The C-MAC Video Laryngoscope Helps Presbyopic Anesthetists

August 31, 2024 updated by: Egymedicalpedia

The C-MAC Video Laryngoscope Helps Presbyopic Anesthetists to Overcome Difficulty in Neonatal and Infantile Intubation. A Randomized Controlled Trial

Endotracheal intubation is the de facto gold standard for airway management especially in neonatal and pediatric anesthesia .

An efficient neonatal airway management is challenging even in the most experienced hands and the prevalence of difficult intubation in pediatric anesthesia varied greatly on a wide range.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Neonatal intubation is a life-saving procedure, which requires skilled operator but still may cause direct tissue trauma and precipitate adverse reactions. However, intubation with videolaryngoscope (VL) requires less force than with a direct laryngoscope to minimize the possibility of these adverse events.

The recent Brazilian recommendations for management of pediatrics difficult airways included proper assessment, preparation, positioning, pre-oxygenation, minimizing trauma, maintenance of arterial oxygenation and the implementation of the advanced tools as VL, flexible intubating bronchoscopy, and supraglottic devices.

The recent British recommendations also advised for the use VL with an age-adapted standard blade as first choice for tracheal intubation and the use of a stylet to reinforce and preshape tracheal tubes in case of the use of hyperangulated VL blades .

Considering the recent interest in assessing the performance of various VLs in pediatric anesthesia, the C-MAC® (Karl Storz, Germany) VL with standard Miller blade sizes #0 and #1, is a widely used in neonates and infants for its provision of superior-quality glottis view in comparison to the McGrathTM MAC size #1 blade and direct laryngoscopy.

Presbyopia is defined as disordered eye adjustment function and affects middle aged people leading to difficult viewing close objects and is corrected with magnifying lens.

Earlier studies documented that presbyopic aged anesthetists find difficulty when trying to view a patient's larynx at a close distance and this difficulty is surely magnified on dealing with intubation of neonates and children

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Al-Azhar University Hospitals

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pediatric Patients whom scheduled for surgical procedures under general inhalation anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients older than 12 months
  • patients with Mallampati score of 3 or 4,
  • patients had abnormal airway and obstructive sleep apnea,
  • manifestations of upper respiratory tract infection or uncompensated cardiopulmonary diseases
  • patients with ASA grade >III were excluded from this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group A: (video laryngoscope Group)
About 50 anesthetists in charge must be older than 40 years; each anesthetist had to manage at least 10 patients from both groups received endotracheal intubation (ETI) using the SL and VL group had intubated using the C-MAC® (Karl Storz, Germany) VL with the standard Miller blade and flexible Stylet (2 mm PORTEX® stylet; Smiths Medical International Ltd., UK) to strengthen the endotracheal tube (ETT) and adjust its curvature as C-shaped. The study outcomes included the frequency of successful intubation within 30 s (30-s SR) and the number of intubation attempts. .
Evaluation of the success rates (SR) of anesthetists aged ≥45 years for intubating neonates and infants using the C-MAC videolaryngoscope (VL) in comparison to the use of the standard laryngoscope (SL).
Active Comparator: Group B: (Standard laryngoscope Group)
About 50 anesthetists in charge must be older than 40 years; each anesthetist had to manage at least 10 patients from both groups received endotracheal intubation (ETI) using the SL and VL group had intubated using the C-MAC® (Karl Storz, Germany) VL with the standard Miller blade and flexible Stylet (2 mm PORTEX® stylet; Smiths Medical International Ltd., UK) to strengthen the endotracheal tube (ETT) and adjust its curvature as C-shaped. The study outcomes included the frequency of successful intubation within 30 s (30-s SR) and the number of intubation attempts. .
Evaluation of the success rates (SR) of anesthetists aged ≥45 years for intubating neonates and infants using the C-MAC videolaryngoscope (VL) in comparison to the use of the standard laryngoscope (SL).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the frequency of successful intubation
Time Frame: 30 seconds
The frequency of the need for external laryngeal manipulation, head extension, or stylet curvature change to achieve intubation
30 seconds

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ahmed M.Elnagar, M.D, Al-Azhar University, Faculty of medicine for boys

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 5, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

January 10, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 30, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 3, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • The C-MAC Video

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Presbyopia

Clinical Trials on Video Laryngoscope

Subscribe