-choice feedback and open-ended questions on Post-Intervention Survey and 6-Month Post Intervention Survey and a series of prompts on final semi-structured interview focused on feedback from participant
Week 7, Month 9 and Month 9,Week 3
Acceptability: acceptability of PEth tests
Time Frame: Week 7, Month 9 and Month 9,Week 3
Assessed using a series of multiple-choice feedback and open-ended questions on Post-Intervention Survey and 6-Month Post Intervention Survey and a series of prompts on final semi-structured interview focused on feedback from participant
Week 7, Month 9 and Month 9,Week 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neurocognitive symptoms mean score
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 7 and Month 9
Participants will answer 10 questions asking on a 4 point scale of "no or less" to "lot more" difficulty with different everyday cognitive responsibilities such as losing track of a current task, difficulty remembering appointments, etc. compared to 5 years ago, 4 weeks ago and 6 months ago. Total score range from 0-30. Higher scores will indicate higher cognitive dysfunction, and lower scores will indicate clearer cognitive function.
Weeks 0, 7 and Month 9
Fall Risk
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 7 and Month 9
Participants will be asked about their history of falls and fractures to observe the interaction between cognitive decline and frequency of falls.The predicted probability of a fall is: Phat = 1/ (1 + exponent^(-Linear Predictor)
Weeks 0, 7 and Month 9
Readiness to Change mean score
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 7 and Month 9
A series of 6 questions asking participants on a Likert scale of 1= not at all to 10=extremely regarding their readiness, confidence and importance related to change behaviors about alcohol (3 questions) and medications (3 questions). Total score range 6-60. Higher scores will indicate a strong readiness to change.
Weeks 0, 7 and Month 9
Alcohol Use assessed using PEth
Time Frame: Weeks 0 and Month 9
Participants will complete 2 fingerstick blood spot phosphatidylethanol (PEth) tests on their own at home using items the study staff will provide in the mail. PEth testing uses blood to measure alcohol use by detecting direct alcohol biomarkers in the bloodstream. A positive test with a score <8 indicates alcohol use. Score: <8 = Negative, 8-20 = Low to moderate alcohol use, 20-50 = Heavy alcohol use, 50> = Very heavy alcohol use
Weeks 0 and Month 9
Alcohol Use Survey mean score
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 7 and Month 9
Participants will answer a series of questions on a 4-point scale of "Strongly Disagree" to "Strong Agree" related to their alcohol use. Each question is scored on a scale of 0 to 4, with a total possible score ranging from 0 to 40. Higher scores indicate a greater likelihood of alcohol-related problems or AUD.
Weeks 0, 7 and Month 9
Cannabis Use
Time Frame: Weeks 0, 7 and Month 9
1 question asking participants about cannabis use, Yes/No.
Weeks 0, 7 and Month 9

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amy C Justice, MD, PhD, Yale University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alcohol Drinking

Clinical Trials on Information Motivation Behavioral and Motivational Interviewing (IMB-MI) technique

Subscribe