Effects of an Automatic Oxygen Titration System in People With Hypoxemia During Exercise Training

August 12, 2024 updated by: Prof. Dr. Andreas Rembert Koczulla, Schön Klinik Berchtesgadener Land

Automatic Oxygen Titration Versus Constant Oxygen Flow Rates During Exercise Training in Hypoxemic People With Chronic Lung Disease - a Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Cross-over Pilot Study

Long-term oxygen therapy is a fundamental treatment modality for patients with chronic hypoxaemic lung disease. Typically, oxygen is administered at a constant flow rate. However, due to fluctuating activity levels, patients' oxygenation status can vary, potentially leading to oxygen desaturation and increased dyspnoea.

Emerging evidence suggests that automatic oxygen titration - a method of adjusting oxygen flow in response to current oxygen saturation - may have acute advantages over constant oxygen flow.

The primary objective of this study is to investigate the effect of automatic oxygen titration compared to prescribed constant oxygen flow rates on patients' perceived dyspnoea during exercise endurance training.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale:

Hypoxaemia is common in people with chronic lung disease and can affect exercise tolerance. Oxygen therapy is then recommended.

Oxygen supplementation is usually delivered at constant oxygen flow rates. Only a few studies have investigated the short-term effects of automated oxygen delivery compared to a constant oxygen flow rate during exercise tests (e.g. 6-minute walk test, shuttle walk tests). These studies have shown that automatic oxygen delivery can lead to an acute increase in exercise capacity, including an improvement in the perception of breathlessness. The use of automated oxygen delivery during endurance exercise has not been studied. The most common reason for stopping prolonged exercise in patients with chronic lung disease is dyspnoea. Therefore, the use of automatic oxygen delivery in a pulmonary rehabilitation clinic could be beneficial in the context of personalised therapy for patients requiring oxygen if it further reduces dyspnoea, potentially enabling the patient to train their endurance even better.

Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to investigate whether the use of automatic oxygen supplementation versus constant oxygen supplementation has a different effect on the perception of dyspnoea in patients with hypoxaemia during endurance exercise.

Design:

This study is designed as a randomised, double-blind, controlled cross-over trial. Participants will first undergo a cycle-based peak work rate test to determine their individual maximal peak work rate. They then take part in two sets of five endurance training sessions. One set is performed with a constant oxygen flow prescribed for each participant, while the other uses automatic oxygen titration. The order in which these two sessions are performed is randomised.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Bavaria
      • Schönau a.Königssee, Bavaria, Germany, 83471
        • Recruiting
        • Klinikum Berchtesgadener Land, Schön Kliniken
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic lung disease
  • Hypoxemia (pO2< 55mmHg) under room air conditions (rest or during exercise) or SpO2<88% during exercise
  • established Long-term oxygen therapy or given indication for a Long-term oxygen therapy/ supplemental oxygen therapy for exercise
  • Age: 18 to 80 years
  • Participation in an inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program (Schoen Klinik BGL, Germany)
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

- Acute exacerbation of underlying pulmonary disease requiring cessation of exercise training.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Excercise Training Order A and B
The first series of five exercise trainings (A) involves supplemental oxygen therapy, with automatically titrated oxygen flow rates to maintain an oxygen saturation of 90-94% (A). The second series of five exercise trainings employs supplemental oxygen therapy with constant flow rates (B), as prescribed.
During five exercise training sessions, oxygen therapy is delivered via prescribed constant oxygen flow
During five exercise sessions, oxygen therapy is delivered via an automatically titrated oxygen flow rate to maintain an SpO2 target of 90-94%.
Experimental: Excercise Training Order B and A
The first series of five exercise trainings employs supplemental oxygen therapy with constant flow rates (B), as prescribed.The second five series of five exercise trainings involves supplemental oxygen therapy, with automatically titrated oxygen flow rates to maintain an oxygen saturation of 90-94% (A).
During five exercise training sessions, oxygen therapy is delivered via prescribed constant oxygen flow
During five exercise sessions, oxygen therapy is delivered via an automatically titrated oxygen flow rate to maintain an SpO2 target of 90-94%.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dyspnea
Time Frame: Day 1 to 5 and 6 to 10
Change of dyspnea sensation rated by modified Borg scale (0 to 10) taken before and after exercise training
Day 1 to 5 and 6 to 10

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of oxygen saturation (SpO2) during exercise training
Time Frame: Day 1 to 5 and 6 to 10
SpO2 measured by continuous transcutaneous recordung via Sentec-Digital Monitor® (Sentec, Therwil, Switzerland).
Day 1 to 5 and 6 to 10
Change of transcutaneous partial CO2 pressure (TcPCO2) during exercise training
Time Frame: Day 1 to 5 and 6 to 10
TcPCO2 measured by continuous transcutaneous recording via Sentec-Digital Monitor® (Sentec, Therwil, Switzerland)
Day 1 to 5 and 6 to 10
Change of heart rate during exercise training
Time Frame: Day 1 to 5 and 6 to 10
Heart rate measured by continuous transcutaneous recordung via Sentec-Digital Monitor® (Sentec, Therwil, Switzerland).
Day 1 to 5 and 6 to 10
Change of capillary partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2) during exercise training
Time Frame: Day 1 to 5 and 6 to 10
pCO2 measured by capillary blood gases taken before and after the exercise training
Day 1 to 5 and 6 to 10
Change of capillary partial pressure of O2 (pO2) during exercise training
Time Frame: Day 1 to 5 and 6 to 10
pO2 measured by capillary blood gases taken before and after the exercise training
Day 1 to 5 and 6 to 10
Change of inspiratory capacity (IC) during exercise training
Time Frame: Day 1 to 5 and 6 to 10
IC measured by Spirometry taken before and after exercise training via SpiroSense Pro® (Pari, Starnberg, Germany)
Day 1 to 5 and 6 to 10
Time to desaturation (SpO2 <=90%) and to severe desaturation (SpO2 <=85%) during exercise training
Time Frame: Day 1 to 5 and 6 to 10
SpO2 measured by continuous transcutaneous recordung via Sentec-Digital Monitor® (Sentec, Therwil, Switzerland)
Day 1 to 5 and 6 to 10
Assessment of leg fatigue via BORG scale
Time Frame: Day 1 to 5 and 6 to 10
Change of leg fatigue assessed by modified Borg scale (0 to 10) taken before and after exercise training
Day 1 to 5 and 6 to 10
Patients sensation regarding the oxygen delivery system
Time Frame: Day 5 and 10
Patients will be asked to rate their experienced comfort after Session 1 and Session 2 via a 5-point Likert Skale: strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, strongly disagree
Day 5 and 10

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andreas Rembert Koczulla, Prof. Dr., Philipps University Marburg Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 14, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • O2matic exercise training

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Lung Disease

Clinical Trials on Oxygen therapy - constant oxygen flow

Subscribe