The Benefit of Repairing the Deltoid Ligament in Unstable Ankle Fractures

August 12, 2025 updated by: Ostfold Hospital Trust

The Benefit of Repairing the Deltoid Ligament in Unstable Ankle Fractures: Patient-reported Functional Outcome and Radiological Stability Measurements

Ankle fractures occur in 1 out of 800 persons a year and is a common injury. The deltoid ligament is necessary for the stability of the joint and guides choice of treatment. Cadaveric studies have shown that deltoid ligament repair gives more stability than the osteosynthesis of the lateral malleolus itself. The investigators want to show if suture of the deltoid ligament in unstable ankle fractures contribute to a better functional result and/or prevent long term osteoarthritis for our participants. Patients sustaining severe ankle fractures have shown a considerable loss of function that might affect their long term activities of daily living (ADL) function. Improving outcome for this group may preserve some patients' ability to work and reduce community expenses.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

During the last two decades less severe ankle fractures have been shown not to need operative treatment in general. The total number of ankle fracture surgeries has gone down. Therefore, surgically treated ankle fractures nowadays are on average more complex. The understanding of these injuries implies a recognition of the role of the deep deltoid ligament as a main stabilizer of the ankle joint. Deltoid ligament repair is documented to be a good option to regain ankle joint anatomy from smaller studies. This repair also compensates for syndesmotic injury to some extent. The effect of deep deltoid ligament repair in Weber B ankle fractures and its effect on long term function and arthritis is not yet known from clinical studies.

The investigators aim to show whether deltoid ligament suture gives a clinically significant superior result than solely osteosynthesis of the lateral malleolus in unstable ankle fractures. This will be performed as a multicentre randomized controlled study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria; fluent in oral and written Norwegian language

  • isolated Weber type B fractures and Weber B+ posterior malleolar Mason Molloy class I.
  • Initial medial clear space (MCS)>=7mm or weightbearing x-ray evaluated as unstable or primary reposition after fracture dislocation.
  • Pre-injury walking ability without aids.

Exclusion criteria

  • assumed not compliant (drug use, cognitive- and/or psychiatric disorders).
  • previous history of ipsilateral ankle fracture or ipsilateral major ankle-/foot surgery.
  • open fx Gustilo Anderson II or more, multi-trauma and pathologic fracture.
  • neuropathies and generalized joint disease such as Rheumatoid Arthritis or other more severe condition in same extremity
  • fixation of tibial fragment or syndesmotic screw or suture button planned prior to surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Conventional treatment
Unstable Weber B fractures receiving standard treatment, plate and screw fixation of the lateral malleolus only
Experimental: Additional deltoid ligament suture
Unstable Weber B fractures receiving standard treatment, plate and screw fixation of the lateral malleolus and additional deep deltoid ligament suture
The deep deltoid ligament will be sutured through a curved incision lifting the tibialis posterior tendon out to be sutured back after tying the ligament to an anchor in the talus.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-reported functional outcome 1 year after injury
Time Frame: 1 and 2 years after injury, function 5 years after injury will also be collected
Function will be measured in Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) (ankle specific) (0 (worst)-100 (best))
1 and 2 years after injury, function 5 years after injury will also be collected
Differences in radiological stability parameters with or without ligament suture at group level
Time Frame: 1 and 2 years after injury, function 5 years after injury will also be collected
Differences in medial clear space (mm) on weightbearing x-rays or Gravity test at group level
1 and 2 years after injury, function 5 years after injury will also be collected

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
General health state reported through a general (generic) Patient-reported outcome measure (PROM)
Time Frame: up to 5 years
The generic Euroquol EQ-5D (EQ 5D-5L) reports general health based on 5 items where Index scores range from -0.59 to 1; 1 is the best possible health state. Negative values represent health states perceived as worse than dead, which is equal to 0.
up to 5 years
Posttraumatic ankle arthritis
Time Frame: 1,2 and 5 years
Arthritis seen on weightbearing x-rays will be reported according to Kellgren Lawrence Scale (KGLS) (0 no arthritis to 4 severe/end stage arthritis with bone to bone contact and bone wear and osteophytes)
1,2 and 5 years
VAS Pain
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 1, 2 and 5 years
scale limited by intervals of no pain (0) and worst imaginable pain (100)
6 weeks, 3 months, 1, 2 and 5 years
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)
Time Frame: 1, 2 and 5 years
We will use a version of the Mobility bank 2.1. The setup and calculation method is still not clear. We await further progress from the organization developing this PROM. We hope to get a computer adapted testing (CAT) version of this survey ready in a Norwegian version within the start of 1 year follow up in September 2025
1, 2 and 5 years
Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS)
Time Frame: 3 months, 1, 2 and 5 years
Ankle specific PROM based on 12 items, scale 0(worst) - 48 (best possible)
3 months, 1, 2 and 5 years
Ankle Fracture Outcome of Rehabilitation Measure
Time Frame: 3 months, 1, 2 and 5 years
Ankle Specific PROM based on 15 main items where 0 is the worst index score and 100 the best
3 months, 1, 2 and 5 years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complications
Time Frame: especially on first visits after surgery ie 6 and 12 weeks, and later visits up to 5 years after surgery.
Infection, suture anchor malplacement, delayed/non-union and reoperation rate will be recorded.
especially on first visits after surgery ie 6 and 12 weeks, and later visits up to 5 years after surgery.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 20, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2032

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 23, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 13, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2024104

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ankle Fractures

Clinical Trials on Additional deep deltoid ligament suture

Subscribe