Sacral Fracture Fusion/Fixation for Rapid Rehabilitation (SAFFRON)

April 12, 2024 updated by: SI-BONE, Inc.
To determine the safety and efficacy of concomitant sacral fracture fixation and sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion vs. non-surgical management for patients with debilitating sacral fragility or insufficiency fractures

Study Overview

Detailed Description

SAFFRON is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of surgical fixation of sacral insufficiency or fragility fractures (SFIF) with concomitant fusion of the sacroiliac (SI) joint vs. nonsurgical management (NSM). The goal of the study is to demonstrate the safety, performance, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of use of iFuse-TORQ™ in the treatment of sacral fragility or insufficiency fractures vs. NSM.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • Davis, California, United States, 95817
        • Withdrawn
        • UC Davis Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • Recruiting
        • University of Chicago
        • Contact:
          • Alexis Robinson-Dear
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jason Strelzow, MD
    • Minnesota
      • Bloomington, Minnesota, United States, 55431
        • Withdrawn
        • TRIA Orthopedics, Mpls MN
    • Nebraska
      • Lincoln, Nebraska, United States, 68501
        • Recruiting
        • Bryan Health Medical Center
        • Contact:
          • Bobbi Clinch
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Steven F Shannon, MD
    • New Jersey
      • Livingston, New Jersey, United States, 07039
        • Recruiting
        • Saint Barnabas Medical Center
        • Contact:
          • Ian Hong
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Richard Yoon, MD
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15212
        • Withdrawn
        • Allegheny Singer Research Institute
      • Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States, 19610
        • Recruiting
        • Orthopedic Associates of Reading
        • Contact:
          • Kristen Goshert
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ryan Michels, MD
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Recruiting
        • Medical University of South Carolina
        • Contact:
          • Gabby Rivera
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Kristoff Reid, MD
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Withdrawn
        • Memorial Hermann
      • Temple, Texas, United States, 76508
        • Withdrawn
        • Baylor Scott and White Research Institute
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22903
        • Recruiting
        • University of Virginia
        • Contact:
          • Eric McVey
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Michael Hadeed, MD
    • Washington
      • Richland, Washington, United States, 99352
        • Recruiting
        • Kadlec Clinic Northwest Orthopedic & Sports Medicine
        • Contact:
          • Carlee Abel
        • Principal Investigator:
          • John David Black, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ≥ 60 years of age at screening.
  2. Posterior pelvic pain correlating with fracture location that began EITHER within 14 days of a low-energy traumatic event, OR in the last 60 days in the absence of a traumatic event
  3. Imaging (X-ray, CT, or MRI) showing fracture of the sacrum (unilateral or bilateral)
  4. Patient is either bedbound or must use a wheelchair to cover distances more than 50ft
  5. Prior to fracture, patient was able to ambulate using a cane or unassisted
  6. Medically stable to undergo either surgical or non-surgical treatment of index fracture.
  7. Patient is willing and able to provide written informed consent
  8. Patient is mentally able to comply with study protocol requirements

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient requires surgery to address fracture in the pelvic ring (NSM not feasible)
  2. Anatomic anomalies/defects that would preclude safe and/or biomechanically acceptable placement of implants across the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) and into the sacrum
  3. Sacral fracture potentially or definitely related to tumor
  4. Any permanent implants already in the sacrum (including cement), ilium, or anterior pelvic ring that could interfere with placement of transiliac transsacral or iliosacral screws or iFuse-TORQ implants
  5. History of recent (within 1 year) non-index pelvic fracture with nonunion of sacrum or ilium.
  6. Other clinically active fragility fracture of spine, hip, arms, or legs that could impair recovery from sacral fracture
  7. Uncontrolled psychiatric disease (e.g., dementia, schizophrenia, major depression, personality disorders) that could interfere with study participation or assessments
  8. Prominent neurologic condition that would interfere with study participation including the use of electronic diaries (e.g., dementia) or recovery of mobility (e.g., severe diabetic neuropathy, multiple sclerosis)
  9. Known allergy to titanium or titanium alloys
  10. Current local or systemic infection that raises the risk of surgery.
  11. Known or suspected active drug or alcohol abuse, including opioids.
  12. Patient lives or plans to move more than 100 miles from the site during the course of the study.
  13. Current enrollment in another investigational clinical trial related to fractures or osteoporosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Non-Surgical Treatment
Non-surgical management (NSM) of sacral insufficiency or fragility fractures (SFIF)
Non-surgical management (NSM) is any treatment deemed appropriate for the subject that does not involve surgery.
Experimental: Surgical Treatment
Surgical fixation of sacral insufficiency or fragility fractures (SFIF) with concomitant fusion of the sacroiliac (SI) joint
Surgical sacral fracture fixation and SI joint fusion using iFuse-TORQ

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time following treatment initiation to reach a 2-point improvement in mobility from baseline as measured using self-rated Modified Functional Mobility scale (MFMS).
Time Frame: 1 year
The study's primary efficacy endpoint is the time required to achieve an improvement from baseline (study entry) of 2 or more points on the Modified Functional Mobility scale. The scale is administered on a weekly basis following the initiation of treatment until achieving a 2-point improvement or the subject crosses over.
1 year
Proportion of subjects with serious adverse event (SAE) probably or definitely related to a complication of sacral fracture and/or associated treatment (both arms) or probably or definitely related to iFuse-TORQ (surgery only).
Time Frame: 1 year

If randomized to surgery:

Proportion of subjects with either:

  • Serious adverse event deemed probably or definitely related to iFuse-TORQ
  • Serious adverse event deemed probably or definitely a complication of sacral fracture and/or associated treatment

If randomized to NSM:

Proportion of subjects with:

  • Serious adverse event deemed probably or definitely a complication of sacral fracture and/or associated treatment
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Continuous Summary Physical Performance Score (CSPPS)
Time Frame: 1 year
Change of CSPPS scores at 6 weeks and 12 months. Continuous Summary Physical Performance Score (CSPPS) is a scoring system based on the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) that is optimized for use in the elderly.
1 year
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Change from baseline in self reported PROMIS physical function score at 6 weeks. This domain is scored between 1 (unable to do) and 5 (can be done without difficulty).
6 weeks
Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Change from baseline in self reported Oswestry Disability Index at 6 weeks. Calculated scores range from 0 (no disability) to 50 (completely disabled).
6 weeks
Numeric Rating Scale pain score
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Change from baseline in self reported Numeric Rating Scale pain score at 6 weeks. Pain scale ranges from 0 (pain free) to 10 (max pain).
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Robyn Capobianco, PhD, SI-BONE

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 18, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 15, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 22, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoporosis

Clinical Trials on Non-Surgical Management

3
Subscribe