Assessment of Ability of 3D Fluorscopy in Aiding Accurate Syndesmotic Reduction Following Traumatic Ankle Injury

August 22, 2019 updated by: Joshua L Gary, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Does Intraoperative 3D Fluoroscopy Accurately Assess Syndesmotic Reduction Following Traumatic Ankle Injury?

The purpose of this study is to determine if use of new imaging technology termed "3D fluoroscopy" will lead the surgeon to change the position of the fractured bones to a more accurate position.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • The University of Texas at Health Science Center at Houston

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Skeletally mature
  • Patients with unilateral, acute, displaced ankle fractures with preoperative evidence of syndesmotic disruption or intraoperative evidence of syndesmotic instability following malleolar fixation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients skeletally immature;
  • Patients less than age 18 years and more than age 75;
  • Patients with previous ankle trauma to either ankle;
  • Patients with bilateral ankle injuries;
  • Patients with previous osseous injuries to the tibia or fibula; and
  • Patients with isolated syndesmotic injury and no fracture (i.e. high ankle sprains)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 2D Fluoroscopy then 3D Fluoroscopy
Patients with syndesmotic instability will undergo reduction of the syndesmosis followed by provisional fixation with a clamp or Kirshner wire. The reduction quality will be initially compared to the contralateral ankle mortise and talar-dome lateral radiographs using the technique of Summers et al (2D Fluoroscopy). After the attending surgeon is satisfied with the reduction quality, 3D fluoroscopy will be used to generate additional images to assess syndesmotic and fibular reductions. Both 2D and 3D Fluoroscopy will be performed using device "Ziehm Vision RFD 3D image-intensified fluoroscopic x-ray system".
Patients with syndesmotic instability will undergo reduction of the syndesmosis followed by provisional fixation with a clamp or Kirshner wire. The reduction quality will be initially compared to the contralateral ankle mortise and talar-dome lateral radiographs using the technique of Summers et al i.e. 2D Fluoroscopy using device Ziehm Vision RFD 3D image-intensified fluoroscopic x-ray system.
After the attending surgeon is satisfied with the reduction quality from 2D Fluoroscopy, 3D fluoroscopy using device Ziehm Vision RFD 3D image-intensified fluoroscopic x-ray system will be used to generate additional images to assess syndesmotic and fibular reductions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants for Which the Surgeon Changed Reduction of Syndesmotic Reduction Because of Information Provided by 3D Fluoroscopy
Time Frame: Immediately at the time of 3D Fluoroscopy
Patients with syndesmotic instability will undergo reduction of the syndesmosis followed by provisional fixation with a clamp or Kirshner wire. The reduction quality will be initially compared to the contralateral ankle mortise and talar-dome lateral radiographs using the technique of Summers (2D Fluoroscopy). After the attending surgeon is satisfied with the reduction quality, 3D fluoroscopy will be used to generate additional images to assess syndesmotic reductions.
Immediately at the time of 3D Fluoroscopy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants for Which the Surgeon Changed Reduction of Fibular Fracture Reduction Because of Information Provided by 3D Fluoroscopy
Time Frame: Immediately at the time of 3D Fluoroscopy
Patients with syndesmotic instability will undergo reduction of the syndesmosis followed by provisional fixation with a clamp or Kirshner wire. The reduction quality will be initially compared to the contralateral ankle mortise and talar-dome lateral radiographs using the technique of Summers (2D Fluoroscopy). After the attending surgeon is satisfied with the reduction quality, 3D fluoroscopy will be used to generate additional images to assess fibular fracture reductions.
Immediately at the time of 3D Fluoroscopy
Pain as Assessed by the AOFAS Score
Time Frame: 3 months after 3D Fluoroscopy
The patient outcome variables studied will include American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores
3 months after 3D Fluoroscopy
Function as Assessed by the AOFAS Score
Time Frame: 3 months after 3D Fluoroscopy
The patient outcome variables studied will include American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores
3 months after 3D Fluoroscopy
Alignment as Assessed by the AOFAS Score
Time Frame: 3 months after 3D Fluoroscopy
The patient outcome variables studied will include American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores
3 months after 3D Fluoroscopy
Pain as Assessed by the AOFAS Score
Time Frame: 6 months after 3D Fluoroscopy
The patient outcome variables studied will include American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores
6 months after 3D Fluoroscopy
Function as Assessed by the AOFAS Score
Time Frame: 6 months after 3D Fluoroscopy
The patient outcome variables studied will include American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores
6 months after 3D Fluoroscopy
Alignment as Assessed by the AOFAS Score
Time Frame: 6 months after 3D Fluoroscopy
The patient outcome variables studied will include American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores
6 months after 3D Fluoroscopy
Pain as Assessed by the PROMIS Score
Time Frame: 3 months after 3D Fluoroscopy
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) patient physical health outcome measures
3 months after 3D Fluoroscopy
Function as Assessed by the PROMIS Score
Time Frame: 3 months after 3D Fluoroscopy
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) patient physical health outcome measures
3 months after 3D Fluoroscopy
Pain as Assessed by the PROMIS Score
Time Frame: 6 months after 3D Fluoroscopy
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) patient physical health outcome measures
6 months after 3D Fluoroscopy
Function as Assessed by the PROMIS Score
Time Frame: 6 months after 3D Fluoroscopy
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) patient physical health outcome measures
6 months after 3D Fluoroscopy
Number of Participants With Syndesmotic Malreduction as Assessed by a Single Postoperative Bilateral CT Scan
Time Frame: 1 day after 3D Fluoroscopy
Malreduction will be determined by comparing uninjured ankle to the injured ankle
1 day after 3D Fluoroscopy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joshua L Gary, MD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 11, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

September 11, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 12, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HSC-MS-16-0840

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Displaced Ankle Fractures

Clinical Trials on 2D Fluoroscopy

3
Subscribe