Medical Residents Learning Weight Management Counseling Skills (MRWeight)

September 2, 2025 updated by: Rajani Sadasivam, University of Massachusetts, Worcester

MRWeight: Medical Residents Learning Weight Management Counseling Skills -- A Multi-Modal, Technology-Assisted, Spaced Education Program

The goal of this study is to addresses the lack of weight management training physicians receive during their residency training. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • How affective is the MRWeight curriculum at increasing medical residents weight management counseling (WMC) skills.
  • Evaluate residents' adoption of WMC skills in encounters with their patients
  • what would be the best way to get residents to adopt the WMC skills Residents in the comparison group will receive a course on obesity and weight management. The residents in the intervention group will have to attend 2 informational sessions and will receive 6 email modules on WMC. Both groups will also take part in 3 assessments over the course of 18 months to see which group has better WMC skills.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Overweight and obesity have reached epidemic proportions in the United States, proving to be a very difficult health challenge for both patients and the physicians who care for them. Excess weight is a major contributor to heart disease, stroke, and type 2 diabetes. Addressing overweight and obesity in clinical visits is critical to treating and preventing these obesity-associated diseases. However, Weight Management Counseling (WMC) uptake is low, and physicians report lack of training as a critical barrier to WMC. Residency training is a crucial time to influence physicians' current and future practice, yet there is no evidence-supported WMC curriculum for residents. Informed by two pilot studies, MRWeight will use spaced-education to train residents to deliver WMC using the 5As framework (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, Arrange) and patient-centered counseling. As such, MRWeight will be delivered in short segments and spaced over 12 months using four components: didactic session 1 - a discussion of WMC foundational concepts; 3Ps program (Prepare, Practice, Process) - an email program using the Video-based Communication Assessment (VCA) to facilitate practice of challenging cases; didactic session 2 - a discussion of key barriers to practicing WMC; and email reinforcement of concepts covered in the preceding components. Each component, guided by Social Cognitive Theory (SCT), is designed to build on and reinforce the training provided by the other components. Using a pair-matched group randomized controlled trial (RCT) including 8 Internal Medicine residency programs, we will test the MRWeight intervention with 3 cohorts of postgraduate year 1 residents followed for 18 months. Comparison arm residents will be emailed the PowerPoint of a foundational course on WMC, but unlike those in the Intervention, comparison sites will not include the didactic sessions or the 3Ps program. Our aims are: Aim 1 will evaluate the effectiveness of the MRWeight Intervention for increasing residents' WMC skills at 12 months; Aim 2 will evaluate residents' self-reported adoption of WMC skills in their encounters with patients in clinical practice at 18 months; Aim 3 will explore possible mechanisms (mediators) and moderators of the intervention's effect on Aim 1 and 2 outcomes (residents' WMC skills and adoption). The study will be the first large trial to test a curriculum that has been integrated into Internal Medicine residency programs for teaching WMC skills. The multi-PIs (Drs. Ockene and Sadasivam) will build on 36-years of successfully conducting large randomized trials to evaluate training programs, including those that taught the 5As and patient-centered counseling for WMC, in 18 medical schools, 10 residency sites, and 10 primary care settings. This study is timely, given public health momentum strongly advocating for physician training and involvement in WMC and the dissemination and implementation of clinical guidelines for obesity treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

630

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
        • Recruiting
        • Stanford University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Kim Chiang, MD
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95820
        • Recruiting
        • UC Davis
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Stephany Sanchez, MD
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Boston University
        • Contact:
          • Juhee McDougal, MD
          • Phone Number: 617-414-5951
          • Email: jcmcd@bu.edu
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Juhee McDougal, MD
    • New York
      • East Setauket, New York, United States, 11733
      • The Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
        • Recruiting
        • Albert Einstein College of Medicine
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jing Yu Pan, MD
    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
        • Recruiting
        • Penn State University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Eliana Hempel, MD
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19140
        • Recruiting
        • Temple University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sharon Herring, MD,MPH
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Recruiting
        • Houston Methodist
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Melina Awar, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All PGY1 residents in participating sites

Inclusion Criteria for participating site:

  • The program is willing and able to incorporate the MRWeight program into the PGY1 core curriculum.
  • The residency director will allow PGY1s to complete surveys and curriculum evaluations online or in class and to complete a standardized assessment of their knowledge and use of WMC, and
  • The site will allow inclusion of three successive cohorts of PGY1s to ensure more than a sufficient number of residents to adequately test the effect of the intervention

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Comparison Arm
Residents in comparison arm receive a core foundation course and will take part in all 3 assessments (including 3 surveys and 2 video communication assessments) over the course of 18 months.
Residents will receive a core foundation slides on weight management counselling
Experimental: Intervention Arm
Residents in the intervention arm will receive (in addition to the core foundation course) 6 email modules and practice video communication assessments on weight management counseling. They will also attend 2 educational session and take part in all 3 assessments (including 3 surveys and 2 video communication assessments) over the course of 18 months.
Residents will receive a core foundation slides on weight management counselling
A 45-minute foundational presentation covering key Weight Management Counseling (WMC) concepts, obesity bias, and cultural humility facilitated by a trained clinician-educator at the residency program delivered at baseline.

6 email modules delivered over months 2-8). Each 3P module will allow the resident to:

(1) Prepare: Review relevant concepts and demonstration videos sent via an email to prepare for completing the VCA vignettes; (2) Practice: Respond to brief vignettes of various 5As WMC challenging scenarios by audio recording their spoken response on the VCA tool; and (3) Process: Reflect on actionable expert and crowdsourced analogue patient feedback on the quality of their responses to each VCA vignette.

(months 8-10): This 45-minute session will discuss key barriers to WMC adoption in clinical practice using real-world cases captured from residents facilitated by a trained clinician-educator at the residency program.
2 emails in months 10-12 covering key concepts in the preceding components.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
WMC skills VCA (video Communications assessment) assessment
Time Frame: Completed during month 1 and again at month 12 post recruitment.
Residents in both arms will be asked to complete the assessment VCA vignettes that will include a series of vignettes representing challenging cases. 4-6 trained raters blinded to the residents' study arm (intervention vs. comparison) will rate the residents' responses.
Completed during month 1 and again at month 12 post recruitment.
Change in WMC skills assessment
Time Frame: Completed during months 1, 12 and 18 post recruitment.
This measure will be assessed using an online survey at baseline (study start), at 12 months, and 18 months.
Completed during months 1, 12 and 18 post recruitment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in adoption scale Scores at eighteen months
Time Frame: Completed during months 1, 12 and 18 post recruitment.
This measure will be assessed using Adoption scale (7-item checklist assessing resident adoption of WMC skills in their encounters with patients in clinical practice) on a 5-point on a Likert Scale [never (0) to always (4)].
Completed during months 1, 12 and 18 post recruitment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 31, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 10, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY00000691
  • 1R01DK134372-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Weight Management Counseling

Clinical Trials on PowerPoint of the foundational course

Subscribe