Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Local Wound Infiltration After Modified Radical Mastectomy

November 20, 2025 updated by: tarek abdel hay mostafa, Tanta University

Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Local Wound Infiltration on Postoperative Pain After Modified Radical Mastectomy

This randomized prospective double blinded study will aim to evaluate the postoperative analgesic effect of ultrasound guided Erector Spinae plane block and local wound infiltration (drain block) for patients scheduled for modified radical mastectomy surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide and it represents 1 in 4 cancers diagnosed among women globally. Modified Radical Mastectomy (MRM) is a commonly performed surgery for breast cancer and is associated with moderate-to-severe postoperative pain. Poor postoperative pain management can lead to increased chances of the development of chronic pain. Therefore, adequate postoperative pain management after breast cancer surgery is essential. Regional block for pain management has many advantages in such patients including provision of adequate analgesia, reduced need for opioids, decreased postoperative nausea & vomiting and postoperative pulmonary complications. It also facilitates early ambulation. Thoracic Epidural (TE), paravertebral block (PVB), pectoral nerve I & pectoral nerve II blocks, serratus anterior plane block and erector spinae plan block have been used with good results. In particular, the erector spinae has proven to reduce pain severity and opioid consumption in this group of patients. Further, in meta-analysis, the ESP block was shown to effectively alleviate postoperative pain severity and reduce opioid consumption. In ESP block, local anesthetic is deposited deep to the erector spinae muscle which results in blocking of the ventral and dorsal rami of multiple spinal nerves. The LA diffuses into the paravertebral space and cephalo-caudally and blocks the pain by action on dorsal rami, ventral rami, and lateral cutaneous branches of intercostal nerves. Also, in many situations, a superior postoperative analgesia yet avoiding the detrimental effects of opioids, can be extracted from a simple technique of wound instillation of local anesthetics through surgical drain which provide a satisfactory long opioid free postoperative analgesic period.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

37

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • El Gharbyia
      • Tanta, El Gharbyia, Egypt, 31111
        • Faculty of medicine, Tanta University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I-II
  • scheduled for unilateral Modified radical mastectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal.
  • Patient with neurological deficit.
  • Patient with bleeding disorders.
  • Uncooperative patient.
  • Infection at the block injection site.
  • Patients with history of allergy to local anesthetics.
  • Advanced hepatic, cardiac or renal failure.
  • Chronic opioid consumption.
  • Body mass index (BMI)≥ 30 kg m-2
  • Chronic use of gabapentin or pregabalin

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Erector Spinae Block
Patients of this group will receive ultrasound guided erector spinae block with injection of (20 ml) of plain bupivacaine 0.25% (max dose 2mg/kg) injected beneath the erector spinae muscle sheath at the level of the fourth transvers process (T4).
patients will be placed in the lateral decubitus position. The ESP block is usually performed at the level of fourth transvers process. The ultrasound probe should be placed in a cephalo-caudal orientation over the midline of the back at the desired level.Under aseptic conditions, the block needle will be inserted in plane at an angle of 30-40° in cranial-to-caudal direction until the tip contacted the T4 transverse process at erector spinae plane. After hydro-dissection with 2-3 mL of isotonic saline solution to confirm the correct needle tip position and after negative aspiration to prevent intra vascular injection or position, (20 ml) of plain bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected deep to the erector spinae muscle.
Active Comparator: Drain block
Patients of this group will receive local wound infiltration (drain block) with injection of (20 ml) of plain bupivacaine 0.25% (max dose 2mg/kg) injected in each surgical drain (pectoral and axillary drains) thereafter, the drains would then clamped for 20 minutes and declamped later on.
after the surgeon complete the surgery and insert the surgical drains (pectoral and axillary drains) we will inject 20ml of plain bupivacaine 0.25% in each surgical drain, the drains will be clamped for 20 minutes then declamped.
Other Names:
  • drain block

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
total morphine consumption
Time Frame: first postoperative day after modified radical mastectomy surgery
total morphine amount which will be consumed in the first postoperative day
first postoperative day after modified radical mastectomy surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 29, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post Operative Pain

Clinical Trials on Erector spinae plane block

Subscribe