- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06582160
Enhancing Uptake of Preconception Care Services in Family Practice Clinics Using a Patient Centered Screening Tool
December 22, 2025 updated by: University of Nebraska
Enhancing Uptake of Preconception Care Services in Family Practice Clinics Using a Patient Centered Screening Tool: A Pilot Study
Sixteen years have passed since the Centers for Disease Control recommended routine preconception screening and counseling in primary care settings, yet time constraints and low preconception counseling adherence have prevented widespread uptake.
This innovative, self-selected preconception screening tool encourages participants to be active in their own care and eliminates the time burden associated with typical pre-selected screening in clinics.
This project will generate important knowledge about the promise of utilizing a participant-selected preconception screening tool to promote preconception health behavior change during routine medical encounters for women of reproductive age.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Women who make positive health behavior changes to protect their fetus typically do so after learning about the pregnancy, unaware that the period of maximum sensitivity to these changes has passed.
Fewer than half of mothers enter pregnancy at a healthy weight and an increasing percentage of pregnancies are affected by chronic hypertension and other chronic health conditions.
These risk factors are predictive of poor birth outcomes and increased risk to maternal health, yet they are difficult to modify after conception.
Routine pre-onception screening and counseling is recommended for all women of reproductive age, yet adherence is low.
More than sixteen years after the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommended routine preconception screening and counseling in primary care settings, fewer than one-fifth of primary care providers conduct this critical screening.
Pioneering approaches are needed to increase preconception screening and improve patient adherence to preconception recommendations in primary care settings.
This innovative, self-selected preconception screening tool encourages patients to be active participants in their own care and eliminates the time burden associated with typical pre-selected screening.
Typical pre-selected risk screening tools ask patients a series of predetermined health-related questions to identify health risks.
Pre-selected tools identify health information needs for the participant, based on the participant's response to the risk assessment.
This study proposes a patient-selected screening tool, whereby the participant selects from a list of preconception counseling topics based on her own perceived need for information.
This tool has fewer questions, reducing time burden.
The first specific aim of this project is to compare topics identified for counseling and overall identification of risk between the two screening approaches.
The second aim is to compare preconception knowledge, behavior change intention and self-efficacy between participant who receive participant-selected and pre-selected preconception screening.
The third aim is to utilize a QUAN-qual sequential mixed methods design to explain quantitative results and identify novel options for preconception counseling.
To accomplish this objective, a pilot study will be conduct in a mid-size primary care clinic located in a Midwest urban setting.
Female participants of child-bearing age will be randomly assigned to receive: 1) pre-selected preconception screening; 2) participant-selected preconception risk screening; or 3) no screening.
Participants will then be invited to a follow-up interview.
Participants will be asked about their experiences with the preconception tools and how to better incorporate preconception screening and counseling into primary care settings.
The findings from the quantitative pilot study will be integrated with the qualitative data using an explanatory sequential joint display.
This project's results can demonstrate the relevance of utilizing a quicker and potentially more effective preconception screening tool for improving maternal and child health.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
286
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Nebraska
-
Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68104
- Nebraska Medicine - Fontenelle Clinic
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Biologically female
- Child-bearing age
- Visiting the clinic for a routine or preventative appointment during the study period
Exclusion Criteria:
- Under 19 or over 49 years of age
- Not biologically female
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Patient-centered Pre-conception Screening
A short form, 2 question screening form which asks participants which preconception health topics they would like to discuss with their doctor today.
Includes an option for "None of these.
I would not like to discuss how my health can affect fertility and any future pregnancies"
|
A short form, 2 question screening administered via tablet in health clinic waiting room.
Offered to participants when checking-in for appointment.
|
|
Active Comparator: Risk-based Pre-conception Screening
A long form questionnaire screening for a range of preconception health risk factors including: age, weight, exercise, diet, nutrition, health conditions, risky behaviors, immunization status, prescription medications, birth control use
|
A long form questionnaire screening questionnaire administered via tablet in health clinic waiting room.
Offered to participants when checking-in for appointment.
|
|
No Intervention: Control
Participant is asked a single question: "Your health today can make a difference for the pregnancy you experience tomorrow.
Do you agree with the statement above?"
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Risk Detection Rate
Time Frame: 18 month duration of study
|
Percentage of participants identified as having at least one preconception risk factor.
Risk rate will be compared between the two types of screen tool (Group 1 - Short Form/Patient Centered and Group 2 - Long Form/Risk Based).
Risk detection rates between the two screening methods will be compared against the benchmark risk as assessed in the post-visit questionnaire.
|
18 month duration of study
|
|
Screening Tool Completion Rate
Time Frame: 18 month duration of study
|
Rate of completion for each screening tool.
Percent of participants with 75% completion of the screening tool will be compared across Group 1 (Short Form/Patient Centered) and Group 2 (Long Form/Risk Based).
|
18 month duration of study
|
|
Health Care Relationship Trust Scale - Revised
Time Frame: 18 month duration of the study
|
Participants trust in their health care provider will be measured using the Health Care Relationship Trust Scale - Revised (HCR Trust Scale-R).
HCR Trust Scale-R scores range from 0 to 52, which higher scores indicating greater levels of trust.
The instrument will be administered in the post-visit questionnaire.
Trust scores will be compared across intervention arms and against the control group.
|
18 month duration of the study
|
|
Preconception Health Behavior Intentions
Time Frame: 18 month duration of the study
|
Intention to change health behavior and self-efficacy for change in response to identified health risks.
Measured in the post-visit questionnaire, through the Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI).
PEI scores range from 0 to 12, which higher scores indicating greater levels of patient enablement.
Additionally, the research team developed two survey items.
One item asks respondents if they have the knowledge and skills to improve their preconception health.
Response options are yes or no.
The second item asks how confident respondents feel that they will make at least one preconception health change.
Response options follow Likert scale (1-4) ranging from "Not at all confident" to "Extremely confident."
Comparisons in preconception health behavior intention will be compared between both intervention arms, and against the control group.
|
18 month duration of the study
|
|
Preconception Knowledge
Time Frame: 18 month duration of the study
|
Awareness of basic preconception health care was assessed through the post-visit questionnaire.
To assess knowledge, participants read the following statement: "The following are a set of statements about health and pregnancy.
Please answer whether you agree, disagree or are unsure about these statements."
This was followed by a series of statements about preconception health such as: "Folic acid should be taken before pregnancy;" "A person's weight when they become pregnant can affect the pregnancy; and "Certain health conditions, like diabetes and hypertension can increase the chances of pregnancy complications."
Possible responses were "Agree," "Disagree," or "Unsure."
Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicated higher knowledge.
Preconception awareness will be compared across the two intervention groups and against the control group.
|
18 month duration of the study
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Shannon I Maloney, PhD, University of Nebraska
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 23, 2023
Primary Completion (Actual)
August 26, 2025
Study Completion (Actual)
August 26, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 26, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 29, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
September 3, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
December 24, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 22, 2025
Last Verified
December 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 0422-22-EP
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Women
-
National Institute of Neurosciences and Hospital...Directorate General of Health Services, BangladeshActive, not recruitingPregnant Women | Pregnant Women and Their OffspringBangladesh
-
Near East University, TurkeyCompletedHealthy Postmenopausal Women | Serum CNP Levels | Healthy Reproductive Age Women | Healthy Perimenopausal WomenCyprus
-
TC Erciyes UniversityNot yet recruitingHypotension in Pregnant Women | Headache in Pregnant Women
-
Universidad Peruana Cayetano HerediaCompleted
-
Halic UniversityCompletedWomen With Low Sexual Satisfaction | Partners of Women With Low Sexual SatisfactionTurkey
-
Inonu UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Camilo Jose Cela UniversityRecruiting
-
Ataturk UniversityCompleted
-
Nantes University HospitalRecruiting
-
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di BolognaRecruiting
Clinical Trials on Patient-centered Pre-conception Screening
-
Indonesia UniversityCompleted
-
Ohio State UniversityCompletedChronic Disease | Communication Research | Advance Care PlanningUnited States
-
University of New MexicoCompletedPain, Postoperative | Physical Activity | Opioid Use | Abuses Over-The-Counter/Prescription Medications | Patient Dependence onUnited States
-
Universitair Ziekenhuis BrusselHasselt University; Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg; Vrije Universiteit Brussel; Kom Op...RecruitingBreast Cancer | Breast Neoplasms | SurgeryBelgium
-
CNGE ConseilRecruitingColorectal Cancer ScreeningFrance
-
University of PennsylvaniaCompletedGeneral Medical Inpatient ConditionsUnited States
-
Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkCompletedAmbulatory SurgeryUnited States
-
Public Health Foundation Enterprises, Inc.ViiV Healthcare; San Francisco Department of Public Health; Lyon-Martin Community...Active, not recruiting
-
University of OuluOulu University HospitalNot yet recruitingHealth, Subjective | Cost EffectivenessFinland
-
Sint MaartenskliniekRadboud University Medical CenterCompletedMusculoskeletal Diseases | Rheumatoid ArthritisNetherlands