Effects of HFOT on Exercise Performance in Patients With COPD. A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

February 5, 2020 updated by: University of Zurich

Effects of High Flow Oxygen Therapy on Exercise Performance in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

This will be a randomized, cross-over trial evaluating the efficacy of nasal high-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) vs. low-flow oxygen therapy (LFOT) on cycling endurance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This will be a randomized, cross-over trial evaluating the efficacy of nasal HFOT vs. LFOT on cycling endurance in patients with COPD. Each patient will perform two constant load cycling exercise tests to exhaustion using HFOT and LFOT on two consecutive days, respectively, according to randomization. The load of the cycle ergometer will be set at 75% of the individually estimated maximum work rate (Wmax). During exercise tests, LFOT will be provided by a standard nasal cannula at a flow rate of 3 L/min using an oxygen concentrator. HFOT will be applied by a dedicated large bore nasal cannula at a flow rate 60 L/min, FiO2 45%, temperature 32 °C, using a HFOT device.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

79

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
        • National Center of Cardiology and Internal Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

Men and women, 35 to 75 years of age, with moderate to severe COPD, (FEV1/FVC <0.7, FEV1 40-80% predicted, resting SpO2 ≥92%, PaCO2 <6 kPa at 760 m) who live <800 m will be invited.

Exclusion criteria:

COPD exacerbation, very severe COPD with hypoxemia (FEV1/FVC <0.7, FEV1 <40% predicted, oxygen saturation on room air <92%), current heavy smoking (>20 cigarettes per day), comorbidities such as uncontrolled cardiovascular disease, internal, neurologic, rheumatologic or psychiatric disease that interfere with protocol compliance.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: HFOT first then LFOT
HFOT will be applied by a dedicated large bore nasal cannula (Optiflow+, Fisher&Paykel, New Zealand) at a flow rate 60 L/min, FiO2 45%, temperature 32 °C, using a HFOT device (myAIRVO2, Fisher&Paykel, New Zealand).
LFOT will be provided by a standard nasal cannula at a flow rate of 3 L/min using an oxygen concentrator (EverFlow, Philips Respironics).
EXPERIMENTAL: LFOT first then HFOT
HFOT will be applied by a dedicated large bore nasal cannula (Optiflow+, Fisher&Paykel, New Zealand) at a flow rate 60 L/min, FiO2 45%, temperature 32 °C, using a HFOT device (myAIRVO2, Fisher&Paykel, New Zealand).
LFOT will be provided by a standard nasal cannula at a flow rate of 3 L/min using an oxygen concentrator (EverFlow, Philips Respironics).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Exercise endurance time in seconds
Time Frame: HFOT on day 1 vs. LFOT on day 2 or vice versa, according to randomization
Difference in the exercise endurance time between HFOT vs. LFOT during a constant load exercise test at 75% of the maximal work capacity.
HFOT on day 1 vs. LFOT on day 2 or vice versa, according to randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dyspnea sensation
Time Frame: HFOT on day 1 vs. LFOT on day 2 or vice versa, according to randomization
Difference in the exercise induced dyspnea sensation between HFOT vs LFOT assessed by the BORG CR10 scale ranging from 0 "no dyspnea at all" to 10 "Maximum of dyspnea" assessed at the end of exercise.
HFOT on day 1 vs. LFOT on day 2 or vice versa, according to randomization
Subjective leg fatigue sensation
Time Frame: HFOT on day 1 vs. LFOT on day 2 or vice versa, according to randomization
Difference in the exercise induced subjective leg fatigue sensation between HFOT vs LFOT assessed by the BORG CR10 scale ranging from 0 "no leg fatigue at all" to 10 "Maximum of leg fatigue" assessed at the end of exercise.
HFOT on day 1 vs. LFOT on day 2 or vice versa, according to randomization
Arterial blood gases
Time Frame: HFOT on day 1 vs. LFOT on day 2 or vice versa, according to randomization
Difference of parameters in the arterial blood gases, in particular pH, SaO2, PaO2 and PaCO2 between HFOT vs. LFOT at the end of exercise.
HFOT on day 1 vs. LFOT on day 2 or vice versa, according to randomization
Heart rate in bpm
Time Frame: HFOT on day 1 vs. LFOT on day 2 or vice versa, according to randomization
Difference in the maximal heart rate assessed by ECG between HFOT vs. LFOT at the end of exercise.
HFOT on day 1 vs. LFOT on day 2 or vice versa, according to randomization
Arterial blood pressure in mmHg
Time Frame: HFOT on day 1 vs. LFOT on day 2 or vice versa, according to randomization
Difference in the maximal blood pressure between HFOT vs. LFOT at the end of exercise.
HFOT on day 1 vs. LFOT on day 2 or vice versa, according to randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Furian, PhD, University Hospital, Zürich
  • Study Director: Talant M Sooronbaev, MD, National Center of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Bishkek

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 20, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 2, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 2, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 20, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 6, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Clinical Trials on High-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT)

Subscribe