Effects of Two Sub-occipital Techniques on Limited Mobility According to the Flexion-rotation Test

May 1, 2018 updated by: Andoni Carrasco, Universidad de Zaragoza

Comparative Study of the Effects of Two Sub-occipital Techniques on Healthy Subjects With Limited Mobility According to the Flexion-rotation Test

The cervical spine should work as a functional unit. If hypomobility should exist in any of the segments it would limit the mobility of the spine as a whole. Although it is frequent that certain cervical segments present hypomobility, they are not always related to symptomatology. The effects of inhibition sub-occipital techniques on cervical mobility have not been evaluated.

The objetive of this trials is to assess and compare the effects on cervical mobility, of the manual technique of sub-occipital inhibition by applying pressure and self-treatment by way of Occipivot® cushion, in subjects with no cervical symptomatology but with limited mobility assessed by the flexion-rotation test.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Zaragoza, Spain, 50009
        • Unidad de Investgación en Fisioterapia. Universidad de Zaragoza

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 60 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Flexion rotation test with less than 32º or asymmetry of 10º between right and left, whenever one of the sides does not exceed physiological C1-C2 ROM (45º)
  • Sing the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to tolerate FRT
  • Contraindication to manual therapy.
  • Cervical treatment during the study.
  • Poor language and communication skills making difficult to undertand the informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Manual technique of sub-occipital inhibition

The technique applied to Manual Group was performed with the patient supine position. Physiotherapist in a sitting position at the head of the subject with forearms resting on the table . Suboccipital region was located , and flexing the metacarpophalangeal joints 90º a pressure was made ventrally , relaxing the rest of the head in the heel of the hand.

The technique was performed for 5 minutes

Experimental: Self-treatment by way of Occipivot®
The technique applied to the Instrumental Group was performed with the patient supine in the same position as the Manual Group . It was previously instructed the subject how to proceed with the cushion Occipivot® , indicating the installation location and method of affixing , correcting him if the application was inadequate. The subject placed the cushion Occipivot® under the suboccipital region and told him he had to stay in that position for 5 minutes. A physiotherapist warned the patient at the end of the application time so that the subject had to be aware not to control it.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in baseline in Range of movement in Upper Cervical Spine
Time Frame: 15 minutes after intervention
Flexion-rotation test measured by CROM device
15 minutes after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in baseline in Range of motion of cervical spine
Time Frame: 15 minutes after intervention
15 minutes after intervention
Change in baseline in Upper cervical spine range of motion
Time Frame: 15 minutes after intervention
15 minutes after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

August 4, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PI16/0147

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Upper Cervical Spine Rotational Hypomobility

Clinical Trials on Manual technique of sub-occipital inhibition

3
Subscribe