Comparison of the Flexibility of the Perineum in Primiparous Women Using the Medical Device Emagina During 90 Days of Their Pregnancy Compared to Those Having a Standard Pregnancy Follow-up (PeriFlex)

April 29, 2026 updated by: Mumming

A Prospective, Multicentric, Randomized Clinical Investigation Assessing the Impact of Perineal Training With the Emagina Medical Device on Perineal Flexibility During Pregnancy and Childbirth

The goal of this clinical investigation is to learn if training with Emagina device can improve flexibility of the perineum during childbirth with the help of a balloon that inflates in the genital area according to a time-limited exercise program specifically developed to optimize results, in adult, pregnant women with their first child (single fetus) less than 24 weeks of amenorrhea at the time of inclusion (i.e. during the 5th month of pregnancy).

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does the Emagina training program improve perineal flexibility during pregnancy ?
  • Does the Emagina training program reduce the proportion and importance of perineal tears, as well as the proportion of sutures and episiotomies during childbirth ?

Researchers will compare Emagina group to a Control group (no intervention) to see if Emagina device works to improve perineum flexibility.

Participants will :

  • measure the flexibility of their perineum on 2 occasions 90 days apart, with or without perineal training
  • perform perineal training with the Emagina medical device or follow current practice
  • fill out e-questionnaires regarding quality of life, lifestyle, pelvic static disorders, sexual activity and urinary incontinence

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

88

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Boulogne-Billancourt, France, 92100
        • Ornella Ferrari, 1 Bis Rue Castéja
      • Coutances, France, 50200
        • Annabelle Sallandre, 7 Rue Ambroise Paré
      • Grandchamps-des-Fontaines, France, 44119
        • Solène Baradu, 5 Rue des Sports
      • Marseille, France, 13008
        • Grazia Sabatino, 2 impasse du Gaz
      • Montpellier, France, 34070
        • Jennifer Denys, 53 rue de la Méditerranée
      • Montpellier, France, 34080
        • Elsa Molinier, 127 Rue Maurice Béjart
      • Paris, France, 75010
        • Alexandra Sasportas, 8 Boulevard de Magenta
      • Paris, France, 75011
        • Alice Rault, 103 Avenue de la République
      • Paris, France, 75015
        • Marion Alglave, 8 Rue Ernest Renan
      • Ronchin, France, 59790
        • Sobiha Sbai, 370 Avenue Jean Jaurès
      • Rouen, France, 76000
        • Tiphaine Cartier, 45 Boulevard des Belges
      • Rouen, France, 76100
        • Céline Vauclin, 1 Avenue Jacques Chastellain
      • Saint-Paul-lès-Dax, France, 40990
        • Ariane Gasulla, 43 Rue Camille Claudel
      • Suresnes, France, 92150
        • Annabel Buzy, 39 avenue Jean Jaurès
      • Verneuil-sur-Seine, France, 78480
        • Karen Methia, 15 Allée du Gros Chêne

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women over 18 years of age
  • Singleton (fetus)
  • Primiparous subject
  • Subject less than 5 months pregnant (between 20 and 24 week of amenorrhea)
  • Subject affiliated to a social security plan
  • Subject who has given written consent prior to any specific procedure related to the clinical investigation
  • Subject able to understand and complete the clinical investigation questionnaires
  • Subject having a smartphone and being able to download the Emagina app

Exclusion Criteria:

  • High-risk pregnancy (subjects presenting pregnancy-related risks will be excluded from participating in this clinical investigation, including risks of premature delivery, cases of symptomatically low-lying placenta and any contraindications to sexual relations)
  • Scheduled cesarean section prior to inclusion
  • History of vaginal or perineal surgery prior to pregnancy
  • Pelvic anomalies
  • Threatened preterm delivery prior to inclusion
  • Vaginismus
  • Use of Epi-no prior to inclusion
  • Collagenosis or other chronic disorders affecting collagen
  • Planned home birth
  • Nerve damage and other illnesses that reduce sensitivity to pain in the genital area (i.e. paraplegia, multiple sclerosis, diabetic neuropathy, medication that alters sensitivity in the genital area, vulvar varicose veins).
  • Persons deprived of liberty, under guardianship or trusteeship
  • Drug or alcohol abuse
  • Dementia, mental impairment, or psychiatric pathology that may compromise subject informed consent and/or compliance with the protocol and trial monitoring
  • Subject unable to comply with protocol monitoring for psychological, social, family or geographic reasons

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Subjects using the Emagina Medical device
Emagina Medical device
The subjects will use the device at home according to a series of 3 exercises, 2 sessions per week, followed by a series of 4 exercises, 3 sessions per week starting from D75.
Other: Control group
Standard of Care (SOC)
The subjects will follow usual care instructions. Subjects are not trained in the use of Emagina.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximum diameter of balloon expelled at D90
Time Frame: Day 90
To compare the flexibility of the perineum in primiparous subject having followed, during the pregnancy, the program of perineal training of the medical device Emagina during 90 days versus those having had a standard pregnancy follow-up
Day 90

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of the expulsive phase
Time Frame: At Birth
Expulsive phase will be defined with: the duration of the expulsive phase, the % of instrumental extraction (forceps, spatulas or vacuum-assisted delivery), the % of epidural anesthesia
At Birth
Comparison of perineal injuries
Time Frame: At birth
Perineal injuries will be defined with: the degree of perineal tears (according to the classification of perineal trauma), the % of grades 1, 2, 3, 4, the % of episiotomies, the % of perineal suture
At birth
APGAR score of the baby at birth
Time Frame: At Birth
APGAR score at 1 minute, 5 minutes and 10 minutes after birth
At Birth
Height of the baby at birth
Time Frame: At birth
Height measured in cm
At birth
Weight of the baby at birth
Time Frame: At birth
Weight measured in g
At birth
Head size of the baby at birth
Time Frame: At birth
Head circumference measured in cm
At birth
Sex of the baby
Time Frame: At birth
Gender of the baby determined at birth
At birth
Quality of life (SF-12)
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 months after birth
Quality of life assessed by the SF-12 and lifestyle assessed by a short survey
Baseline and 2 months after birth
Subject's satisfaction during delivery
Time Frame: 2 months after birth
Subject's satisfaction during delivery assessed by the QACE questionnaire
2 months after birth
Postnatal pelvic statics disorders
Time Frame: At baseline and 2 months postpartum
Pelvic statics disorders assessed by the PFIQ-7 questionnaire
At baseline and 2 months postpartum
Postnatal return to normal sexual activity
Time Frame: At baseline and 2 months postpartum
The % of subjects with return to normal sexual activity 2 months after delivery assessed by FSFI questionnaire (Yes/No),
At baseline and 2 months postpartum
Postnatal urinary leakage
Time Frame: At baseline and 2 months postpartum
the % of subjects with urinary leakage 2 months after delivery assessed by ICIQ-UI questionnaire
At baseline and 2 months postpartum
Postnatal perineal rehabilitation session
Time Frame: 2 months after birth
Number of perineal rehabilitation session prescribed by investigator
2 months after birth
Variation of pressure exerted by the perineum during the flexibility measurement
Time Frame: At Day 0 and Day 90 visits
The variation of pressure exerted by the perineum during the flexibility measurement will be defined with following parameters: The pressure exerted while the balloon is fully inflated inside the vagina " IN ", The maximum pressure exerted during the expulsion of the balloon " EXP ", The pressure exerted when the balloon is outside " OUT ", Variation between IN and EXP defined as IN-EXP, Variation between EXP and OUT defined as EXP-OUT
At Day 0 and Day 90 visits
Usability of the device
Time Frame: 2 months after birth
Usability of Emagina assessed by the subjects through a questionnaire developed by the sponsor (i.e. ease of use of Emagina device, absence of technical issues while using Emagina device)
2 months after birth
Percentage of Compliance with the device
Time Frame: From baseline to birth
Percentage of Compliance assessed by the Emagina App and defined as the number of days of use divided on the theoretical days of use
From baseline to birth
Adverse events
Time Frame: From baseline through study completion, an average of 6 months
Adverse events recorded from ICF (Informed Consent Form) signature until final visit including the rate of unscheduled cesarean sections
From baseline through study completion, an average of 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David Desseauve, MD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble Alpes

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 12, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 10, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 30, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PeriFlex
  • 2023-A01980-45 (Other Identifier: Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pregnancy

Clinical Trials on Training with the Emagina device at home until birth

Subscribe