Effects of Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Pain Following Lumbar Fusion Surgery

March 12, 2026 updated by: Michael Stauff, University of Massachusetts, Worcester

Opioid Usage and Patient Reported Outcome Comparison Following Erector Spinae Plane Block or Subcutaneous Anesthetic in Spinal Fusion Procedures

The purpose of this study is to determine if the method for injecting local anesthesia affects patients' pain and opioid usage after surgery. The investigators will compare subcutaneous anesthesia, injections of anesthesia under the skin, to a method called erector spinae plane block (ESPB). An ESPB injection involves placing local anesthesia along the muscles and bones in the back, using a special type of x-ray called fluoroscopy for guidance. The Investigators will use patient reported outcomes (PROs) and track subjects' opioid usage to find out if there is a difference between ESPB and subcutaneous anesthesia. The investigators hypothesize that patients who get ESPB injections will use less opioids and report less pain after lumbar fusion surgery compared to patients who receive subcutaneous anesthesia injections.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Worcester, Massachusetts, United States, 01655
        • Recruiting
        • UMass Chan Medical School/UMass Memorial Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Michael Stauff, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The individual has signed and dated a study specific informed consent form approved by the Institutional Review Board at UMMHC.
  • The individual is at least 18 years of age.
  • The individual is skeletally mature (over the age of 18).
  • The patient is scheduled for a one or two level lumbar spinal fusion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients unable to consent for themselves.
  • Pregnant women.
  • Non-English speaking subjects.
  • Prisoners.
  • Spinal fusion procedures for a diagnosis of fracture, tumor, and/or infection.
  • Patients who have used greater than 150 morphine milligram equivalents of opioids in the month prior to their operation.
  • Patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 40 or greater.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Erector Spinae Plane Block
An erector spinae plane block (ESPB) will be administered prior to the surgical procedure, but after the patient receives general anesthesia. The injection will consist of 10 mL of saline, 20 mL of liposomal bupivacaine, and 30 mL of bupivacaine. This will be injected along the erector spinae fascial plane at the surgical levels. Fluoroscopy will be used for guidance during the injection.
The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a method for injecting local anesthesia to reduce pain related to a surgical procedure. The anesthesia is theorized to spread along the paraspinal fascia and anesthetize a larger area, resulting in patients reporting less pain and using less opioids postoperatively.
Active Comparator: Subcutaneous Anesthesia
A subcutaneous anesthesia injection will be administered after the surgery has been completed, but while the patient is under general anesthesia. The injection will consist of 10 mL of saline, 20 mL of liposomal bupivacaine, and 30 mL of bupivacaine. This will be injected around the surgical incision, subcutaneously.
Subcutaneous anesthesia injection involves placement of local anesthesia under the skin around the surgical incision. This is thought to reduce pain from the incision site postoperatively.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Opioid Usage
Time Frame: 2 weeks
This is a tracking sheet for the amount of opioid medications used in the first 2 weeks of postoperative recovery.
2 weeks
MOS 36 Item Short Form Health Status Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: 3 months
Questionnaire related to a patient's general health, bodily pain, physical function, and mental health. Scoring includes eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Scales are converted into a 0-100 scale. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the more functionality and therefore indicating better outcome.
3 months
Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: 3 months
Questionnaire related to a patient's back pain and its impact on their day-to-day activities. There are 10 questions, each weighted from 0-5 points. The point total of each question is added together to give a final scaled score ranging from 0-50. Lower scores near 0 are indicative of better outcome and less disability, while higher scores near 50 indicate worse outcomes and more disability.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Stauff, MD, Umass Chan Medical School

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 13, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 30, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All of the individual participant data collected during the trial will be shared after deidentification.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data will be available immediately following publication and will remain available for six (6) years.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The data will be provided to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative

Clinical Trials on Erector Spinae Plane Block

Subscribe