- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06605001
Development, Attention, and Inhibition Study (DAISY)
Delay of Gratification: Life Habits of Delaying and Cascading Effects on Life Outcomes
The goal of this clinical trial is to test the associations of young children's early life experiences with delaying behaviors and links with later life outcomes. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Do experiences with waiting in early childhood predict delaying behavior in context-specific ways?
- Are links between delaying behavior and life outcomes impacted by social conventions, effort and choices around delaying, or other behaviors?
Participants will:
- Complete two delaying tasks with either a sweet or wrapped gift
- Complete three "Simon says"-like games that measure inhibition, cognitive flexibility and proactive control
- Answer a set of questions about academic readiness
- Answer a set of questions about social conventions
- Complete a waiting game on the computer while a camera records eye movements
- Parents will answer questions about their child's behaviors and experiences at home
- Participants will return after 1 year to repeat a subset of these measures
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
In sessions 1 and 2, 4-6-year-olds will complete a delay of gratification task (randomly assigned to one of two groups, to delay with either a sweet or a wrapped gift), the NASA Load Index to report perceived demand and effort for the delay of gratification task, a computerized delay choice measure (while pupillometric data is collected), a Go/No-Go task, the NIH Toolbox Dimensional Change Card Sort, a Track-It task, a task measuring sensitivity to social conventions, and Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Achievement. Parents will complete the Child Behavioral Checklist (CBCL), the Child Behavior Questionnaire (CBQ), the REEF executive function questionnaire, and questionnaires about demographics and children's experiences waiting at mealtimes, when opening gifts, and in other contexts.
In session 3 (1 year after sessions 1 and 2), participants and parents will repeat the measures from sessions 1 and 2.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Rachel Foster, B.S.
- Phone Number: +1 530 754 4551
- Email: refoster@ucdavis.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Yuko Munakata, PhD
- Email: ymunakata@ucdavis.edu
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Davis, California, United States, 95618
- Recruiting
- Center for Mind and Brain
-
Contact:
- Lab Manager
- Phone Number: 530-754-4562
- Email: ciclm@ucdavis.edu
-
Principal Investigator:
- Yuko Munakata, Ph.D.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Delay of Gratification - Treat
Reward presented is a sweet treat.
|
Children will complete a delay of gratification task with 1 of 2 rewards
|
|
Experimental: Delay of Gratification - Gift
Reward presented is a wrapped gift.
|
Children will complete a delay of gratification task with 1 of 2 rewards
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Choice Delay
Time Frame: Immediately after and 1 year after intervention
|
Pattern of waiting behavior represented by area under the curve (AUC) for wait times.
|
Immediately after and 1 year after intervention
|
|
Executive Functions
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and 1 year after intervention
|
Composite scores from the REEF, a questionnaire measuring executive functioning.
|
Pre-intervention and 1 year after intervention
|
|
Social Conventions
Time Frame: Immediately after and 1 year after intervention
|
Social task measuring adherence to social conventions.
|
Immediately after and 1 year after intervention
|
|
Academic Readiness
Time Frame: Immediately after and 1 year after intervention
|
Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Achievement: Letter-Word Identification and Applied Problems standardized scores.
|
Immediately after and 1 year after intervention
|
|
Inhibitory Control (Go/No-Go)
Time Frame: Immediately after and 1 year after intervention
|
Accuracy (No-Go trials) during the Go/No-Go inhibitory control task.
|
Immediately after and 1 year after intervention
|
|
Experiences Waiting at Home
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and 1 year after intervention
|
Composite score from a questionnaire developed for this study, measuring experiences with waiting.
|
Pre-intervention and 1 year after intervention
|
|
Cognitive Flexibility (DCCS)
Time Frame: Immediately after intervention and 1 year after intervention
|
Accuracy (perseveration errors) during the Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS) task.
|
Immediately after intervention and 1 year after intervention
|
|
Problem Behaviors
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and 1 year after intervention
|
Composite and sub-scale scores from CBCL, a questionnaire measuring children's problem behaviors.
|
Pre-intervention and 1 year after intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pupil dilation during delayed choice
Time Frame: Immediately after and 1 year after intervention
|
Pupil dilation while waiting for expected reward, or skipping for a new trial.
|
Immediately after and 1 year after intervention
|
|
Behavior while delaying
Time Frame: During initial and 1 year follow-up intervention
|
Video coding of targeted behaviors (i.e., anticipatory behavior) during delay of gratification.
|
During initial and 1 year follow-up intervention
|
|
Subjective Effort
Time Frame: During initial and 1 year follow-up intervention
|
Self-reported demand and effort during the delay of gratification task on the NASA Task Load index.
|
During initial and 1 year follow-up intervention
|
|
Proactive Control
Time Frame: During initial and 1 year follow-up intervention
|
Accuracy during the Track-It proactive control task.
|
During initial and 1 year follow-up intervention
|
|
Child Temperment
Time Frame: Pre-intervention and 1 year after intervention
|
Composite score from the CBQ, a questionnaire measuring child temperament.
|
Pre-intervention and 1 year after intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: Rachel Foster, B.S., University of California, Davis
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1518244
- R01HD086184 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on The Ability to Delay Gratification
-
Benha UniversityEnrolling by invitationTo Assess the Ability of PI to Detect Preload ResponsivenessEgypt
-
University of British ColumbiaCompletedEfficacy of the Expert System's Ability to Help Detect Critical EventsCanada
-
IRCCS San RaffaeleRecruitingSelf-awakening: Ability to Wake Up Without the Aid of Any TimekeeperItaly
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiCompletedAbility to Influence Behavior | Information SystemsUnited States
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisNot yet recruitingThe Patient's Ability to Decide to Return Home After HospitalizationFrance
-
Istinye UniversityCompletedThe Study Will Not be Based on Any Disease | Ability to Swim 100m Independent Freestyle | Be Between the Ages of 9-16 | Continuing Running as Part of a Sports ClubTurkey
-
Ohio State UniversityEmory University; Nationwide Children's HospitalTerminated
-
Aier School of Ophthalmology, Central South UniversityUnknownMeibomian Gland Massage is Important to Delay the Development of Meibomian Gland DysfunctionChina
-
University of FloridaNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedEffect of Age-related Changes in the Brain on Walking AbilityUnited States
-
Baylor UniversityCompletedBody Composition | Voice Range Profile | Reflux Symptom Index | Evaluation of Ability to Sing EasilyUnited States
Clinical Trials on Delay of Gratification
-
University of DundeeCompletedHeart Failure | Cardiac Resynchronisation PacemakersUnited Kingdom
-
Centre hospitalier de Ville-Evrard, FranceRecruitingDelayed Antipsychotic Treatment, Pharmacological Factors and Individual FactorsFrance
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompleted
-
University of California, San DiegoCompletedAtrioventricular Block | Cardiac Arrhythmia | Sick Sinus Syndrome | Symptomatic BradycardiaUnited States
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterTerminatedPulmonary DiseaseNetherlands
-
Anup Katheria, M.D.CompletedPlacental TransfusionUnited States
-
Military Institute of Medicine, PolandUnknown
-
Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research HospitalCompletedAtrioventricular Block | Conduction System PacingTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Temple UniversityUniversity of Pennsylvania; National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication...Enrolling by invitation
-
Biotronik, Inc.CompletedCongestive Heart FailureSwitzerland, United States