Surgical Treatment of Pelvis in Fragility Fracture in Germany: a Prospective, National, Multicenter, Observational, Comparative Cohort Study Comparing Isolated Posterior Versus Combined Anterior-posterior Surgical Fracture Stabilization (AO TOP)

February 13, 2025 updated by: AO Innovation Translation Center

Over a period of approximately two years, patients above the age of 65 who have suffered from an FFP equal to or higher than type IIc FFP, according to Rommens and Hofmann, will be eligible for inclusion. At least 420 patients will be included and followed up up for 12 months. Treatment and postoperative care, will be as per standard of care at the participating institution, with a free choice of isolated posterior or combined anterior-posterior surgical treatment.

Pain levels, quality of life, level of mobility and independence will be assessed at different time points. Furthermore, both clinical and radiographic outcomes, complications, morbidity and mortality associated with interventions will be evaluated. Assessment and evaluation will be performed at defined time points during FU according to standard of care.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

420

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients 65 years or older with a fragility fracture in the pelvis.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with sacral FFP (no concomitant injuries) Types: IIc, IIIc, IVb, IVc according to Rommens and Hofmann associated with fracture of the anterior pelvic ring (fractures involving the anterior lip of the acetabulum that are not regarded as acetabular fracture will be included)
  • Diagnostic workup for fracture diagnosis and classification performed using CT scan as per standard of care
  • Indication for surgical fracture fixation as considered by the attending surgeon
  • Age ≥ 65 yrs.
  • Low-energy trauma fracture, or osteoporotic fracture, or insufficiency fracture, or spontaneous fracture
  • ASA-Score ≤ 3 pts.
  • Ability to provide informed consent according to the IRB/EC defined and approved procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with multiple fractures
  • Instability of the pubic symphysis (ie, visibility of a widening or diastasis of the symphysis), and/or fractures of the pubic rami next to the symphysis, that indicate instability
  • Pelvic fractures due to high-energy trauma
  • Pathologic fractures (eg, fractures caused by malignancy or infection)
  • History of pelvic fracture or pelvic ring surgery (hip joint implants do not count)
  • Clinically significant or unstable medical or surgical condition that prevents surgical treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Isolated posterior surgical fracture stabilization
isolated posterior surgical fracture stabilization vs. combined anterior-posterior surgical fracture stabilization
Combined anterior-posterior surgical fracture stabilization
isolated posterior surgical fracture stabilization vs. combined anterior-posterior surgical fracture stabilization

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain rating
Time Frame: Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) 3 month after surgical fixation of the fragility fracture of the pelvis
Perception of pain will be assessed using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from 1-10, where patient reports pain due to his/her pelvis fracture. A higher value correlates with greater pain.
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) 3 month after surgical fixation of the fragility fracture of the pelvis

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Richard Stange, Prof, Universitatsklinikum Munster
  • Principal Investigator: Lars Grossterlinden, Prof, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 9, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 13, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AO TOP

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pelvis; Fracture

Clinical Trials on Fracture stabilization

Subscribe